Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(293)

Unified Diff: content/browser/frame_host/mixed_content_navigation_throttle.cc

Issue 1905033002: PlzNavigate: Move navigation-level mixed content checks to the browser. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@console-security-message
Patch Set: Fixed external handling order change for request start and redirects. Created 4 years, 5 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: content/browser/frame_host/mixed_content_navigation_throttle.cc
diff --git a/content/browser/frame_host/mixed_content_navigation_throttle.cc b/content/browser/frame_host/mixed_content_navigation_throttle.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..38b75b1442a3f2356ada4555e4248e99f2cab0da
--- /dev/null
+++ b/content/browser/frame_host/mixed_content_navigation_throttle.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,306 @@
+// Copyright 2016 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "content/browser/frame_host/mixed_content_navigation_throttle.h"
+
+#include "base/strings/stringprintf.h"
+#include "content/browser/frame_host/frame_tree.h"
+#include "content/browser/frame_host/frame_tree_node.h"
+#include "content/browser/frame_host/navigation_handle_impl.h"
+#include "content/browser/frame_host/render_frame_host_delegate.h"
+#include "content/browser/renderer_host/render_view_host_impl.h"
+#include "content/public/browser/content_browser_client.h"
+#include "content/public/common/content_client.h"
+#include "content/public/common/origin_util.h"
+#include "content/public/common/request_context_type.h"
+#include "content/public/common/url_constants.h"
+#include "content/public/common/web_preferences.h"
+#include "net/base/url_util.h"
+#include "third_party/WebKit/public/platform/WebMixedContent.h"
+#include "url/gurl.h"
+#include "url/origin.h"
+#include "url/url_constants.h"
+
+namespace {
+
+using namespace content;
+
+// Should return the same value as SchemeRegistry::shouldTreatURLSchemeAsSecure.
+bool HasPotentiallySecureScheme(const GURL& url) {
+ // TODO(carlosk): find out how to properly handle these secure schemes. Should
+ // statically defined ones in Chrome/embedder come from a shared file? Should
+ // dynamically defined ones from extensions register both with browser and
+ // renderer code? See http://crbug.com/627502.
Mike West 2016/07/19 14:39:31 Super very important nit: http_s_.
carlosk 2016/07/19 16:32:16 Done. But why? Fear of MITM attacks?
+ bool result =
+ // Note: schemes statically defined in secureSchemes()
+ url.SchemeIs(url::kHttpsScheme) || url.SchemeIs(url::kAboutScheme) ||
+ url.SchemeIs(url::kDataScheme) || url.SchemeIs(url::kWssScheme) ||
+ // Note: schemes "dynamically" registered with
+ // SchemeRegistry::registerURLSchemeAsSecure.
+ url.SchemeIs(kChromeUIScheme);
Mike West 2016/07/19 14:39:32 As you note, this isn't pretty. It also doesn't se
carlosk 2016/07/19 16:32:16 Acknowledged. Then we indeed need to solve http://
+ return result;
+}
+
+// Should return the same value as SecurityOrigin::isLocal and
+// SchemeRegistry::shouldTreatURLSchemeAsLocal.
+bool HasLocalScheme(const GURL& url) {
+ // TODO(carlosk): Same registration problem as described in
+ // HasPotentiallySecureScheme applies here. See http://crbug.com/627502.
Mike West 2016/07/19 14:39:31 S.
carlosk 2016/07/19 16:32:15 Done.
+ bool result =
+ // Note: schemes statically defined in schemesWithUniqueOrigins()
+ url.SchemeIs(url::kAboutScheme) || url.SchemeIs(url::kJavaScriptScheme) ||
+ url.SchemeIs(url::kDataScheme) ||
+ // Note: schemes "dynamically" registered with
+ // SchemeRegistry::registerURLSchemeAsNoAccess. There's no content/
+ // re-definition of kChromeNativeScheme.
+ url.SchemeIs("chrome-native");
Mike West 2016/07/19 14:39:32 Ditto. I'm not an OWNER of this code, but reaching
carlosk 2016/07/19 16:32:16 Agreed.
+ return result;
+}
+
+// Should return the same value as the resource URL checks made inside
+// MixedContentChecker::isMixedContent.
+bool IsUrlPotentiallySecure(const GURL& url) {
+ // TODO(carlosk): secure origin checks don't match between content and Blink
+ // hence this implementation here instead of a direct call to IsOriginSecure
+ // (in origin_util.cc). See http://crbug.com/629059.
Mike West 2016/07/19 14:39:32 S.
carlosk 2016/07/19 16:32:16 Done.
+ bool is_secure = false;
+
+ // Mimics SecurityOrigin::isSecure.
+ if (HasPotentiallySecureScheme(url) ||
+ (url.SchemeIsFileSystem() &&
+ HasPotentiallySecureScheme(*url.inner_url())) ||
+ (url.SchemeIsBlob() &&
+ HasPotentiallySecureScheme(GURL(url.GetContent()))) ||
+ IsOriginWhiteListedTrustworthy(url)) {
+ is_secure |= true;
+ }
+
+ // Mimics SecurityOrigin::isPotentiallyTrustworthy without duplicating (much)
+ // of the checks already done previously.
+ if (HasLocalScheme(url) || net::IsLocalhost(url.HostNoBrackets()))
+ is_secure |= true;
+
+ // TODO(mkwst): Remove this once 'localhost' is no longer considered
+ // potentially trustworthy.
+ if (is_secure && url.SchemeIs(url::kHttpScheme) &&
+ net::IsLocalHostname(url.HostNoBrackets(), nullptr)) {
+ is_secure = false;
+ }
Mike West 2016/07/19 14:39:32 Should be gone by the time you land this (if I can
carlosk 2016/07/19 16:32:16 Acknowledged.
+
+ return is_secure;
+}
+
+// This method should return the same results as
+// SchemeRegistry::shouldTreatURLSchemeAsRestrictingMixedContent.
+bool DoesOriginSchemeRestricsMixedContent(const url::Origin& origin) {
+ return origin.scheme() == url::kHttpsScheme;
+}
+
+bool ShouldTreatURLSchemeAsCORSEnabled(const GURL& url) {
+ // TODO(carlosk): for CORS schemes we have the exact same issue as for the
+ // secure schemes above. See callers to and references in
+ // WebSecurityPolicy::registerURLSchemeAsCORSEnabled. See
+ // http://crbug.com/627502.
Mike West 2016/07/19 14:39:31 S.
carlosk 2016/07/19 16:32:15 Done.
+ return
+ // Note: CORS schemes statically defined in CORSEnabledSchemes()
+ url.SchemeIsHTTPOrHTTPS() || url.SchemeIs(url::kDataScheme) ||
+ // Note: CORS schemes "dynamically" registered in
+ // RenderThreadImpl::RegisterSchemes.
+ url.SchemeIs(kChromeUIScheme);
+}
+
+const char* TypeNameFromContext(RequestContextType context) {
+ // Note: the static_cast below is guaranteed by the static asserts in
+ // content/child/web_url_request_util.cc.
+ return blink::WebMixedContent::requestContextName(
+ static_cast<blink::WebURLRequest::RequestContext>(context));
+}
+
+blink::WebMixedContent::ContextType MixedContextTypeFromContext(
+ RequestContextType context,
+ bool block_mixed_plugin_content) {
+ // Note: the static_cast below is guaranteed by the static asserts in
+ // content/child/web_url_request_util.cc.
+ return blink::WebMixedContent::contextTypeFromRequestContext(
+ static_cast<blink::WebURLRequest::RequestContext>(context),
+ block_mixed_plugin_content);
+}
+
+void LogToConsoleAboutFetch(FrameTreeNode* mixed_content_node,
+ NavigationHandleImpl* handle_impl,
+ const GURL& url,
+ bool allowed) {
+ FrameTreeNode* tree_node = handle_impl->frame_tree_node();
+ // TODO(carlosk): we should only use the very tree_node here for the form
+ // submission case. (D)CHECK for that when we get there. For now just check
+ // this is not the root node.
+ DCHECK(tree_node->parent());
+ RequestContextType request_context_type =
+ handle_impl->fetch_request_context_type();
+
+ std::string message = base::StringPrintf(
+ "Mixed Content: The page at '%s' was loaded over HTTPS, but requested an "
+ "insecure %s '%s'. %s",
+ mixed_content_node->current_url().spec().c_str(),
+ TypeNameFromContext(request_context_type), url.spec().c_str(),
+ allowed ? "This content should also be served over HTTPS."
+ : "This request has been blocked; the content must be served "
+ "over HTTPS.");
+ ConsoleMessageLevel messageLevel =
+ allowed ? ConsoleMessageLevel::CONSOLE_MESSAGE_LEVEL_WARNING
+ : ConsoleMessageLevel::CONSOLE_MESSAGE_LEVEL_ERROR;
+ tree_node->current_frame_host()->AddMessageToConsole(messageLevel, message);
Mike West 2016/07/19 14:39:32 s/tree_node/mixed_content_node/ (or `tree_node->pa
carlosk 2016/07/19 16:32:16 That makes sense but MixedContentChecker disagrees
+}
+
+} // namespace
+
+namespace content {
+
+MixedContentNavigationThrottle::MixedContentNavigationThrottle(
+ NavigationHandle* navigation_handle)
+ : NavigationThrottle(navigation_handle) {}
+
+MixedContentNavigationThrottle::~MixedContentNavigationThrottle() {}
+
+ThrottleCheckResult MixedContentNavigationThrottle::WillStartRequest() {
+ NavigationHandleImpl* handle_impl =
+ static_cast<NavigationHandleImpl*>(navigation_handle());
+ FrameTreeNode* node = handle_impl->frame_tree_node();
+
+ // Find the parent node with mixed content, if any.
+ FrameTreeNode* mixed_content_node =
+ InWhichFrameIsContentMixed(node, navigation_handle()->GetURL());
+ if (!mixed_content_node)
+ return ThrottleCheckResult::PROCEED;
+
+ // From this point on we know this is not a main frame navigation and that
+ // there is mixed-content. Now let's decide if it's OK to proceed with it.
+
+ const WebPreferences& prefs =
+ node->current_frame_host()->render_view_host()->GetWebkitPreferences();
Mike West 2016/07/19 14:39:32 The mixed content prefs aren't renderer-specific,
carlosk 2016/07/19 16:32:16 Some come from CLI, some from the renderer/Blink a
+
+ // If we're in strict mode, we'll automagically fail everything, and
+ // intentionally skip the client/embedder checks in order to prevent degrading
+ // the site's security UI.
+ bool block_all_mixed_content = !!(
+ mixed_content_node->current_replication_state().insecure_request_policy &
+ blink::kBlockAllMixedContent);
+ bool strictMode =
+ prefs.strict_mixed_content_checking || block_all_mixed_content;
+
+ blink::WebMixedContent::ContextType mixed_context_type =
+ MixedContextTypeFromContext(handle_impl->fetch_request_context_type(),
+ prefs.block_mixed_plugin_content);
+
+ if (!ShouldTreatURLSchemeAsCORSEnabled(navigation_handle()->GetURL())) {
+ mixed_context_type =
+ blink::WebMixedContent::ContextType::OptionallyBlockable;
+ }
+
+ bool allowed = false;
+ ContentBrowserClient* browser_client = GetContentClient()->browser();
+ RenderFrameHostDelegate* frame_host_delegate =
+ node->current_frame_host()->delegate();
+ switch (mixed_context_type) {
+ case blink::WebMixedContent::ContextType::OptionallyBlockable:
+ allowed =
+ !strictMode &&
+ browser_client->ShouldAllowDisplayingInsecureContent(
+ prefs.allow_displaying_insecure_content,
+ navigation_handle()->GetURL(), handle_impl->GetWebContents());
+ if (allowed)
+ frame_host_delegate->DidDisplayInsecureContent();
+ break;
+
+ case blink::WebMixedContent::ContextType::Blockable: {
+ bool shouldAskEmbedder =
+ !strictMode && (!prefs.strictly_block_blockable_mixed_content ||
+ prefs.allow_running_insecure_content);
+ allowed =
+ shouldAskEmbedder &&
+ browser_client->ShouldAllowRunningInsecureContent(
+ prefs.allow_running_insecure_content,
+ mixed_content_node->current_origin(),
+ navigation_handle()->GetURL(), handle_impl->GetWebContents());
+ if (allowed) {
+ const GURL& origin_url = mixed_content_node->current_url().GetOrigin();
+ frame_host_delegate->DidRunInsecureContent(
+ origin_url, navigation_handle()->GetURL());
+ browser_client->RecordURLMetric(
+ "ContentSettings.MixedScript.RanMixedScript", origin_url);
Mike West 2016/07/19 14:39:31 I wonder if anyone is looking at these metrics...
carlosk 2016/07/19 16:32:16 Don't we all?
+ }
+ break;
+ }
+
+ case blink::WebMixedContent::ContextType::ShouldBeBlockable:
+ allowed = !strictMode;
+ if (allowed)
+ frame_host_delegate->DidDisplayInsecureContent();
+ break;
+
+ case blink::WebMixedContent::ContextType::NotMixedContent:
+ NOTREACHED();
+ break;
+ };
+
+ LogToConsoleAboutFetch(mixed_content_node, handle_impl,
+ navigation_handle()->GetURL(), allowed);
+
+ return allowed ? ThrottleCheckResult::PROCEED : ThrottleCheckResult::CANCEL;
+}
+
+ThrottleCheckResult MixedContentNavigationThrottle::WillRedirectRequest() {
+ // Upon redirects the same checks are to be executed as for requests.
+ return MixedContentNavigationThrottle::WillStartRequest();
+}
+
+ThrottleCheckResult MixedContentNavigationThrottle::WillProcessResponse() {
+ // TODO(carlosk): at this point we must check the final security level of
+ // the connection! Does it use an outdated protocol? See
+ // MixedContentChecker::handleCertificateError
+ return ThrottleCheckResult::PROCEED;
+}
+
+FrameTreeNode* MixedContentNavigationThrottle::InWhichFrameIsContentMixed(
+ FrameTreeNode* node,
+ const GURL& url) {
+ // Main frame navigations cannot be mixed content.
+ // TODO(carlosk): except for form submissions which will be dealt with later.
+ if (node->IsMainFrame())
+ return nullptr;
+
+ // If the navigated URL is potentially secure there's no mixed-content (at
+ // request time at least).
+ if (IsUrlPotentiallySecure(url))
+ return nullptr;
+
+ // TODO(carlosk): don't we need to check more than just the immediate parent
+ // and the root? Is it always the case that these two are the only sources for
+ // obtaining the "origin of the security context"? http://crbug.com/623486
Mike West 2016/07/19 14:39:32 S.
carlosk 2016/07/19 16:32:15 Done.
+
+ // If neither the parent nor root frames' origins are secure, there is no
+ // mixed content.
+ FrameTreeNode* mixed_content_node = nullptr;
+
+ // Checks if the root or immediate parent frame's origin are secure.
+ FrameTreeNode* root = node->frame_tree()->root();
+ FrameTreeNode* parent = node->parent();
+ if (DoesOriginSchemeRestricsMixedContent(root->current_origin()))
+ mixed_content_node = root;
+ else if (DoesOriginSchemeRestricsMixedContent(parent->current_origin()))
+ mixed_content_node = parent;
+
+ return mixed_content_node;
+}
+
+// static
+bool MixedContentNavigationThrottle::IsMixedContentForTesting(
+ const GURL& origin_url,
+ const GURL& url) {
+ const url::Origin origin(origin_url);
+ return !IsUrlPotentiallySecure(url) &&
+ DoesOriginSchemeRestricsMixedContent(origin);
+}
+
+} // namespace content

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698