Revert of [wasm] Also test structured stack trace

Revert of [wasm] Also test structured stack trace (patchset #4 id:60001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1875153002/ )

Reason for revert:
Breaks:
https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux64%20-%20custom%20snapshot%20-%20debug/builds/6322

Original issue's description:
> [wasm] Also test structured stack trace
>
> This extends the wasm test case which only checks the "simple"
> string-variant of the stack trace.
> It checks the return values of the getFunctionName, getLineNumber,
> getFileName and toString methods.
>
> R=ahaas@chromium.org, jfb@chromium.org, titzer@chromium.org
> BUG=

TBR=ahaas@chromium.org,jfb@chromium.org,titzer@chromium.org,clemensh@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=

Committed: https://crrev.com/921381bc1329595d8f51aef99f8331045b5ef0cd
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35670}

[Michael Achenbach, 2016-04-20 16:23:00]

Created Revert of [wasm] Also test structured stack trace

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-04-20 16:23:12]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1903293002/1
View timeline at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-timeline/1903293002/1

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-04-20 16:23:31]

Description was changed from

==========
Revert of [wasm] Also test structured stack trace (patchset #4 id:60001 of
https://codereview.chromium.org/1875153002/ )

Reason for revert:
Breaks:
https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux64%20-%20custom%20s...

Original issue's description:
> [wasm] Also test structured stack trace
> 
> This extends the wasm test case which only checks the "simple"
> string-variant of the stack trace.
> It checks the return values of the getFunctionName, getLineNumber,
> getFileName and toString methods.
> 
> R=ahaas@chromium.org, jfb@chromium.org, titzer@chromium.org
> BUG=

TBR=ahaas@chromium.org,jfb@chromium.org,titzer@chromium.org,clemensh@chromium...
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=
==========

to

==========
Revert of [wasm] Also test structured stack trace (patchset #4 id:60001 of
https://codereview.chromium.org/1875153002/ )

Reason for revert:
Breaks:
https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux64%20-%20custom%20s...

Original issue's description:
> [wasm] Also test structured stack trace
> 
> This extends the wasm test case which only checks the "simple"
> string-variant of the stack trace.
> It checks the return values of the getFunctionName, getLineNumber,
> getFileName and toString methods.
> 
> R=ahaas@chromium.org, jfb@chromium.org, titzer@chromium.org
> BUG=

TBR=ahaas@chromium.org,jfb@chromium.org,titzer@chromium.org,clemensh@chromium...
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=
==========

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-04-20 16:23:32]

Committed patchset #1 (id:1)

[Clemens Hammacher, 2016-04-20 16:25:32]

On 2016/04/20 at 16:23:32, commit-bot wrote:
> Committed patchset #1 (id:1)

Any insight why it fails on some machines? Why don't they "see" the added
function in mjsunit.js?

[Clemens Hammacher, 2016-04-21 07:04:11]

On 2016/04/20 at 16:25:32, Clemens Hammacher wrote:
> On 2016/04/20 at 16:23:32, commit-bot wrote:
> > Committed patchset #1 (id:1)
> 
> Any insight why it fails on some machines? Why don't they "see" the added
function in mjsunit.js?

OK, it seems that at least one machine builds a bigger snapshot, which includes
the mjsunit.js. And this snapshot is not rebuilt on changes in that file. Looks
like a missing build dependence?

[Clemens Hammacher, 2016-04-21 07:45:41]

On 2016/04/21 at 07:04:11, Clemens Hammacher wrote:
> OK, it seems that at least one machine builds a bigger snapshot, which
includes the mjsunit.js. And this snapshot is not rebuilt on changes in that
file. Looks like a missing build dependence?

Thanks for fixing in https://codereview.chromium.org/1904013002/

[nodir1, 2016-04-22 18:44:34]

Description was changed from

==========
Revert of [wasm] Also test structured stack trace (patchset #4 id:60001 of
https://codereview.chromium.org/1875153002/ )

Reason for revert:
Breaks:
https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux64%20-%20custom%20s...

Original issue's description:
> [wasm] Also test structured stack trace
> 
> This extends the wasm test case which only checks the "simple"
> string-variant of the stack trace.
> It checks the return values of the getFunctionName, getLineNumber,
> getFileName and toString methods.
> 
> R=ahaas@chromium.org, jfb@chromium.org, titzer@chromium.org
> BUG=

TBR=ahaas@chromium.org,jfb@chromium.org,titzer@chromium.org,clemensh@chromium...
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=
==========

to

==========
Revert of [wasm] Also test structured stack trace (patchset #4 id:60001 of
https://codereview.chromium.org/1875153002/ )

Reason for revert:
Breaks:
https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux64%20-%20custom%20s...

Original issue's description:
> [wasm] Also test structured stack trace
>
> This extends the wasm test case which only checks the "simple"
> string-variant of the stack trace.
> It checks the return values of the getFunctionName, getLineNumber,
> getFileName and toString methods.
>
> R=ahaas@chromium.org, jfb@chromium.org, titzer@chromium.org
> BUG=

TBR=ahaas@chromium.org,jfb@chromium.org,titzer@chromium.org,clemensh@chromium...
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=

Committed: https://crrev.com/921381bc1329595d8f51aef99f8331045b5ef0cd
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35670}
==========

[nodir1, 2016-04-22 18:44:35]

Patchset 1 (id:??) landed as
https://crrev.com/921381bc1329595d8f51aef99f8331045b5ef0cd
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35670}