Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(654)

Issues Search
    My Issues | Starred     Open | Closed | All

Side by Side Diff: xfa_specific/fx/test_case_0026/test_summary.txt

Issue 1900933002: Rename xfa to xfa_specific. (Closed) Base URL: https://pdfium.googlesource.com/pdfium_tests@master
Patch Set: Created 4 years, 8 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View unified diff | Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « xfa_specific/fx/test_case_0026/Test_NumericField_expected.pdf.0.png ('k') | xfa_specific/fx/test_case_0027/Test_PasswordField.pdf » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Toggle Intra-line Diffs ('i') | Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
OLDNEW
1 -Test process 1 -Test process
2 2
3 1. Test program inputs 6.66 to the first text field. 3 1. Test program inputs 6.66 to the first text field.
4 4
5 -Pass condition 5 -Pass condition
6 6
7 1. Test program verifies first text field contains the value of 6.66 7 1. Test program verifies first text field contains the value of 6.66
8 8
9 AND 9 AND
10 10
11 2. Test program verifies output image equals the input test image in every pixel . 11 2. Test program verifies output image equals the input test image in every pixel .
12 12
13 -Test purpose 13 -Test purpose
14 14
15 1. This test aims to test XFA widget's correct rendering of the double value. 15 1. This test aims to test XFA widget's correct rendering of the double value.
OLDNEW
« no previous file with comments | « xfa_specific/fx/test_case_0026/Test_NumericField_expected.pdf.0.png ('k') | xfa_specific/fx/test_case_0027/Test_PasswordField.pdf » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698