Plumb a Browser->GPU surface destruction message for Android VDAs

content/common/gpu/media/avda_surface_tracker.h

+// Copyright 2016 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#ifndef CONTENT_COMMON_GPU_MEDIA_AVDA_SURFACE_MANAGER_H_
+#define CONTENT_COMMON_GPU_MEDIA_AVDA_SURFACE_MANAGER_H_
+
+#include "base/observer_list.h"
+#include "content/common/content_export.h"
+
+namespace content {
+
+class SurfaceDestructionObserver {

[no sievers, 2016/04/19 23:30:17]

nit: This only has one method so could be a base::Callback.

[watk, 2016/04/22 02:48:55]

Done.

+ public:
+  // The given surface is being destroyed. If the observer owns the surface
+  // it should quickly release it before returning from this because this will
+  // be called while blocking the Browser UI thread.
+  virtual void OnDestroyingSurface(int surface_id) = 0;
+
+ protected:
+  ~SurfaceDestructionObserver() {}
+};
+
+// AVDASurfaceTracker provides AndroidVideoDecodeAccelerators a way to register
+// as observers of surface destruction. This is important because Android
+// SurfaceView Surfaces can be destroyed by the framework at any time and we
+// must stop rendering to them before returning from onSurfaceDestroyed().
+class AVDASurfaceTracker {
+ public:
+  static AVDASurfaceTracker* GetInstance();
+
+  AVDASurfaceTracker();
+  ~AVDASurfaceTracker();
+
+  void AddSurfaceDestructionObserver(SurfaceDestructionObserver* observer);

[no sievers, 2016/04/18 23:41:25]

I don't see any call sites to this.

I'm asking also to figure out if this message should be routed to the stub
instead. I thought the decoders were associated with a stub already.

[watk, 2016/04/19 21:15:08]

I forgot to mention that I was going to do the AVDA changes in a follow up. But
AVDA instances will register themselves as observers whenever they look up a
Surface with GpuSurfaceLookup.

VDAs are given a pointer to a stub, but stubs don't keep a pointer to VDAs.
They're constructed here
https://code.google.com/p/chromium/codesearch#chromium/src/content/common/gpu....
GpuVideoDecodeAccelerators observe stub destruction to delete themselves.

I hadn't considered routing the message directly to the stub (or
GpuVideoDecodeAccelerator is probably the place). Would that mean passing the
Browser->Gpu channel down to where GVDA is constructed so that it could install
a filter on it? There might be multiple GVDAs, and we don't know which one owns
the surface, so is it possible to set it up so that they all see the message,
but none of them say they handled it?

That's probably not very clear if you haven't looked at the VDA infrastructure
in a while.. Let me know if I can clarify.

+  void RemoveSurfaceDestructionObserver(SurfaceDestructionObserver* observer);
+
+  // Called in response to a message from the Browser indicating that the given
+  // surface is in the process of being destroyed.
+  void NotifyDestroyingSurface(int surface_id);
+
+ private:
+  base::ObserverList<SurfaceDestructionObserver> observers_;
+  DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(AVDASurfaceTracker);
+};
+
+}  // namespace content
+
+#endif  // CONTENT_COMMON_GPU_MEDIA_AVDA_SURFACE_MANAGER_H_