Issue 18773003: ARM: Add support for temp double registers in Crankshaft.

Keyboard Shortcuts

	File
u :	up to issue
j / k :	jump to file after / before current file
J / K :	jump to next file with a comment after / before current file
	Side-by-side diff
i :	toggle intra-line diffs
e :	expand all comments
c :	collapse all comments
s :	toggle showing all comments
n / p :	next / previous diff chunk or comment
N / P :	next / previous comment
<Up> / <Down> :	next / previous line

	Issue
u :	up to list of issues
j / k :	jump to patch after / before current patch
o / <Enter> :	open current patch in side-by-side view
i :	open current patch in unified diff view

	Issue List
j / k :	jump to issue after / before current issue
o / <Enter> :	open current issue

Issue 18773003: ARM: Add support for temp double registers in Crankshaft. (Closed)

Created:
7 years, 5 months ago by Rodolph Perfetta

Modified:
6 years, 6 months ago

Reviewers:
Sven Panne, ulan, Vyacheslav Egorov (Chromium), Kevin Millikin (Chromium)

CC:
v8-dev

Base URL:
https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge

Visibility:
Public.

More Reviews

Description

ARM: Add support for temp double registers in Crankshaft. BUG=none TEST=none

Patch Set 1 #

Created: 7 years, 5 months ago

Download [raw] [tar.bz2]

	Unified diffs	Side-by-side diffs	Stats (+44 lines, -13 lines)			Patch
M	src/arm/lithium-arm.h	View	1 chunk	+1 line, -0 lines	0 comments	Download
M	src/arm/lithium-arm.cc	View	8 chunks	+25 lines, -11 lines	0 comments	Download
M	src/lithium.h	View	2 chunks	+5 lines, -0 lines	0 comments	Download
M	src/lithium.cc	View	1 chunk	+3 lines, -0 lines	0 comments	Download
M	src/lithium-allocator.cc	View	3 chunks	+10 lines, -2 lines	0 comments	Download

Messages

Total messages: 4 (0 generated)

Expand Messages | Collapse Messages

ulan

Sven, Slava, Kevin, could you please take a look? Maybe you can suggest more uniform ...

7 years, 5 months ago (2013-07-22 09:51:12 UTC) #2

Sven Panne

Do we still need this after https://codereview.chromium.org/302453008?

6 years, 6 months ago (2014-06-10 13:30:29 UTC) #3

Rodolph Perfetta

6 years, 6 months ago (2014-06-10 13:39:03 UTC) #4

On 2014/06/10 13:30:29, Sven Panne wrote:
> Do we still need this after https://codereview.chromium.org/302453008

No, that was the initial attempt, I'll close it.

Expand Messages | Collapse Messages