Chromium Code Reviews| Index: test/mjsunit/wasm/stack.js |
| diff --git a/test/mjsunit/wasm/stack.js b/test/mjsunit/wasm/stack.js |
| index ed05517ae5070bb1361c5f23ef3c3618beed7114..d2b0be02f37e89b8e7e3583a9e844a58378dca87 100644 |
| --- a/test/mjsunit/wasm/stack.js |
| +++ b/test/mjsunit/wasm/stack.js |
| @@ -7,34 +7,92 @@ |
| load("test/mjsunit/wasm/wasm-constants.js"); |
| load("test/mjsunit/wasm/wasm-module-builder.js"); |
| -var expected = "Error\n" + |
| - // The line numbers below will change as this test gains / loses lines.. |
| - " at STACK (stack.js:24:11)\n" + // -- |
| - " at <WASM> (<anonymous>)\n" + // TODO(jfb): wasm stack here. |
| - " at testStack (stack.js:38:18)\n" + // -- |
| - " at stack.js:40:3"; // -- |
| - |
| // The stack trace contains file path, only keep "stack.js". |
| function stripPath(s) { |
| return s.replace(/[^ (]*stack\.js/g, "stack.js"); |
| } |
| +// Check a property for the return values of a function called on each frame. |
| +Array.prototype.verify = function(frames, func_name, check_func) { |
| + assertEquals(this.length, frames.length, "number of frames mismatch"); |
| + this.forEach( |
| + function(element, index) { |
| + var frame = frames[index]; |
| + check_func(element, (frame[func_name])()); |
| + } |
| + ); |
| +} |
| + |
| +// Check for every frame that a certain method returns the |
| +// expected value for every frame. |
| +Array.prototype.verifyEquals = function(frames, func_name) { |
| + this.verify(frames, func_name, function(exp, cur) { |
| + assertEquals(exp, cur, func_name + "()"); |
| + }); |
| +} |
| + |
| +// Check for every frame that a certain method has a return value |
| +// that contains the expected pattern for every frame. |
| +Array.prototype.verifyContains = function(frames, func_name) { |
| + this.verify(frames, func_name, function(exp, cur) { |
| + assertContains(cur, exp, func_name + "()"); |
| + }); |
| +} |
| + |
| +// Check for every frame that a certain method returns undefined |
| +// when expected. |
| +Array.prototype.verifyUndefined = function(frames, func_name) { |
| + this.verify(frames, func_name, function(exp, cur) { |
| + if ((cur == undefined) != !!exp) |
| + assertEquals((exp ? '' : 'not ') + 'undefined', cur, func_name + "()"); |
| + }); |
| +} |
| + |
| + |
| var stack; |
| function STACK() { |
| var e = new Error(); |
| stack = e.stack; |
| } |
| -(function testStack() { |
| - var builder = new WasmModuleBuilder(); |
| +var builder = new WasmModuleBuilder(); |
| + |
| +builder.addImport("func", [kAstStmt]); |
| - builder.addImport("func", [kAstStmt]); |
| +builder.addFunction("main", [kAstStmt]) |
| + .addBody([kExprCallImport, 0]) |
| + .exportAs("main"); |
| - builder.addFunction(undefined, [kAstStmt]) |
| - .addBody([kExprCallImport, 0]) |
| - .exportAs("main"); |
| +var module = builder.instantiate({func: STACK}); |
| + |
| +(function testSimpleStack() { |
| + var expected_string = "Error\n" + |
| + // The line numbers below will change as this test gains / loses lines.. |
| + " at STACK (stack.js:54:11)\n" + // -- |
| + " at <WASM> (<anonymous>)\n" + // TODO(jfb): wasm stack here. |
| + " at testSimpleStack (stack.js:76:18)\n" + // -- |
| + " at stack.js:78:3"; // -- |
| - var module = builder.instantiate({func: STACK}); |
| module.exports.main(); |
| - assertEquals(expected, stripPath(stack)); |
| + assertEquals(expected_string, stripPath(stack)); |
| +})(); |
| + |
| +// For the remaining tests, collect the Callsite objects instead of just a |
| +// string: |
| +Error.prepareStackTrace = function(error, frames) { |
| + return frames; |
| +}; |
| + |
| +(function testStackFrames() { |
| + module.exports.main(); |
| + |
| + ["STACK", "<WASM>", "testStackFrames", null] |
| + .verifyEquals(stack, "getFunctionName"); |
| + [54, null, 87, 98] |
| + .verifyEquals(stack, "getLineNumber"); |
| + ["stack.js", null, "stack.js", "stack.js"] |
| + .verifyContains(stack, "getFileName"); |
| + ["stack.js:54:11", "<WASM>", "stack.js:87:18", "stack.js:98:3"] |
| + .verifyContains(stack, "toString"); |
| + // TODO(clemensh): add a isWasm() method or similar, and test it |
| })(); |
|
JF
2016/04/11 19:35:09
I find that structure hard to read, IMO it would b
Clemens Hammacher
2016/04/12 08:57:03
Sure, that's nicer. Changed it accordingly.
|