Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(576)

Unified Diff: sandbox/win/src/handle_policy.cc

Issue 1851213002: Remove sandbox on Windows. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: fix nacl compile issues Created 4 years, 9 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « sandbox/win/src/handle_policy.h ('k') | sandbox/win/src/handle_policy_test.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: sandbox/win/src/handle_policy.cc
diff --git a/sandbox/win/src/handle_policy.cc b/sandbox/win/src/handle_policy.cc
deleted file mode 100644
index 1023030792741636ef34d7c30e78c82a0a26082d..0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
--- a/sandbox/win/src/handle_policy.cc
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,92 +0,0 @@
-// Copyright (c) 2012 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
-// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
-// found in the LICENSE file.
-
-#include "sandbox/win/src/handle_policy.h"
-
-#include <string>
-
-#include "base/win/scoped_handle.h"
-#include "sandbox/win/src/broker_services.h"
-#include "sandbox/win/src/ipc_tags.h"
-#include "sandbox/win/src/policy_engine_opcodes.h"
-#include "sandbox/win/src/policy_params.h"
-#include "sandbox/win/src/sandbox_types.h"
-#include "sandbox/win/src/sandbox_utils.h"
-
-namespace sandbox {
-
-bool HandlePolicy::GenerateRules(const wchar_t* type_name,
- TargetPolicy::Semantics semantics,
- LowLevelPolicy* policy) {
- PolicyRule duplicate_rule(ASK_BROKER);
-
- switch (semantics) {
- case TargetPolicy::HANDLES_DUP_ANY: {
- if (!duplicate_rule.AddNumberMatch(IF_NOT, HandleTarget::TARGET,
- ::GetCurrentProcessId(), EQUAL)) {
- return false;
- }
- break;
- }
-
- case TargetPolicy::HANDLES_DUP_BROKER: {
- if (!duplicate_rule.AddNumberMatch(IF, HandleTarget::TARGET,
- ::GetCurrentProcessId(), EQUAL)) {
- return false;
- }
- break;
- }
-
- default:
- return false;
- }
- if (!duplicate_rule.AddStringMatch(IF, HandleTarget::NAME, type_name,
- CASE_INSENSITIVE)) {
- return false;
- }
- if (!policy->AddRule(IPC_DUPLICATEHANDLEPROXY_TAG, &duplicate_rule)) {
- return false;
- }
- return true;
-}
-
-DWORD HandlePolicy::DuplicateHandleProxyAction(EvalResult eval_result,
- HANDLE source_handle,
- DWORD target_process_id,
- HANDLE* target_handle,
- DWORD desired_access,
- DWORD options) {
- // The only action supported is ASK_BROKER which means duplicate the handle.
- if (ASK_BROKER != eval_result) {
- return ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED;
- }
-
- base::win::ScopedHandle remote_target_process;
- if (target_process_id != ::GetCurrentProcessId()) {
- // Sandboxed children are dynamic, so we check that manually.
- if (!BrokerServicesBase::GetInstance()->IsActiveTarget(target_process_id)) {
- return ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED;
- }
-
- remote_target_process.Set(::OpenProcess(PROCESS_DUP_HANDLE, FALSE,
- target_process_id));
- if (!remote_target_process.IsValid())
- return ::GetLastError();
- }
-
- // If the policy didn't block us and we have no valid target, then the broker
- // (this process) is the valid target.
- HANDLE target_process = remote_target_process.IsValid() ?
- remote_target_process.Get() : ::GetCurrentProcess();
- if (!::DuplicateHandle(::GetCurrentProcess(), source_handle, target_process,
- target_handle, desired_access, FALSE,
- options)) {
- return ::GetLastError();
- }
-
- return ERROR_SUCCESS;
-}
-
-} // namespace sandbox
-
« no previous file with comments | « sandbox/win/src/handle_policy.h ('k') | sandbox/win/src/handle_policy_test.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698