Remove sandbox on Windows.

sandbox/win/src/policy_opcodes_unittest.cc

Index: sandbox/win/src/policy_opcodes_unittest.cc
diff --git a/sandbox/win/src/policy_opcodes_unittest.cc b/sandbox/win/src/policy_opcodes_unittest.cc
deleted file mode 100644
index f8c210e8762db8c16ad95dd0ae62ccc37a0411e6..0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
--- a/sandbox/win/src/policy_opcodes_unittest.cc
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,372 +0,0 @@
-// Copyright (c) 2006-2008 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
-// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
-// found in the LICENSE file.
-
-#include <stddef.h>
-#include <stdint.h>
-
-#include "sandbox/win/src/policy_engine_opcodes.h"
-#include "sandbox/win/src/policy_engine_params.h"
-#include "sandbox/win/src/sandbox_nt_types.h"
-#include "sandbox/win/src/sandbox_types.h"
-#include "testing/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h"
-
-
-#define INIT_GLOBAL_RTL(member) \
-  g_nt.member = reinterpret_cast<member##Function>( \
-  ::GetProcAddress(ntdll, #member)); \
-  if (NULL == g_nt.member) \
-  return false
-
-namespace sandbox {
-
-const size_t kOpcodeMemory = 1024;
-
-SANDBOX_INTERCEPT NtExports g_nt;
-
-bool SetupNtdllImports() {
-    HMODULE ntdll = ::GetModuleHandle(kNtdllName);
-
-    INIT_GLOBAL_RTL(RtlAllocateHeap);
-    INIT_GLOBAL_RTL(RtlAnsiStringToUnicodeString);
-    INIT_GLOBAL_RTL(RtlCompareUnicodeString);
-    INIT_GLOBAL_RTL(RtlCreateHeap);
-    INIT_GLOBAL_RTL(RtlDestroyHeap);
-    INIT_GLOBAL_RTL(RtlFreeHeap);
-    INIT_GLOBAL_RTL(_strnicmp);
-    INIT_GLOBAL_RTL(strlen);
-    INIT_GLOBAL_RTL(wcslen);
-
-  return true;
-}
-
-TEST(PolicyEngineTest, ParameterSetTest) {
-  void* pv1 = reinterpret_cast<void*>(0x477EAA5);
-  const void* pv2 = reinterpret_cast<void*>(0x987654);
-  ParameterSet pset1 = ParamPickerMake(pv1);
-  ParameterSet pset2 = ParamPickerMake(pv2);
-
-  // Test that we can store and retrieve a void pointer:
-  const void* result1 =0;
-  uint32_t result2 = 0;
-  EXPECT_TRUE(pset1.Get(&result1));
-  EXPECT_TRUE(pv1 == result1);
-  EXPECT_FALSE(pset1.Get(&result2));
-  EXPECT_TRUE(pset2.Get(&result1));
-  EXPECT_TRUE(pv2 == result1);
-  EXPECT_FALSE(pset2.Get(&result2));
-
-  // Test that we can store and retrieve a uint32_t:
-  uint32_t number = 12747;
-  ParameterSet pset3 = ParamPickerMake(number);
-  EXPECT_FALSE(pset3.Get(&result1));
-  EXPECT_TRUE(pset3.Get(&result2));
-  EXPECT_EQ(number, result2);
-
-  // Test that we can store and retrieve a string:
-  const wchar_t* txt = L"S231L";
-  ParameterSet pset4 = ParamPickerMake(txt);
-  const wchar_t* result3 = NULL;
-  EXPECT_TRUE(pset4.Get(&result3));
-  EXPECT_EQ(0, wcscmp(txt, result3));
-}
-
-TEST(PolicyEngineTest, OpcodeConstraints) {
-  // Test that PolicyOpcode has no virtual functions
-  // because these objects are copied over to other processes
-  // so they cannot have vtables.
-  EXPECT_FALSE(__is_polymorphic(PolicyOpcode));
-  // Keep developers from adding smarts to the opcodes which should
-  // be pretty much a bag of bytes with a OO interface.
-  EXPECT_TRUE(__has_trivial_destructor(PolicyOpcode));
-  EXPECT_TRUE(__has_trivial_constructor(PolicyOpcode));
-  EXPECT_TRUE(__has_trivial_copy(PolicyOpcode));
-}
-
-TEST(PolicyEngineTest, TrueFalseOpcodes) {
-  void* dummy = NULL;
-  ParameterSet ppb1 = ParamPickerMake(dummy);
-  char memory[kOpcodeMemory];
-  OpcodeFactory opcode_maker(memory, sizeof(memory));
-
-  // This opcode always evaluates to true.
-  PolicyOpcode* op1 = opcode_maker.MakeOpAlwaysFalse(kPolNone);
-  ASSERT_NE(nullptr, op1);
-  EXPECT_EQ(EVAL_FALSE, op1->Evaluate(&ppb1, 1, NULL));
-  EXPECT_FALSE(op1->IsAction());
-
-  // This opcode always evaluates to false.
-  PolicyOpcode* op2 = opcode_maker.MakeOpAlwaysTrue(kPolNone);
-  ASSERT_NE(nullptr, op2);
-  EXPECT_EQ(EVAL_TRUE, op2->Evaluate(&ppb1, 1, NULL));
-
-  // Nulls not allowed on the params.
-  EXPECT_EQ(EVAL_ERROR, op2->Evaluate(NULL, 0, NULL));
-  EXPECT_EQ(EVAL_ERROR, op2->Evaluate(NULL, 1, NULL));
-
-  // True and False opcodes do not 'require' a number of parameters
-  EXPECT_EQ(EVAL_TRUE, op2->Evaluate(&ppb1, 0, NULL));
-  EXPECT_EQ(EVAL_TRUE, op2->Evaluate(&ppb1, 1, NULL));
-
-  // Test Inverting the logic. Note that inversion is done outside
-  // any particular opcode evaluation so no need to repeat for all
-  // opcodes.
-  PolicyOpcode* op3 = opcode_maker.MakeOpAlwaysFalse(kPolNegateEval);
-  ASSERT_NE(nullptr, op3);
-  EXPECT_EQ(EVAL_TRUE, op3->Evaluate(&ppb1, 1, NULL));
-  PolicyOpcode* op4 = opcode_maker.MakeOpAlwaysTrue(kPolNegateEval);
-  ASSERT_NE(nullptr, op4);
-  EXPECT_EQ(EVAL_FALSE, op4->Evaluate(&ppb1, 1, NULL));
-
-  // Test that we clear the match context
-  PolicyOpcode* op5 = opcode_maker.MakeOpAlwaysTrue(kPolClearContext);
-  ASSERT_NE(nullptr, op5);
-  MatchContext context;
-  context.position = 1;
-  context.options = kPolUseOREval;
-  EXPECT_EQ(EVAL_TRUE, op5->Evaluate(&ppb1, 1, &context));
-  EXPECT_EQ(0u, context.position);
-  MatchContext context2;
-  EXPECT_EQ(context2.options, context.options);
-}
-
-TEST(PolicyEngineTest, OpcodeMakerCase1) {
-  // Testing that the opcode maker does not overrun the
-  // supplied buffer. It should only be able to make 'count' opcodes.
-  void* dummy = NULL;
-  ParameterSet ppb1 = ParamPickerMake(dummy);
-
-  char memory[kOpcodeMemory];
-  OpcodeFactory opcode_maker(memory, sizeof(memory));
-  size_t count = sizeof(memory) / sizeof(PolicyOpcode);
-
-  for (size_t ix =0; ix != count; ++ix) {
-    PolicyOpcode* op = opcode_maker.MakeOpAlwaysFalse(kPolNone);
-    ASSERT_NE(nullptr, op);
-    EXPECT_EQ(EVAL_FALSE, op->Evaluate(&ppb1, 1, NULL));
-  }
-  // There should be no room more another opcode:
-  PolicyOpcode* op1 = opcode_maker.MakeOpAlwaysFalse(kPolNone);
-  ASSERT_EQ(nullptr, op1);
-}
-
-TEST(PolicyEngineTest, OpcodeMakerCase2) {
-  SetupNtdllImports();
-  // Testing that the opcode maker does not overrun the
-  // supplied buffer. It should only be able to make 'count' opcodes.
-  // The difference with the previous test is that this opcodes allocate
-  // the string 'txt2' inside the same buffer.
-  const wchar_t* txt1 = L"1234";
-  const wchar_t txt2[] = L"123";
-
-  ParameterSet ppb1 = ParamPickerMake(txt1);
-  MatchContext mc1;
-
-  char memory[kOpcodeMemory];
-  OpcodeFactory opcode_maker(memory, sizeof(memory));
-  size_t count = sizeof(memory) / (sizeof(PolicyOpcode) + sizeof(txt2));
-
-  // Test that it does not overrun the buffer.
-  for (size_t ix =0; ix != count; ++ix) {
-    PolicyOpcode* op = opcode_maker.MakeOpWStringMatch(0, txt2, 0,
-                                                       CASE_SENSITIVE,
-                                                       kPolClearContext);
-    ASSERT_NE(nullptr, op);
-    EXPECT_EQ(EVAL_TRUE, op->Evaluate(&ppb1, 1, &mc1));
-  }
-
-  // There should be no room more another opcode:
-  PolicyOpcode* op1 = opcode_maker.MakeOpWStringMatch(0, txt2, 0,
-                                                      CASE_SENSITIVE,
-                                                      kPolNone);
-  ASSERT_EQ(nullptr, op1);
-}
-
-TEST(PolicyEngineTest, IntegerOpcodes) {
-  const wchar_t* txt = L"abcdef";
-  uint32_t num1 = 42;
-  uint32_t num2 = 113377;
-
-  ParameterSet pp_wrong1 = ParamPickerMake(txt);
-  ParameterSet pp_num1 = ParamPickerMake(num1);
-  ParameterSet pp_num2 = ParamPickerMake(num2);
-
-  char memory[kOpcodeMemory];
-  OpcodeFactory opcode_maker(memory, sizeof(memory));
-
-  // Test basic match for uint32s 42 == 42 and 42 != 113377.
-  PolicyOpcode* op_m42 = opcode_maker.MakeOpNumberMatch(0, 42UL, kPolNone);
-  ASSERT_NE(nullptr, op_m42);
-  EXPECT_EQ(EVAL_TRUE, op_m42->Evaluate(&pp_num1, 1, NULL));
-  EXPECT_EQ(EVAL_FALSE, op_m42->Evaluate(&pp_num2, 1, NULL));
-  EXPECT_EQ(EVAL_ERROR, op_m42->Evaluate(&pp_wrong1, 1, NULL));
-
-  // Test basic match for void pointers.
-  const void* vp = NULL;
-  ParameterSet pp_num3 = ParamPickerMake(vp);
-  PolicyOpcode* op_vp_null = opcode_maker.MakeOpVoidPtrMatch(0, NULL,
-                                                             kPolNone);
-  ASSERT_NE(nullptr, op_vp_null);
-  EXPECT_EQ(EVAL_TRUE, op_vp_null->Evaluate(&pp_num3, 1, NULL));
-  EXPECT_EQ(EVAL_FALSE, op_vp_null->Evaluate(&pp_num1, 1, NULL));
-  EXPECT_EQ(EVAL_ERROR, op_vp_null->Evaluate(&pp_wrong1, 1, NULL));
-
-  // Basic range test [41 43] (inclusive).
-  PolicyOpcode* op_range1 =
-      opcode_maker.MakeOpNumberMatchRange(0, 41, 43, kPolNone);
-  ASSERT_NE(nullptr, op_range1);
-  EXPECT_EQ(EVAL_TRUE, op_range1->Evaluate(&pp_num1, 1, NULL));
-  EXPECT_EQ(EVAL_FALSE, op_range1->Evaluate(&pp_num2, 1, NULL));
-  EXPECT_EQ(EVAL_ERROR, op_range1->Evaluate(&pp_wrong1, 1, NULL));
-}
-
-TEST(PolicyEngineTest, LogicalOpcodes) {
-  char memory[kOpcodeMemory];
-  OpcodeFactory opcode_maker(memory, sizeof(memory));
-
-  uint32_t num1 = 0x10100702;
-  ParameterSet pp_num1 = ParamPickerMake(num1);
-
-  PolicyOpcode* op_and1 =
-      opcode_maker.MakeOpNumberAndMatch(0, 0x00100000, kPolNone);
-  ASSERT_NE(nullptr, op_and1);
-  EXPECT_EQ(EVAL_TRUE, op_and1->Evaluate(&pp_num1, 1, NULL));
-  PolicyOpcode* op_and2 =
-      opcode_maker.MakeOpNumberAndMatch(0, 0x00000001, kPolNone);
-  ASSERT_NE(nullptr, op_and2);
-  EXPECT_EQ(EVAL_FALSE, op_and2->Evaluate(&pp_num1, 1, NULL));
-}
-
-TEST(PolicyEngineTest, WCharOpcodes1) {
-  SetupNtdllImports();
-
-  const wchar_t* txt1 = L"the quick fox jumps over the lazy dog";
-  const wchar_t txt2[] = L"the quick";
-  const wchar_t txt3[] = L" fox jumps";
-  const wchar_t txt4[] = L"the lazy dog";
-  const wchar_t txt5[] = L"jumps over";
-  const wchar_t txt6[] = L"g";
-
-  ParameterSet pp_tc1 = ParamPickerMake(txt1);
-  char memory[kOpcodeMemory];
-  OpcodeFactory opcode_maker(memory, sizeof(memory));
-
-  PolicyOpcode* op1 = opcode_maker.MakeOpWStringMatch(0, txt2, 0,
-                                                      CASE_SENSITIVE,
-                                                      kPolNone);
-  ASSERT_NE(nullptr, op1);
-
-  // Simplest substring match from pos 0. It should be a successful match
-  // and the match context should be updated.
-  MatchContext mc1;
-  EXPECT_EQ(EVAL_TRUE, op1->Evaluate(&pp_tc1, 1, &mc1));
-  EXPECT_TRUE(_countof(txt2) == mc1.position + 1);
-
-  // Matching again should fail and the context should be unmodified.
-  EXPECT_EQ(EVAL_FALSE, op1->Evaluate(&pp_tc1, 1, &mc1));
-  EXPECT_TRUE(_countof(txt2) == mc1.position + 1);
-
-  // Using the same match context we should continue where we left
-  // in the previous successful match,
-  PolicyOpcode* op3 = opcode_maker.MakeOpWStringMatch(0, txt3, 0,
-                                                      CASE_SENSITIVE,
-                                                      kPolNone);
-  ASSERT_NE(nullptr, op3);
-  EXPECT_EQ(EVAL_TRUE, op3->Evaluate(&pp_tc1, 1, &mc1));
-  EXPECT_TRUE(_countof(txt3) + _countof(txt2) == mc1.position + 2);
-
-  // We now keep on matching but now we skip 6 characters which means
-  // we skip the string ' over '. And we zero the match context. This is
-  // the primitive that we use to build '??'.
-  PolicyOpcode* op4 = opcode_maker.MakeOpWStringMatch(0, txt4, 6,
-                                                      CASE_SENSITIVE,
-                                                      kPolClearContext);
-  ASSERT_NE(nullptr, op4);
-  EXPECT_EQ(EVAL_TRUE, op4->Evaluate(&pp_tc1, 1, &mc1));
-  EXPECT_EQ(0u, mc1.position);
-
-  // Test that we can properly match the last part of the string
-  PolicyOpcode* op4b = opcode_maker.MakeOpWStringMatch(0, txt4, kSeekToEnd,
-                                                       CASE_SENSITIVE,
-                                                       kPolClearContext);
-  ASSERT_NE(nullptr, op4b);
-  EXPECT_EQ(EVAL_TRUE, op4b->Evaluate(&pp_tc1, 1, &mc1));
-  EXPECT_EQ(0u, mc1.position);
-
-  // Test matching 'jumps over' over the entire string. This is the
-  // primitive we build '*' from.
-  PolicyOpcode* op5 = opcode_maker.MakeOpWStringMatch(0, txt5, kSeekForward,
-                                                      CASE_SENSITIVE, kPolNone);
-  ASSERT_NE(nullptr, op5);
-  EXPECT_EQ(EVAL_TRUE, op5->Evaluate(&pp_tc1, 1, &mc1));
-  EXPECT_EQ(24u, mc1.position);
-
-  // Test that we don't match because it is not at the end of the string
-  PolicyOpcode* op5b = opcode_maker.MakeOpWStringMatch(0, txt5, kSeekToEnd,
-                                                       CASE_SENSITIVE,
-                                                       kPolNone);
-  ASSERT_NE(nullptr, op5b);
-  EXPECT_EQ(EVAL_FALSE, op5b->Evaluate(&pp_tc1, 1, &mc1));
-  EXPECT_EQ(24u, mc1.position);
-
-  // Test that we function if the string does not fit. In this case we
-  // try to match 'the lazy dog' against 'he lazy dog'.
-  PolicyOpcode* op6 = opcode_maker.MakeOpWStringMatch(0, txt4, 2,
-                                                      CASE_SENSITIVE, kPolNone);
-  ASSERT_NE(nullptr, op6);
-  EXPECT_EQ(EVAL_FALSE, op6->Evaluate(&pp_tc1, 1, &mc1));
-
-  // Testing matching against 'g' which should be the last char.
-  MatchContext mc2;
-  PolicyOpcode* op7 = opcode_maker.MakeOpWStringMatch(0, txt6, kSeekForward,
-                                                      CASE_SENSITIVE, kPolNone);
-  ASSERT_NE(nullptr, op7);
-  EXPECT_EQ(EVAL_TRUE, op7->Evaluate(&pp_tc1, 1, &mc2));
-  EXPECT_EQ(37u, mc2.position);
-
-  // Trying to match again should fail since we are in the last char.
-  // This also covers a couple of boundary conditions.
-  EXPECT_EQ(EVAL_FALSE, op7->Evaluate(&pp_tc1, 1, &mc2));
-  EXPECT_EQ(37u, mc2.position);
-}
-
-TEST(PolicyEngineTest, WCharOpcodes2) {
-  SetupNtdllImports();
-
-  const wchar_t* path1 = L"c:\\documents and settings\\Microsoft\\BLAH.txt";
-  const wchar_t txt1[] = L"Settings\\microsoft";
-  ParameterSet pp_tc1 = ParamPickerMake(path1);
-
-  char memory[kOpcodeMemory];
-  OpcodeFactory opcode_maker(memory, sizeof(memory));
-  MatchContext mc1;
-
-  // Testing case-insensitive does not buy us much since it this option
-  // is just passed to the Microsoft API that we use normally, but just for
-  // coverage, here it is:
-  PolicyOpcode* op1s = opcode_maker.MakeOpWStringMatch(0, txt1, kSeekForward,
-                                                      CASE_SENSITIVE, kPolNone);
-  ASSERT_NE(nullptr, op1s);
-  PolicyOpcode* op1i = opcode_maker.MakeOpWStringMatch(0, txt1, kSeekForward,
-                                                       CASE_INSENSITIVE,
-                                                       kPolNone);
-  ASSERT_NE(nullptr, op1i);
-  EXPECT_EQ(EVAL_FALSE, op1s->Evaluate(&pp_tc1, 1, &mc1));
-  EXPECT_EQ(EVAL_TRUE, op1i->Evaluate(&pp_tc1, 1, &mc1));
-  EXPECT_EQ(35u, mc1.position);
-}
-
-TEST(PolicyEngineTest, ActionOpcodes) {
-  char memory[kOpcodeMemory];
-  OpcodeFactory opcode_maker(memory, sizeof(memory));
-  MatchContext mc1;
-  void* dummy = NULL;
-  ParameterSet ppb1 = ParamPickerMake(dummy);
-
-  PolicyOpcode* op1 = opcode_maker.MakeOpAction(ASK_BROKER, kPolNone);
-  ASSERT_NE(nullptr, op1);
-  EXPECT_TRUE(op1->IsAction());
-  EXPECT_EQ(ASK_BROKER, op1->Evaluate(&ppb1, 1, &mc1));
-}
-
-}  // namespace sandbox