Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(990)

Unified Diff: sandbox/win/tests/integration_tests/integration_tests_test.cc

Issue 1851213002: Remove sandbox on Windows. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: fix nacl compile issues Created 4 years, 9 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: sandbox/win/tests/integration_tests/integration_tests_test.cc
diff --git a/sandbox/win/tests/integration_tests/integration_tests_test.cc b/sandbox/win/tests/integration_tests/integration_tests_test.cc
deleted file mode 100644
index 4acadb90a2881f79353d72aaa2c1d56176f1bff7..0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
--- a/sandbox/win/tests/integration_tests/integration_tests_test.cc
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,308 +0,0 @@
-// Copyright (c) 2006-2008 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
-// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
-// found in the LICENSE file.
-
-// Some tests for the framework itself.
-
-#include <stddef.h>
-
-#include "sandbox/win/src/sandbox.h"
-#include "sandbox/win/src/sandbox_factory.h"
-#include "sandbox/win/src/target_services.h"
-#include "sandbox/win/tests/common/controller.h"
-#include "testing/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h"
-
-namespace sandbox {
-
-// Returns the current process state.
-SBOX_TESTS_COMMAND int IntegrationTestsTest_state(int argc, wchar_t **argv) {
- if (!SandboxFactory::GetTargetServices()->GetState()->InitCalled())
- return BEFORE_INIT;
-
- if (!SandboxFactory::GetTargetServices()->GetState()->RevertedToSelf())
- return BEFORE_REVERT;
-
- return AFTER_REVERT;
-}
-
-// Returns the current process state, keeping track of it.
-SBOX_TESTS_COMMAND int IntegrationTestsTest_state2(int argc, wchar_t **argv) {
- static SboxTestsState state = MIN_STATE;
- if (!SandboxFactory::GetTargetServices()->GetState()->InitCalled()) {
- if (MIN_STATE == state)
- state = BEFORE_INIT;
- return state;
- }
-
- if (!SandboxFactory::GetTargetServices()->GetState()->RevertedToSelf()) {
- if (BEFORE_INIT == state)
- state = BEFORE_REVERT;
- return state;
- }
-
- if (BEFORE_REVERT == state)
- state = AFTER_REVERT;
- return state;
-}
-
-// Blocks the process for argv[0] milliseconds simulating stuck child.
-SBOX_TESTS_COMMAND int IntegrationTestsTest_stuck(int argc, wchar_t **argv) {
- int timeout = 500;
- if (argc > 0) {
- timeout = _wtoi(argv[0]);
- }
-
- ::Sleep(timeout);
- return 1;
-}
-
-// Returns the number of arguments
-SBOX_TESTS_COMMAND int IntegrationTestsTest_args(int argc, wchar_t **argv) {
- for (int i = 0; i < argc; i++) {
- wchar_t argument[20];
- size_t argument_bytes = wcslen(argv[i]) * sizeof(wchar_t);
- memcpy(argument, argv[i], __min(sizeof(argument), argument_bytes));
- }
-
- return argc;
-}
-
-// Creates a job and tries to run a process inside it. The function can be
-// called with up to two parameters. The first one if set to "none" means that
-// the child process should be run with the JOB_NONE JobLevel else it is run
-// with JOB_LOCKDOWN level. The second if present specifies that the
-// JOB_OBJECT_LIMIT_BREAKAWAY_OK flag should be set on the job object created
-// in this function. The return value is either SBOX_TEST_SUCCEEDED if the test
-// has passed or a value between 0 and 4 indicating which part of the test has
-// failed.
-SBOX_TESTS_COMMAND int IntegrationTestsTest_job(int argc, wchar_t **argv) {
- HANDLE job = ::CreateJobObject(NULL, NULL);
- if (!job)
- return 0;
-
- JOBOBJECT_EXTENDED_LIMIT_INFORMATION job_limits;
- if (!::QueryInformationJobObject(job, JobObjectExtendedLimitInformation,
- &job_limits, sizeof(job_limits), NULL)) {
- return 1;
- }
- // We cheat here and assume no 2-nd parameter means no breakaway flag and any
- // value for the second param means with breakaway flag.
- if (argc > 1) {
- job_limits.BasicLimitInformation.LimitFlags |=
- JOB_OBJECT_LIMIT_BREAKAWAY_OK;
- } else {
- job_limits.BasicLimitInformation.LimitFlags &=
- ~JOB_OBJECT_LIMIT_BREAKAWAY_OK;
- }
- if (!::SetInformationJobObject(job, JobObjectExtendedLimitInformation,
- &job_limits, sizeof(job_limits))) {
- return 2;
- }
- if (!::AssignProcessToJobObject(job, ::GetCurrentProcess()))
- return 3;
-
- JobLevel job_level = JOB_LOCKDOWN;
- if (argc > 0 && wcscmp(argv[0], L"none") == 0)
- job_level = JOB_NONE;
-
- TestRunner runner(job_level, USER_RESTRICTED_SAME_ACCESS, USER_LOCKDOWN);
- runner.SetTimeout(2000);
-
- if (1 != runner.RunTest(L"IntegrationTestsTest_args 1"))
- return 4;
-
- // Terminate the job now.
- ::TerminateJobObject(job, SBOX_TEST_SUCCEEDED);
- // We should not make it to here but it doesn't mean our test failed.
- return SBOX_TEST_SUCCEEDED;
-}
-
-TEST(IntegrationTestsTest, CallsBeforeInit) {
- TestRunner runner;
- runner.SetTimeout(2000);
- runner.SetTestState(BEFORE_INIT);
- ASSERT_EQ(BEFORE_INIT, runner.RunTest(L"IntegrationTestsTest_state"));
-}
-
-TEST(IntegrationTestsTest, CallsBeforeRevert) {
- TestRunner runner;
- runner.SetTimeout(2000);
- runner.SetTestState(BEFORE_REVERT);
- ASSERT_EQ(BEFORE_REVERT, runner.RunTest(L"IntegrationTestsTest_state"));
-}
-
-TEST(IntegrationTestsTest, CallsAfterRevert) {
- TestRunner runner;
- runner.SetTimeout(2000);
- runner.SetTestState(AFTER_REVERT);
- ASSERT_EQ(AFTER_REVERT, runner.RunTest(L"IntegrationTestsTest_state"));
-}
-
-TEST(IntegrationTestsTest, CallsEveryState) {
- TestRunner runner;
- runner.SetTimeout(2000);
- runner.SetTestState(EVERY_STATE);
- ASSERT_EQ(AFTER_REVERT, runner.RunTest(L"IntegrationTestsTest_state2"));
-}
-
-TEST(IntegrationTestsTest, ForwardsArguments) {
- TestRunner runner;
- runner.SetTimeout(2000);
- runner.SetTestState(BEFORE_INIT);
- ASSERT_EQ(1, runner.RunTest(L"IntegrationTestsTest_args first"));
- ASSERT_EQ(4, runner.RunTest(L"IntegrationTestsTest_args first second third "
- L"fourth"));
-}
-
-TEST(IntegrationTestsTest, WaitForStuckChild) {
- TestRunner runner;
- runner.SetTimeout(2000);
- runner.SetAsynchronous(true);
- runner.SetKillOnDestruction(false);
- ASSERT_EQ(SBOX_TEST_SUCCEEDED,
- runner.RunTest(L"IntegrationTestsTest_stuck 100"));
- ASSERT_EQ(SBOX_ALL_OK, runner.broker()->WaitForAllTargets());
-}
-
-TEST(IntegrationTestsTest, NoWaitForStuckChildNoJob) {
- TestRunner runner(JOB_NONE, USER_RESTRICTED_SAME_ACCESS, USER_LOCKDOWN);
- runner.SetTimeout(2000);
- runner.SetAsynchronous(true);
- runner.SetKillOnDestruction(false);
- ASSERT_EQ(SBOX_TEST_SUCCEEDED,
- runner.RunTest(L"IntegrationTestsTest_stuck 2000"));
- ASSERT_EQ(SBOX_ALL_OK, runner.broker()->WaitForAllTargets());
- // In this case the processes are not tracked by the broker and should be
- // still active.
- DWORD exit_code;
- ASSERT_TRUE(::GetExitCodeProcess(runner.process(), &exit_code));
- ASSERT_EQ(STILL_ACTIVE, exit_code);
- // Terminate the test process now.
- ::TerminateProcess(runner.process(), 0);
-}
-
-TEST(IntegrationTestsTest, TwoStuckChildrenSecondOneHasNoJob) {
- TestRunner runner;
- runner.SetTimeout(2000);
- runner.SetAsynchronous(true);
- runner.SetKillOnDestruction(false);
- TestRunner runner2(JOB_NONE, USER_RESTRICTED_SAME_ACCESS, USER_LOCKDOWN);
- runner2.SetTimeout(2000);
- runner2.SetAsynchronous(true);
- runner2.SetKillOnDestruction(false);
- ASSERT_EQ(SBOX_TEST_SUCCEEDED,
- runner.RunTest(L"IntegrationTestsTest_stuck 100"));
- ASSERT_EQ(SBOX_TEST_SUCCEEDED,
- runner2.RunTest(L"IntegrationTestsTest_stuck 2000"));
- // Actually both runners share the same singleton broker.
- ASSERT_EQ(SBOX_ALL_OK, runner.broker()->WaitForAllTargets());
- // In this case the processes are not tracked by the broker and should be
- // still active.
- DWORD exit_code;
- // Checking the exit code for |runner| is flaky on the slow bots but at
- // least we know that the wait above has succeeded if we are here.
- ASSERT_TRUE(::GetExitCodeProcess(runner2.process(), &exit_code));
- ASSERT_EQ(STILL_ACTIVE, exit_code);
- // Terminate the test process now.
- ::TerminateProcess(runner2.process(), 0);
-}
-
-TEST(IntegrationTestsTest, TwoStuckChildrenFirstOneHasNoJob) {
- TestRunner runner;
- runner.SetTimeout(2000);
- runner.SetAsynchronous(true);
- runner.SetKillOnDestruction(false);
- TestRunner runner2(JOB_NONE, USER_RESTRICTED_SAME_ACCESS, USER_LOCKDOWN);
- runner2.SetTimeout(2000);
- runner2.SetAsynchronous(true);
- runner2.SetKillOnDestruction(false);
- ASSERT_EQ(SBOX_TEST_SUCCEEDED,
- runner2.RunTest(L"IntegrationTestsTest_stuck 2000"));
- ASSERT_EQ(SBOX_TEST_SUCCEEDED,
- runner.RunTest(L"IntegrationTestsTest_stuck 100"));
- // Actually both runners share the same singleton broker.
- ASSERT_EQ(SBOX_ALL_OK, runner.broker()->WaitForAllTargets());
- // In this case the processes are not tracked by the broker and should be
- // still active.
- DWORD exit_code;
- // Checking the exit code for |runner| is flaky on the slow bots but at
- // least we know that the wait above has succeeded if we are here.
- ASSERT_TRUE(::GetExitCodeProcess(runner2.process(), &exit_code));
- ASSERT_EQ(STILL_ACTIVE, exit_code);
- // Terminate the test process now.
- ::TerminateProcess(runner2.process(), 0);
-}
-
-TEST(IntegrationTestsTest, MultipleStuckChildrenSequential) {
- TestRunner runner;
- runner.SetTimeout(2000);
- runner.SetAsynchronous(true);
- runner.SetKillOnDestruction(false);
- TestRunner runner2(JOB_NONE, USER_RESTRICTED_SAME_ACCESS, USER_LOCKDOWN);
- runner2.SetTimeout(2000);
- runner2.SetAsynchronous(true);
- runner2.SetKillOnDestruction(false);
-
- ASSERT_EQ(SBOX_TEST_SUCCEEDED,
- runner.RunTest(L"IntegrationTestsTest_stuck 100"));
- // Actually both runners share the same singleton broker.
- ASSERT_EQ(SBOX_ALL_OK, runner.broker()->WaitForAllTargets());
- ASSERT_EQ(SBOX_TEST_SUCCEEDED,
- runner2.RunTest(L"IntegrationTestsTest_stuck 2000"));
- // Actually both runners share the same singleton broker.
- ASSERT_EQ(SBOX_ALL_OK, runner.broker()->WaitForAllTargets());
-
- DWORD exit_code;
- // Checking the exit code for |runner| is flaky on the slow bots but at
- // least we know that the wait above has succeeded if we are here.
- ASSERT_TRUE(::GetExitCodeProcess(runner2.process(), &exit_code));
- ASSERT_EQ(STILL_ACTIVE, exit_code);
- // Terminate the test process now.
- ::TerminateProcess(runner2.process(), 0);
-
- ASSERT_EQ(SBOX_TEST_SUCCEEDED,
- runner.RunTest(L"IntegrationTestsTest_stuck 100"));
- // Actually both runners share the same singleton broker.
- ASSERT_EQ(SBOX_ALL_OK, runner.broker()->WaitForAllTargets());
-}
-
-// Running from inside job that allows us to escape from it should be ok.
-TEST(IntegrationTestsTest, RunChildFromInsideJob) {
- TestRunner runner;
- runner.SetUnsandboxed(true);
- runner.SetTimeout(2000);
- ASSERT_EQ(SBOX_TEST_SUCCEEDED,
- runner.RunTest(L"IntegrationTestsTest_job with_job escape_flag"));
-}
-
-// Running from inside job that doesn't allow us to escape from it should fail
-// on any windows prior to 8.
-TEST(IntegrationTestsTest, RunChildFromInsideJobNoEscape) {
- int expect_result = 4; // Means the runner has failed to execute the child.
- // Check if we are on Win8 or newer and expect a success as newer windows
- // versions support nested jobs.
- OSVERSIONINFOEX version_info = { sizeof version_info };
- ::GetVersionEx(reinterpret_cast<OSVERSIONINFO*>(&version_info));
- if (version_info.dwMajorVersion > 6 ||
- (version_info.dwMajorVersion == 6 && version_info.dwMinorVersion >= 2)) {
- expect_result = SBOX_TEST_SUCCEEDED;
- }
-
- TestRunner runner;
- runner.SetUnsandboxed(true);
- runner.SetTimeout(2000);
- ASSERT_EQ(expect_result,
- runner.RunTest(L"IntegrationTestsTest_job with_job"));
-}
-
-// Running without a job object should be ok regardless of the fact that we are
-// running inside an outter job.
-TEST(IntegrationTestsTest, RunJoblessChildFromInsideJob) {
- TestRunner runner;
- runner.SetUnsandboxed(true);
- runner.SetTimeout(2000);
- ASSERT_EQ(SBOX_TEST_SUCCEEDED,
- runner.RunTest(L"IntegrationTestsTest_job none"));
-}
-
-} // namespace sandbox

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698