Index: src/compiler/pipeline.cc |
diff --git a/src/compiler/pipeline.cc b/src/compiler/pipeline.cc |
index d711abefb8338ead3c661268696013612f3a1253..b84a5d0af70f876e6bb5bde15215da20b1456527 100644 |
--- a/src/compiler/pipeline.cc |
+++ b/src/compiler/pipeline.cc |
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ |
#include "src/compiler/common-operator-reducer.h" |
#include "src/compiler/control-flow-optimizer.h" |
#include "src/compiler/dead-code-elimination.h" |
+#include "src/compiler/effect-control-linearizer.h" |
#include "src/compiler/escape-analysis-reducer.h" |
#include "src/compiler/escape-analysis.h" |
#include "src/compiler/frame-elider.h" |
@@ -225,6 +226,7 @@ class PipelineData { |
DCHECK(!schedule_); |
schedule_ = schedule; |
} |
+ void reset_schedule() { schedule_ = nullptr; } |
Zone* instruction_zone() const { return instruction_zone_; } |
InstructionSequence* sequence() const { return sequence_; } |
@@ -799,6 +801,15 @@ struct ControlFlowOptimizationPhase { |
} |
}; |
+struct FixLowLevelEffectsPhase { |
Benedikt Meurer
2016/04/18 04:34:18
Can we have a single ControlEffectLinearizationPha
Jarin
2016/04/18 07:53:33
Done.
|
+ static const char* phase_name() { return "low-level effect wiring"; } |
+ |
+ void Run(PipelineData* data, Zone* temp_zone) { |
+ EffectControlLinearizer introducer(data->jsgraph(), data->schedule(), |
+ temp_zone); |
+ introducer.Run(); |
+ } |
+}; |
struct ChangeLoweringPhase { |
static const char* phase_name() { return "change lowering"; } |
@@ -823,6 +834,26 @@ struct ChangeLoweringPhase { |
} |
}; |
+struct ComputeEffectSchedulePhase { |
+ static const char* phase_name() { return "effect scheduling"; } |
+ |
+ void Run(PipelineData* data, Zone* temp_zone) { |
+ Schedule* schedule = Scheduler::ComputeSchedule(temp_zone, data->graph(), |
+ Scheduler::kNoFlags); |
+ if (FLAG_turbo_verify) ScheduleVerifier::Run(schedule); |
+ data->set_schedule(schedule); |
+ } |
+}; |
+ |
+struct EffectScheduleTrimmingPhase { |
Benedikt Meurer
2016/04/18 04:34:18
Can you put a TODO on this guy, that we only need
Jarin
2016/04/18 07:53:33
Done.
|
+ static const char* phase_name() { return "effect schedule graph trimming"; } |
+ void Run(PipelineData* data, Zone* temp_zone) { |
+ GraphTrimmer trimmer(temp_zone, data->graph()); |
+ NodeVector roots(temp_zone); |
+ data->jsgraph()->GetCachedNodes(&roots); |
+ trimmer.TrimGraph(roots.begin(), roots.end()); |
+ } |
+}; |
struct EarlyGraphTrimmingPhase { |
static const char* phase_name() { return "early graph trimming"; } |
@@ -1251,6 +1282,31 @@ Handle<Code> Pipeline::GenerateCode() { |
Run<SimplifiedLoweringPhase>(); |
RunPrintAndVerify("Lowered simplified"); |
+ if (!info()->shared_info()->asm_function()) { |
Benedikt Meurer
2016/04/18 04:34:18
How bad is this actually for asm.js functions?
|
+ // TODO(jarin) Run value numbering for the representation changes. |
+ |
+ // The scheduler requires the graphs to be trimmed, so trim now. |
+ Run<EffectScheduleTrimmingPhase>(); |
+ |
+ // Schedule the graph without node splitting so that we can |
+ // fix the effect and control flow for nodes with low-level side |
+ // effects (such as changing representation to tagged or |
+ // 'floating' allocation regions.) |
+ Run<ComputeEffectSchedulePhase>(); |
+ |
+ // Post-pass for wiring the control/effects |
+ // - connect allocating representation changes into the control&effect |
+ // chains and lower them, |
+ // - get rid of the region markers, |
+ // - introduce effect phis and rewire effects to get SSA again. |
+ Run<FixLowLevelEffectsPhase>(); |
+ |
+ // Get rid of the schedule. |
+ // TODO(jarin) We should produce the schedule in a temporary zone. |
+ data.reset_schedule(); |
+ RunPrintAndVerify("Fixed state flow"); |
+ } |
+ |
Run<BranchEliminationPhase>(); |
RunPrintAndVerify("Branch conditions eliminated"); |