Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(65)

Side by Side Diff: test/mjsunit/es6/classes-subclass-builtins.js

Issue 1846303002: Further ES2015 RegExp spec compliance fixes (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8.git@master
Patch Set: Fix cctest Created 4 years, 8 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View unified diff | Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « test/cctest/test-regexp.cc ('k') | test/mjsunit/es6/regexp-constructor.js » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Toggle Intra-line Diffs ('i') | Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
OLDNEW
1 // Copyright 2015 the V8 project authors. All rights reserved. 1 // Copyright 2015 the V8 project authors. All rights reserved.
2 // Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be 2 // Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
3 // found in the LICENSE file. 3 // found in the LICENSE file.
4 4
5 // Flags: --allow-natives-syntax --harmony-regexp-subclass 5 // Flags: --allow-natives-syntax --harmony-regexp-subclass
6 // Flags: --expose-gc 6 // Flags: --expose-gc
7 7
8 "use strict"; 8 "use strict";
9 9
10 10
(...skipping 901 matching lines...) Expand 10 before | Expand all | Expand 10 after
912 912
913 var pattern = {toString() { 913 var pattern = {toString() {
914 log.push("tostring"); 914 log.push("tostring");
915 f.prototype = p3; return "biep" }}; 915 f.prototype = p3; return "biep" }};
916 916
917 Object.defineProperty(pattern, Symbol.match, { 917 Object.defineProperty(pattern, Symbol.match, {
918 get() { log.push("match"); f.prototype = p2; return false; }}); 918 get() { log.push("match"); f.prototype = p2; return false; }});
919 919
920 var o = Reflect.construct(RegExp, [pattern], f); 920 var o = Reflect.construct(RegExp, [pattern], f);
921 assertEquals(["match", "tostring"], log); 921 assertEquals(["match", "tostring"], log);
922 assertEquals(/biep/, o); 922 // TODO(littledan): Is the RegExp constructor correct to create
923 // the internal slots and do these type checks this way?
924 assertEquals("biep", %_RegExpSource(o));
925 assertThrows(() => Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(RegExp.prototype,
926 'source').get(o),
927 TypeError);
928 assertEquals("/undefined/undefined", RegExp.prototype.toString.call(o));
923 assertTrue(o.__proto__ === p2); 929 assertTrue(o.__proto__ === p2);
924 assertTrue(f.prototype === p3); 930 assertTrue(f.prototype === p3);
925 })(); 931 })();
OLDNEW
« no previous file with comments | « test/cctest/test-regexp.cc ('k') | test/mjsunit/es6/regexp-constructor.js » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698