Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(177)

Unified Diff: components/certificate_transparency/single_tree_tracker.cc

Issue 1845113003: Certificate Transparency: Start tracking logs' state (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: Ready for review Created 4 years, 8 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: components/certificate_transparency/single_tree_tracker.cc
diff --git a/components/certificate_transparency/single_tree_tracker.cc b/components/certificate_transparency/single_tree_tracker.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..14c9ed0060c4ca647965909763a417913c8fb3e9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/components/certificate_transparency/single_tree_tracker.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+// Copyright 2016 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "components/certificate_transparency/single_tree_tracker.h"
+
+#include <utility>
+
+#include "base/strings/string_number_conversions.h"
+#include "net/cert/ct_log_verifier.h"
+#include "net/cert/signed_certificate_timestamp.h"
+#include "net/cert/x509_certificate.h"
+
+using net::ct::SignedTreeHead;
+
+namespace {
+
+bool STHIsTooOld(const SignedTreeHead& sth, const base::Time& sct_timestamp) {
Ryan Sleevi 2016/04/14 16:56:15 Doesn't seem like this needs to be a utility funct
Eran Messeri 2016/04/18 22:02:12 Done, removed.
+ return sth.timestamp < (sct_timestamp + base::TimeDelta::FromHours(24));
+}
+
+} // namespace
+
+namespace certificate_transparency {
+
+SingleTreeTracker::SingleTreeTracker(
+ scoped_refptr<const net::CTLogVerifier>& ct_log)
+ : ct_log_(ct_log) {}
Ryan Sleevi 2016/04/14 16:56:15 When you update to be by-value, move
Eran Messeri 2016/04/18 22:02:12 Done.
+
+SingleTreeTracker::~SingleTreeTracker() {}
+
+void SingleTreeTracker::OnSCTVerified(
+ net::X509Certificate* cert,
+ const net::ct::SignedCertificateTimestamp* sct) {
+ CheckLogId(sct->log_id);
+
+ if (entries_status_.find(sct->timestamp) != entries_status_.end())
+ return;
+
+ if (verified_sth_.timestamp.is_null() ||
+ STHIsTooOld(verified_sth_, sct->timestamp)) {
+ // TODO(eranm): UMA - how often SCTs have to wait for a newer STH for
+ // inclusion check.
+ entries_status_.insert(
+ std::make_pair(sct->timestamp, SCT_PENDING_NEWER_STH));
+ return;
+ }
+
+ // TODO(eranm): Check inclusion here.
+ // TODO(eranm): UMA - how often inclusion can be checked immediately.
+ entries_status_.insert(
+ std::make_pair(sct->timestamp, SCT_PENDING_INCLUSION_CHECK));
+}
+
+void SingleTreeTracker::NewSTHObserved(const SignedTreeHead& sth) {
+ CheckLogId(sth.log_id);
+
+ if (!ct_log_->VerifySignedTreeHead(sth)) {
+ // This is an error - STHs are validated prior to being pushed via the
+ // component updater.
Ryan Sleevi 2016/04/14 16:56:15 What sort of error is this? Developer error? In wh
Eran Messeri 2016/04/18 22:02:12 Operational error? This would only happen if we (G
+ LOG(WARNING) << "STH is for " << ct_log_->url()
+ << " could not be verified.";
+ // TODO(eranm): UMA
+ return;
+ }
+
+ bool sths_for_same_tree = (verified_sth_.tree_size == sth.tree_size);
+ bool received_sth_is_for_larger_tree =
+ (verified_sth_.tree_size > sth.tree_size);
+ bool received_sth_is_newer = (sth.timestamp > verified_sth_.timestamp);
+
+ if (verified_sth_.timestamp.is_null() || received_sth_is_for_larger_tree ||
+ (sths_for_same_tree && received_sth_is_newer)) {
+ verified_sth_ = sth;
+ }
+
+ // Find out which SCTs can now be checked for inclusion.
+ for (auto it = entries_status_.begin(); it != entries_status_.end(); ++it) {
+ const base::Time& timestamp(it->first);
Ryan Sleevi 2016/04/14 16:56:15 Seems unnecessary
Eran Messeri 2016/04/18 22:02:12 Done - removed.
+ if (timestamp < verified_sth_.timestamp) {
+ it->second = SCT_PENDING_INCLUSION_CHECK;
+ // TODO(eranm): Check inclusion here.
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+SingleTreeTracker::SCTInclusionStatus
+SingleTreeTracker::GetLogEntryInclusionStatus(
+ net::X509Certificate* cert,
+ const net::ct::SignedCertificateTimestamp* sct) {
+ auto it = entries_status_.find(sct->timestamp);
+ if (it == entries_status_.end())
+ return SCT_NOT_OBSERVED;
+
+ return it->second;
+}
+
+void SingleTreeTracker::CheckLogId(const std::string& log_id) {
+ if (log_id != ct_log_->key_id()) {
Ryan Sleevi 2016/04/14 16:56:16 Explain why or when this happens. As far as I can
Eran Messeri 2016/04/18 22:02:12 You're right - it's a developer error, so changed
+ LOG(ERROR) << "Got called for a different log: "
+ << base::HexEncode(log_id.data(), log_id.size())
+ << " this log: " << base::HexEncode(ct_log_->key_id().data(),
+ ct_log_->key_id().size());
+ NOTREACHED();
+ return;
+ }
+}
+
+} // namespace certificate_transparency

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698