Add template for chrome.hid documentation.

Add template for chrome.hid documentation.

Also update channel to stable.

BUG=348085
Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=266393

[Ken Rockot(use gerrit already), 2014-02-28 18:57:38]

+mkearney@: I can't find any evidence that this API ever received a proper
documentation review. If it has, please ignore

[not at google - send to devlin, 2014-02-28 19:10:21]

Hid is going to stable as part of this ?

[Ken Rockot(use gerrit already), 2014-02-28 19:18:38]

On 2014/02/28 19:10:21, kalman wrote:
> Hid is going to stable as part of this ?

Yes. We're just about ready to launch, contingent upon a final security review.

[not at google - send to devlin, 2014-02-28 21:23:38]

how long ago was it approved?

[Ken Rockot(use gerrit already), 2014-02-28 22:44:07]

On 2014/02/28 21:23:38, kalman wrote:
> how long ago was it approved?

Don't know the complete history of this effort, but there's a launch bug at
http://crbug.com/305300. It was targeted for M34 but some relevant changes
missed the branch point. In any case it's ready for M35.

[not at google - send to devlin, 2014-02-28 22:49:50]

On 2014/02/28 22:44:07, Ken Rockot wrote:
> On 2014/02/28 21:23:38, kalman wrote:
> > how long ago was it approved?
> 
> Don't know the complete history of this effort, but there's a launch bug at
> http://crbug.com/305300. It was targeted for M34 but some relevant changes
> missed the branch point. In any case it's ready for M35.

The launch bug still has AppExt-No.

[Ken Rockot(use gerrit already), 2014-04-25 19:39:53]

On 2014/02/28 22:49:50, kalman wrote:
> On 2014/02/28 22:44:07, Ken Rockot wrote:
> > On 2014/02/28 21:23:38, kalman wrote:
> > > how long ago was it approved?
> > 
> > Don't know the complete history of this effort, but there's a launch bug at
> > http://crbug.com/305300. It was targeted for M34 but some relevant changes
> > missed the branch point. In any case it's ready for M35.
> 
> The launch bug still has AppExt-No.

I think this is ready now!

[not at google - send to devlin, 2014-04-25 19:46:50]

can we just do the documentation part for now?

[Ken Rockot(use gerrit already), 2014-04-25 19:49:14]

On 2014/04/25 19:46:50, kalman wrote:
> can we just do the documentation part for now?

Sure, done. What unblocks the feature update?

[not at google - send to devlin, 2014-04-25 19:49:36]

lgtm

ask mike

[Ken Rockot(use gerrit already), 2014-04-25 19:50:10]

On 2014/04/25 19:49:36, kalman wrote:
> lgtm
> 
> ask mike

API has LGTM from mike

[Ken Rockot(use gerrit already), 2014-04-25 19:51:45]

The CQ bit was checked by rockot@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-04-25 22:08:43]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/rockot@chromium.org/184483005/50001

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-04-25 23:19:47]

The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-04-25 23:19:48]

Try jobs failed on following builders:
  tryserver.chromium on linux_chromium_clang_dbg
  tryserver.chromium on linux_chromium_rel

[Ken Rockot(use gerrit already), 2014-04-25 23:29:19]

The CQ bit was checked by rockot@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-04-25 23:31:06]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/rockot@chromium.org/184483005/50001

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-04-25 23:45:43]

The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-04-25 23:45:44]

Try jobs failed on following builders:
  tryserver.chromium on win_chromium_rel

[Ken Rockot(use gerrit already), 2014-04-26 20:47:41]

The CQ bit was checked by rockot@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-04-26 20:48:11]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/rockot@chromium.org/184483005/50001

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-04-26 22:43:11]

Change committed as 266393