Update //third_party/protobuf to version 3.

third_party/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/preserve_unknown_enum_test.cc

Index: third_party/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/preserve_unknown_enum_test.cc
diff --git a/third_party/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/preserve_unknown_enum_test.cc b/third_party/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/preserve_unknown_enum_test.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1673e8afaed02a5b6d0c3782d0b0fb6d3342ee50
--- /dev/null
+++ b/third_party/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/preserve_unknown_enum_test.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,289 @@
+// Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format
+// Copyright 2008 Google Inc.  All rights reserved.
+// https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/
+//
+// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+// met:
+//
+//     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+//     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
+// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
+// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
+// distribution.
+//     * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
+// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+// this software without specific prior written permission.
+//
+// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
+// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
+// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
+// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
+// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
+// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
+// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
+// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
+// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+
+#include <google/protobuf/unittest.pb.h>
+#include <google/protobuf/unittest_preserve_unknown_enum.pb.h>
+#include <google/protobuf/unittest_preserve_unknown_enum2.pb.h>
+#include <google/protobuf/dynamic_message.h>
+#include <google/protobuf/descriptor.h>
+#include <gtest/gtest.h>
+
+namespace google {
+namespace protobuf {
+namespace {
+
+void FillMessage(
+    proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessagePlusExtra* message) {
+  message->set_e(
+      proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA);
+  message->add_repeated_e(
+      proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA);
+  message->add_repeated_packed_e(
+      proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA);
+  message->add_repeated_packed_unexpected_e(
+      proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA);
+  message->set_oneof_e_1(
+      proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA);
+}
+
+void CheckMessage(
+    const proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessagePlusExtra& message) {
+  EXPECT_EQ(proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA,
+            message.e());
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, message.repeated_e_size());
+  EXPECT_EQ(proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA,
+            message.repeated_e(0));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, message.repeated_packed_e_size());
+  EXPECT_EQ(proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA,
+            message.repeated_packed_e(0));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, message.repeated_packed_unexpected_e_size());
+  EXPECT_EQ(proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA,
+            message.repeated_packed_unexpected_e(0));
+  EXPECT_EQ(proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA,
+            message.oneof_e_1());
+}
+
+void CheckMessage(
+    const proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessage& message) {
+  EXPECT_EQ(static_cast<int>(
+              proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA),
+            static_cast<int>(message.e()));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, message.repeated_e_size());
+  EXPECT_EQ(static_cast<int>(
+              proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA),
+            static_cast<int>(message.repeated_e(0)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, message.repeated_packed_e_size());
+  EXPECT_EQ(static_cast<int>(
+              proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA),
+            static_cast<int>(message.repeated_packed_e(0)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, message.repeated_packed_unexpected_e_size());
+  EXPECT_EQ(static_cast<int>(
+              proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA),
+            static_cast<int>(message.repeated_packed_unexpected_e(0)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(static_cast<int>(
+              proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA),
+            static_cast<int>(message.oneof_e_1()));
+}
+
+}  // anonymous namespace
+
+// Test that parsing preserves an unknown value in the enum field and does not
+// punt it to the UnknownFieldSet.
+TEST(PreserveUnknownEnumTest, PreserveParseAndSerialize) {
+  proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessagePlusExtra orig_message;
+  FillMessage(&orig_message);
+  string serialized;
+  orig_message.SerializeToString(&serialized);
+
+  proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessage message;
+  EXPECT_EQ(true, message.ParseFromString(serialized));
+  CheckMessage(message);
+
+  serialized.clear();
+  message.SerializeToString(&serialized);
+  EXPECT_EQ(true, orig_message.ParseFromString(serialized));
+  CheckMessage(orig_message);
+}
+
+// Test that reflection based implementation also keeps unknown enum values and
+// doesn't put them into UnknownFieldSet.
+TEST(PreserveUnknownEnumTest, PreserveParseAndSerializeDynamicMessage) {
+  proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessagePlusExtra orig_message;
+  FillMessage(&orig_message);
+  string serialized = orig_message.SerializeAsString();
+
+  google::protobuf::DynamicMessageFactory factory;
+  google::protobuf::scoped_ptr<google::protobuf::Message> message(factory.GetPrototype(
+      proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessage::descriptor())->New());
+  EXPECT_EQ(true, message->ParseFromString(serialized));
+  message->DiscardUnknownFields();
+
+  serialized = message->SerializeAsString();
+  EXPECT_EQ(true, orig_message.ParseFromString(serialized));
+  CheckMessage(orig_message);
+}
+
+// Test that for proto2 messages, unknown values are in unknown fields.
+TEST(PreserveUnknownEnumTest, Proto2HidesUnknownValues) {
+  proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessagePlusExtra orig_message;
+  FillMessage(&orig_message);
+
+  string serialized;
+  orig_message.SerializeToString(&serialized);
+
+  proto2_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessage message;
+  EXPECT_EQ(true, message.ParseFromString(serialized));
+  // The intermediate message has everything in its "unknown fields".
+  proto2_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessage message2 = message;
+  message2.DiscardUnknownFields();
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, message2.ByteSize());
+
+  // But when we pass it to the correct structure, all values are there.
+  serialized.clear();
+  message.SerializeToString(&serialized);
+  EXPECT_EQ(true, orig_message.ParseFromString(serialized));
+  CheckMessage(orig_message);
+}
+
+// Same as before, for a dynamic message.
+TEST(PreserveUnknownEnumTest, DynamicProto2HidesUnknownValues) {
+  proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessagePlusExtra orig_message;
+  FillMessage(&orig_message);
+
+  string serialized;
+  orig_message.SerializeToString(&serialized);
+
+  google::protobuf::DynamicMessageFactory factory;
+  google::protobuf::scoped_ptr<google::protobuf::Message> message(factory.GetPrototype(
+      proto2_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessage::descriptor())->New());
+  EXPECT_EQ(true, message->ParseFromString(serialized));
+  // The intermediate message has everything in its "unknown fields".
+  proto2_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessage message2;
+  message2.CopyFrom(*message);
+  message2.DiscardUnknownFields();
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, message2.ByteSize());
+
+  // But when we pass it to the correct structure, all values are there.
+  serialized.clear();
+  message->SerializeToString(&serialized);
+  EXPECT_EQ(true, orig_message.ParseFromString(serialized));
+  CheckMessage(orig_message);
+}
+
+// Test that reflection provides EnumValueDescriptors for unknown values.
+TEST(PreserveUnknownEnumTest, DynamicEnumValueDescriptors) {
+  proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessagePlusExtra orig_message;
+  FillMessage(&orig_message);
+  string serialized;
+  orig_message.SerializeToString(&serialized);
+
+  proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessage message;
+  EXPECT_EQ(true, message.ParseFromString(serialized));
+  CheckMessage(message);
+
+  const google::protobuf::Reflection* r = message.GetReflection();
+  const google::protobuf::Descriptor* d = message.GetDescriptor();
+  const google::protobuf::FieldDescriptor* field = d->FindFieldByName("e");
+
+  // This should dynamically create an EnumValueDescriptor.
+  const google::protobuf::EnumValueDescriptor* enum_value = r->GetEnum(message, field);
+  EXPECT_EQ(enum_value->number(),
+            static_cast<int>(proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA));
+
+  // Fetching value for a second time should return the same pointer.
+  const google::protobuf::EnumValueDescriptor* enum_value_second =
+      r->GetEnum(message, field);
+  EXPECT_EQ(enum_value, enum_value_second);
+
+  // Check the repeated case too.
+  const google::protobuf::FieldDescriptor* repeated_field =
+      d->FindFieldByName("repeated_e");
+  enum_value = r->GetRepeatedEnum(message, repeated_field, 0);
+  EXPECT_EQ(enum_value->number(),
+            static_cast<int>(proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA));
+  // Should reuse the same EnumValueDescriptor, even for a different field.
+  EXPECT_EQ(enum_value, enum_value_second);
+
+  // We should be able to use the returned value descriptor to set a value on
+  // another message.
+  google::protobuf::Message* m = message.New();
+  r->SetEnum(m, field, enum_value);
+  EXPECT_EQ(enum_value, r->GetEnum(*m, field));
+  delete m;
+}
+
+// Test that the new integer-based enum reflection API works.
+TEST(PreserveUnknownEnumTest, IntegerEnumReflectionAPI) {
+  proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessage message;
+  const google::protobuf::Reflection* r = message.GetReflection();
+  const google::protobuf::Descriptor* d = message.GetDescriptor();
+
+  const google::protobuf::FieldDescriptor* singular_field = d->FindFieldByName("e");
+  const google::protobuf::FieldDescriptor* repeated_field =
+      d->FindFieldByName("repeated_e");
+
+  r->SetEnumValue(&message, singular_field, 42);
+  EXPECT_EQ(42, r->GetEnumValue(message, singular_field));
+  r->AddEnumValue(&message, repeated_field, 42);
+  r->AddEnumValue(&message, repeated_field, 42);
+  EXPECT_EQ(42, r->GetRepeatedEnumValue(message, repeated_field, 0));
+  r->SetRepeatedEnumValue(&message, repeated_field, 1, 84);
+  EXPECT_EQ(84, r->GetRepeatedEnumValue(message, repeated_field, 1));
+  const google::protobuf::EnumValueDescriptor* enum_value = r->GetEnum(message,
+                                                             singular_field);
+  EXPECT_EQ(42, enum_value->number());
+}
+
+// Test that the EnumValue API works properly for proto2 messages as well.
+TEST(PreserveUnknownEnumTest, Proto2CatchesUnknownValues) {
+  protobuf_unittest::TestAllTypes message;  // proto2 message
+  const google::protobuf::Reflection* r = message.GetReflection();
+  const google::protobuf::Descriptor* d = message.GetDescriptor();
+  const google::protobuf::FieldDescriptor* repeated_field =
+      d->FindFieldByName("repeated_nested_enum");
+  // Add one element to the repeated field so that we can test
+  // SetRepeatedEnumValue.
+  const google::protobuf::EnumValueDescriptor* enum_value =
+      repeated_field->enum_type()->FindValueByName("BAR");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(enum_value != NULL);
+  r->AddEnum(&message, repeated_field, enum_value);
+
+#ifdef PROTOBUF_HAS_DEATH_TEST
+  const google::protobuf::FieldDescriptor* singular_field =
+      d->FindFieldByName("optional_nested_enum");
+  // Enum-field integer-based setters GOOGLE_DCHECK-fail on invalid values, in order to
+  // remain consistent with proto2 generated code.
+  EXPECT_DEBUG_DEATH({
+    r->SetEnumValue(&message, singular_field, 4242);
+    r->GetEnum(message, singular_field)->number();
+  }, "SetEnumValue accepts only valid integer values");
+  EXPECT_DEBUG_DEATH({
+    r->SetRepeatedEnumValue(&message, repeated_field, 0, 4242);
+    r->GetRepeatedEnum(message, repeated_field, 0);
+  }, "SetRepeatedEnumValue accepts only valid integer values");
+  EXPECT_DEBUG_DEATH({
+    r->AddEnumValue(&message, repeated_field, 4242);
+    r->GetRepeatedEnum(message, repeated_field, 1);
+  }, "AddEnumValue accepts only valid integer values");
+#endif  // PROTOBUF_HAS_DEATH_TEST
+}
+
+TEST(PreserveUnknownEnumTest, SupportsUnknownEnumValuesAPI) {
+  protobuf_unittest::TestAllTypes proto2_message;
+  proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessage new_message;
+
+  const google::protobuf::Reflection* proto2_reflection = proto2_message.GetReflection();
+  const google::protobuf::Reflection* new_reflection = new_message.GetReflection();
+
+  EXPECT_FALSE(proto2_reflection->SupportsUnknownEnumValues());
+  EXPECT_TRUE(new_reflection->SupportsUnknownEnumValues());
+}
+}  // namespace protobuf
+}  // namespace google