Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(104)

Unified Diff: third_party/protobuf/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/WellKnownTypes/FieldMask.cs

Issue 1842653006: Update //third_party/protobuf to version 3. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: merge Created 4 years, 8 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: third_party/protobuf/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/WellKnownTypes/FieldMask.cs
diff --git a/third_party/protobuf/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/WellKnownTypes/FieldMask.cs b/third_party/protobuf/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/WellKnownTypes/FieldMask.cs
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0cd5952a5d5b179f58da73a736a2f22967ffd3a6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/third_party/protobuf/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/WellKnownTypes/FieldMask.cs
@@ -0,0 +1,265 @@
+// Generated by the protocol buffer compiler. DO NOT EDIT!
+// source: google/protobuf/field_mask.proto
+#pragma warning disable 1591, 0612, 3021
+#region Designer generated code
+
+using pb = global::Google.Protobuf;
+using pbc = global::Google.Protobuf.Collections;
+using pbr = global::Google.Protobuf.Reflection;
+using scg = global::System.Collections.Generic;
+namespace Google.Protobuf.WellKnownTypes {
+
+ /// <summary>Holder for reflection information generated from google/protobuf/field_mask.proto</summary>
+ [global::System.Diagnostics.DebuggerNonUserCodeAttribute()]
+ public static partial class FieldMaskReflection {
+
+ #region Descriptor
+ /// <summary>File descriptor for google/protobuf/field_mask.proto</summary>
+ public static pbr::FileDescriptor Descriptor {
+ get { return descriptor; }
+ }
+ private static pbr::FileDescriptor descriptor;
+
+ static FieldMaskReflection() {
+ byte[] descriptorData = global::System.Convert.FromBase64String(
+ string.Concat(
+ "CiBnb29nbGUvcHJvdG9idWYvZmllbGRfbWFzay5wcm90bxIPZ29vZ2xlLnBy",
+ "b3RvYnVmIhoKCUZpZWxkTWFzaxINCgVwYXRocxgBIAMoCUJRChNjb20uZ29v",
+ "Z2xlLnByb3RvYnVmQg5GaWVsZE1hc2tQcm90b1ABoAEBogIDR1BCqgIeR29v",
+ "Z2xlLlByb3RvYnVmLldlbGxLbm93blR5cGVzYgZwcm90bzM="));
+ descriptor = pbr::FileDescriptor.FromGeneratedCode(descriptorData,
+ new pbr::FileDescriptor[] { },
+ new pbr::GeneratedCodeInfo(null, new pbr::GeneratedCodeInfo[] {
+ new pbr::GeneratedCodeInfo(typeof(global::Google.Protobuf.WellKnownTypes.FieldMask), global::Google.Protobuf.WellKnownTypes.FieldMask.Parser, new[]{ "Paths" }, null, null, null)
+ }));
+ }
+ #endregion
+
+ }
+ #region Messages
+ /// <summary>
+ /// `FieldMask` represents a set of symbolic field paths, for example:
+ ///
+ /// paths: "f.a"
+ /// paths: "f.b.d"
+ ///
+ /// Here `f` represents a field in some root message, `a` and `b`
+ /// fields in the message found in `f`, and `d` a field found in the
+ /// message in `f.b`.
+ ///
+ /// Field masks are used to specify a subset of fields that should be
+ /// returned by a get operation or modified by an update operation.
+ /// Field masks also have a custom JSON encoding (see below).
+ ///
+ /// # Field Masks in Projections
+ ///
+ /// When used in the context of a projection, a response message or
+ /// sub-message is filtered by the API to only contain those fields as
+ /// specified in the mask. For example, if the mask in the previous
+ /// example is applied to a response message as follows:
+ ///
+ /// f {
+ /// a : 22
+ /// b {
+ /// d : 1
+ /// x : 2
+ /// }
+ /// y : 13
+ /// }
+ /// z: 8
+ ///
+ /// The result will not contain specific values for fields x,y and z
+ /// (there value will be set to the default, and omitted in proto text
+ /// output):
+ ///
+ /// f {
+ /// a : 22
+ /// b {
+ /// d : 1
+ /// }
+ /// }
+ ///
+ /// A repeated field is not allowed except at the last position of a
+ /// field mask.
+ ///
+ /// If a FieldMask object is not present in a get operation, the
+ /// operation applies to all fields (as if a FieldMask of all fields
+ /// had been specified).
+ ///
+ /// Note that a field mask does not necessarily applies to the
+ /// top-level response message. In case of a REST get operation, the
+ /// field mask applies directly to the response, but in case of a REST
+ /// list operation, the mask instead applies to each individual message
+ /// in the returned resource list. In case of a REST custom method,
+ /// other definitions may be used. Where the mask applies will be
+ /// clearly documented together with its declaration in the API. In
+ /// any case, the effect on the returned resource/resources is required
+ /// behavior for APIs.
+ ///
+ /// # Field Masks in Update Operations
+ ///
+ /// A field mask in update operations specifies which fields of the
+ /// targeted resource are going to be updated. The API is required
+ /// to only change the values of the fields as specified in the mask
+ /// and leave the others untouched. If a resource is passed in to
+ /// describe the updated values, the API ignores the values of all
+ /// fields not covered by the mask.
+ ///
+ /// In order to reset a field's value to the default, the field must
+ /// be in the mask and set to the default value in the provided resource.
+ /// Hence, in order to reset all fields of a resource, provide a default
+ /// instance of the resource and set all fields in the mask, or do
+ /// not provide a mask as described below.
+ ///
+ /// If a field mask is not present on update, the operation applies to
+ /// all fields (as if a field mask of all fields has been specified).
+ /// Note that in the presence of schema evolution, this may mean that
+ /// fields the client does not know and has therefore not filled into
+ /// the request will be reset to their default. If this is unwanted
+ /// behavior, a specific service may require a client to always specify
+ /// a field mask, producing an error if not.
+ ///
+ /// As with get operations, the location of the resource which
+ /// describes the updated values in the request message depends on the
+ /// operation kind. In any case, the effect of the field mask is
+ /// required to be honored by the API.
+ ///
+ /// ## Considerations for HTTP REST
+ ///
+ /// The HTTP kind of an update operation which uses a field mask must
+ /// be set to PATCH instead of PUT in order to satisfy HTTP semantics
+ /// (PUT must only be used for full updates).
+ ///
+ /// # JSON Encoding of Field Masks
+ ///
+ /// In JSON, a field mask is encoded as a single string where paths are
+ /// separated by a comma. Fields name in each path are converted
+ /// to/from lower-camel naming conventions.
+ ///
+ /// As an example, consider the following message declarations:
+ ///
+ /// message Profile {
+ /// User user = 1;
+ /// Photo photo = 2;
+ /// }
+ /// message User {
+ /// string display_name = 1;
+ /// string address = 2;
+ /// }
+ ///
+ /// In proto a field mask for `Profile` may look as such:
+ ///
+ /// mask {
+ /// paths: "user.display_name"
+ /// paths: "photo"
+ /// }
+ ///
+ /// In JSON, the same mask is represented as below:
+ ///
+ /// {
+ /// mask: "user.displayName,photo"
+ /// }
+ /// </summary>
+ [global::System.Diagnostics.DebuggerNonUserCodeAttribute()]
+ public sealed partial class FieldMask : pb::IMessage<FieldMask> {
+ private static readonly pb::MessageParser<FieldMask> _parser = new pb::MessageParser<FieldMask>(() => new FieldMask());
+ public static pb::MessageParser<FieldMask> Parser { get { return _parser; } }
+
+ public static pbr::MessageDescriptor Descriptor {
+ get { return global::Google.Protobuf.WellKnownTypes.FieldMaskReflection.Descriptor.MessageTypes[0]; }
+ }
+
+ pbr::MessageDescriptor pb::IMessage.Descriptor {
+ get { return Descriptor; }
+ }
+
+ public FieldMask() {
+ OnConstruction();
+ }
+
+ partial void OnConstruction();
+
+ public FieldMask(FieldMask other) : this() {
+ paths_ = other.paths_.Clone();
+ }
+
+ public FieldMask Clone() {
+ return new FieldMask(this);
+ }
+
+ /// <summary>Field number for the "paths" field.</summary>
+ public const int PathsFieldNumber = 1;
+ private static readonly pb::FieldCodec<string> _repeated_paths_codec
+ = pb::FieldCodec.ForString(10);
+ private readonly pbc::RepeatedField<string> paths_ = new pbc::RepeatedField<string>();
+ /// <summary>
+ /// The set of field mask paths.
+ /// </summary>
+ public pbc::RepeatedField<string> Paths {
+ get { return paths_; }
+ }
+
+ public override bool Equals(object other) {
+ return Equals(other as FieldMask);
+ }
+
+ public bool Equals(FieldMask other) {
+ if (ReferenceEquals(other, null)) {
+ return false;
+ }
+ if (ReferenceEquals(other, this)) {
+ return true;
+ }
+ if(!paths_.Equals(other.paths_)) return false;
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ public override int GetHashCode() {
+ int hash = 1;
+ hash ^= paths_.GetHashCode();
+ return hash;
+ }
+
+ public override string ToString() {
+ return pb::JsonFormatter.ToDiagnosticString(this);
+ }
+
+ public void WriteTo(pb::CodedOutputStream output) {
+ paths_.WriteTo(output, _repeated_paths_codec);
+ }
+
+ public int CalculateSize() {
+ int size = 0;
+ size += paths_.CalculateSize(_repeated_paths_codec);
+ return size;
+ }
+
+ public void MergeFrom(FieldMask other) {
+ if (other == null) {
+ return;
+ }
+ paths_.Add(other.paths_);
+ }
+
+ public void MergeFrom(pb::CodedInputStream input) {
+ uint tag;
+ while ((tag = input.ReadTag()) != 0) {
+ switch(tag) {
+ default:
+ input.SkipLastField();
+ break;
+ case 10: {
+ paths_.AddEntriesFrom(input, _repeated_paths_codec);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ }
+
+ #endregion
+
+}
+
+#endregion Designer generated code

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698