OLD | NEW |
(Empty) | |
| 1 syntax = "proto3"; |
| 2 |
| 3 // These proto descriptors have at one time been reported as an issue or defect. |
| 4 // They are kept here to replicate the issue, and continue to verify the fix. |
| 5 |
| 6 // Issue: Non-"Google.Protobuffers" namespace will ensure that protobuffer libra
ry types are qualified |
| 7 option csharp_namespace = "UnitTest.Issues.TestProtos"; |
| 8 |
| 9 package unittest_issues; |
| 10 option optimize_for = SPEED; |
| 11 |
| 12 // Issue 307: when generating doubly-nested types, any references |
| 13 // should be of the form A.Types.B.Types.C. |
| 14 message Issue307 { |
| 15 message NestedOnce { |
| 16 message NestedTwice { |
| 17 } |
| 18 } |
| 19 } |
| 20 |
| 21 // Old issue 13: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=
13 |
| 22 // New issue 309: https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues/309 |
| 23 |
| 24 // message A { |
| 25 // optional int32 _A = 1; |
| 26 // } |
| 27 |
| 28 // message B { |
| 29 // optional int32 B_ = 1; |
| 30 // } |
| 31 |
| 32 //message AB { |
| 33 // optional int32 a_b = 1; |
| 34 //} |
| 35 |
| 36 // Similar issue with numeric names |
| 37 // Java code failed too, so probably best for this to be a restriction. |
| 38 // See https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues/308 |
| 39 // message NumberField { |
| 40 // optional int32 _01 = 1; |
| 41 // } |
| 42 |
| 43 // issue 19 - negative enum values |
| 44 |
| 45 enum NegativeEnum { |
| 46 NEGATIVE_ENUM_ZERO = 0; |
| 47 FiveBelow = -5; |
| 48 MinusOne = -1; |
| 49 } |
| 50 |
| 51 message NegativeEnumMessage { |
| 52 NegativeEnum value = 1; |
| 53 repeated NegativeEnum values = 2 [packed = false]; |
| 54 repeated NegativeEnum packed_values = 3 [packed=true]; |
| 55 } |
| 56 |
| 57 // Issue 21: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=21 |
| 58 // Decorate fields with [deprecated=true] as [System.Obsolete] |
| 59 |
| 60 message DeprecatedChild { |
| 61 } |
| 62 |
| 63 enum DeprecatedEnum { |
| 64 DEPRECATED_ZERO = 0; |
| 65 one = 1; |
| 66 } |
| 67 |
| 68 message DeprecatedFieldsMessage { |
| 69 int32 PrimitiveValue = 1 [deprecated = true]; |
| 70 repeated int32 PrimitiveArray = 2 [deprecated = true]; |
| 71 |
| 72 DeprecatedChild MessageValue = 3 [deprecated = true]; |
| 73 repeated DeprecatedChild MessageArray = 4 [deprecated = true]; |
| 74 |
| 75 DeprecatedEnum EnumValue = 5 [deprecated = true]; |
| 76 repeated DeprecatedEnum EnumArray = 6 [deprecated = true]; |
| 77 } |
| 78 |
| 79 // Issue 45: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=45 |
| 80 message ItemField { |
| 81 int32 item = 1; |
| 82 } |
| 83 |
| 84 message ReservedNames { |
| 85 // Force a nested type called Types |
| 86 message SomeNestedType { |
| 87 } |
| 88 |
| 89 int32 types = 1; |
| 90 int32 descriptor = 2; |
| 91 } |
| 92 |
| 93 message TestJsonFieldOrdering { |
| 94 // These fields are deliberately not declared in numeric |
| 95 // order, and the oneof fields aren't contiguous either. |
| 96 // This allows for reasonably robust tests of JSON output |
| 97 // ordering. |
| 98 // TestFieldOrderings in unittest_proto3.proto is similar, |
| 99 // but doesn't include oneofs. |
| 100 // TODO: Consider adding oneofs to TestFieldOrderings, although |
| 101 // that will require fixing other tests in multiple platforms. |
| 102 // Alternatively, consider just adding this to |
| 103 // unittest_proto3.proto if multiple platforms want it. |
| 104 |
| 105 int32 plain_int32 = 4; |
| 106 |
| 107 oneof o1 { |
| 108 string o1_string = 2; |
| 109 int32 o1_int32 = 5; |
| 110 } |
| 111 |
| 112 string plain_string = 1; |
| 113 |
| 114 oneof o2 { |
| 115 int32 o2_int32 = 6; |
| 116 string o2_string = 3; |
| 117 } |
| 118 |
| 119 } |
OLD | NEW |