Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(103)

Side by Side Diff: third_party/protobuf/csharp/protos/unittest_issues.proto

Issue 1842653006: Update //third_party/protobuf to version 3. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: merge Created 4 years, 8 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View unified diff | Download patch
OLDNEW
(Empty)
1 syntax = "proto3";
2
3 // These proto descriptors have at one time been reported as an issue or defect.
4 // They are kept here to replicate the issue, and continue to verify the fix.
5
6 // Issue: Non-"Google.Protobuffers" namespace will ensure that protobuffer libra ry types are qualified
7 option csharp_namespace = "UnitTest.Issues.TestProtos";
8
9 package unittest_issues;
10 option optimize_for = SPEED;
11
12 // Issue 307: when generating doubly-nested types, any references
13 // should be of the form A.Types.B.Types.C.
14 message Issue307 {
15 message NestedOnce {
16 message NestedTwice {
17 }
18 }
19 }
20
21 // Old issue 13: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id= 13
22 // New issue 309: https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues/309
23
24 // message A {
25 // optional int32 _A = 1;
26 // }
27
28 // message B {
29 // optional int32 B_ = 1;
30 // }
31
32 //message AB {
33 // optional int32 a_b = 1;
34 //}
35
36 // Similar issue with numeric names
37 // Java code failed too, so probably best for this to be a restriction.
38 // See https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues/308
39 // message NumberField {
40 // optional int32 _01 = 1;
41 // }
42
43 // issue 19 - negative enum values
44
45 enum NegativeEnum {
46 NEGATIVE_ENUM_ZERO = 0;
47 FiveBelow = -5;
48 MinusOne = -1;
49 }
50
51 message NegativeEnumMessage {
52 NegativeEnum value = 1;
53 repeated NegativeEnum values = 2 [packed = false];
54 repeated NegativeEnum packed_values = 3 [packed=true];
55 }
56
57 // Issue 21: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=21
58 // Decorate fields with [deprecated=true] as [System.Obsolete]
59
60 message DeprecatedChild {
61 }
62
63 enum DeprecatedEnum {
64 DEPRECATED_ZERO = 0;
65 one = 1;
66 }
67
68 message DeprecatedFieldsMessage {
69 int32 PrimitiveValue = 1 [deprecated = true];
70 repeated int32 PrimitiveArray = 2 [deprecated = true];
71
72 DeprecatedChild MessageValue = 3 [deprecated = true];
73 repeated DeprecatedChild MessageArray = 4 [deprecated = true];
74
75 DeprecatedEnum EnumValue = 5 [deprecated = true];
76 repeated DeprecatedEnum EnumArray = 6 [deprecated = true];
77 }
78
79 // Issue 45: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=45
80 message ItemField {
81 int32 item = 1;
82 }
83
84 message ReservedNames {
85 // Force a nested type called Types
86 message SomeNestedType {
87 }
88
89 int32 types = 1;
90 int32 descriptor = 2;
91 }
92
93 message TestJsonFieldOrdering {
94 // These fields are deliberately not declared in numeric
95 // order, and the oneof fields aren't contiguous either.
96 // This allows for reasonably robust tests of JSON output
97 // ordering.
98 // TestFieldOrderings in unittest_proto3.proto is similar,
99 // but doesn't include oneofs.
100 // TODO: Consider adding oneofs to TestFieldOrderings, although
101 // that will require fixing other tests in multiple platforms.
102 // Alternatively, consider just adding this to
103 // unittest_proto3.proto if multiple platforms want it.
104
105 int32 plain_int32 = 4;
106
107 oneof o1 {
108 string o1_string = 2;
109 int32 o1_int32 = 5;
110 }
111
112 string plain_string = 1;
113
114 oneof o2 {
115 int32 o2_int32 = 6;
116 string o2_string = 3;
117 }
118
119 }
OLDNEW
« no previous file with comments | « third_party/protobuf/csharp/keys/README.md ('k') | third_party/protobuf/csharp/src/AddressBook/AddPerson.cs » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698