Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(434)

Unified Diff: lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp

Issue 183273009: Prep for merging 3.4: Undo changes from 3.3 branch (Closed) Base URL: http://git.chromium.org/native_client/pnacl-llvm.git@master
Patch Set: Retry Created 6 years, 10 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « include/llvm/MC/MCELFObjectWriter.h ('k') | lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfDebug.cpp » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
diff --git a/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp b/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
index f876748af3dc1cab39a166d3be2861cf815cb134..6ea915fdb0b7690cbb8efdc07aececde3e5efe42 100644
--- a/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
+++ b/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
@@ -3937,19 +3937,10 @@ const SCEV *ScalarEvolution::createSCEV(Value *V) {
/// before taking the branch. For loops with multiple exits, it may not be the
/// number times that the loop header executes because the loop may exit
/// prematurely via another branch.
-///
-/// FIXME: We conservatively call getBackedgeTakenCount(L) instead of
-/// getExitCount(L, ExitingBlock) to compute a safe trip count considering all
-/// loop exits. getExitCount() may return an exact count for this branch
-/// assuming no-signed-wrap. The number of well-defined iterations may actually
-/// be higher than this trip count if this exit test is skipped and the loop
-/// exits via a different branch. Ideally, getExitCount() would know whether it
-/// depends on a NSW assumption, and we would only fall back to a conservative
-/// trip count in that case.
unsigned ScalarEvolution::
-getSmallConstantTripCount(Loop *L, BasicBlock */*ExitingBlock*/) {
+getSmallConstantTripCount(Loop *L, BasicBlock *ExitingBlock) {
const SCEVConstant *ExitCount =
- dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(getBackedgeTakenCount(L));
+ dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(getExitCount(L, ExitingBlock));
if (!ExitCount)
return 0;
@@ -3976,8 +3967,8 @@ getSmallConstantTripCount(Loop *L, BasicBlock */*ExitingBlock*/) {
/// As explained in the comments for getSmallConstantTripCount, this assumes
/// that control exits the loop via ExitingBlock.
unsigned ScalarEvolution::
-getSmallConstantTripMultiple(Loop *L, BasicBlock */*ExitingBlock*/) {
- const SCEV *ExitCount = getBackedgeTakenCount(L);
+getSmallConstantTripMultiple(Loop *L, BasicBlock *ExitingBlock) {
+ const SCEV *ExitCount = getExitCount(L, ExitingBlock);
if (ExitCount == getCouldNotCompute())
return 1;
@@ -4006,7 +3997,7 @@ getSmallConstantTripMultiple(Loop *L, BasicBlock */*ExitingBlock*/) {
}
// getExitCount - Get the expression for the number of loop iterations for which
-// this loop is guaranteed not to exit via ExitingBlock. Otherwise return
+// this loop is guaranteed not to exit via ExitintBlock. Otherwise return
// SCEVCouldNotCompute.
const SCEV *ScalarEvolution::getExitCount(Loop *L, BasicBlock *ExitingBlock) {
return getBackedgeTakenInfo(L).getExact(ExitingBlock, this);
@@ -4391,36 +4382,26 @@ ScalarEvolution::ComputeExitLimit(const Loop *L, BasicBlock *ExitingBlock) {
// Proceed to the next level to examine the exit condition expression.
return ComputeExitLimitFromCond(L, ExitBr->getCondition(),
ExitBr->getSuccessor(0),
- ExitBr->getSuccessor(1),
- /*IsSubExpr=*/false);
+ ExitBr->getSuccessor(1));
}
/// ComputeExitLimitFromCond - Compute the number of times the
/// backedge of the specified loop will execute if its exit condition
/// were a conditional branch of ExitCond, TBB, and FBB.
-///
-/// @param IsSubExpr is true if ExitCond does not directly control the exit
-/// branch. In this case, we cannot assume that the loop only exits when the
-/// condition is true and cannot infer that failing to meet the condition prior
-/// to integer wraparound results in undefined behavior.
ScalarEvolution::ExitLimit
ScalarEvolution::ComputeExitLimitFromCond(const Loop *L,
Value *ExitCond,
BasicBlock *TBB,
- BasicBlock *FBB,
- bool IsSubExpr) {
+ BasicBlock *FBB) {
// Check if the controlling expression for this loop is an And or Or.
if (BinaryOperator *BO = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(ExitCond)) {
if (BO->getOpcode() == Instruction::And) {
// Recurse on the operands of the and.
- bool EitherMayExit = L->contains(TBB);
- ExitLimit EL0 = ComputeExitLimitFromCond(L, BO->getOperand(0), TBB, FBB,
- IsSubExpr || EitherMayExit);
- ExitLimit EL1 = ComputeExitLimitFromCond(L, BO->getOperand(1), TBB, FBB,
- IsSubExpr || EitherMayExit);
+ ExitLimit EL0 = ComputeExitLimitFromCond(L, BO->getOperand(0), TBB, FBB);
+ ExitLimit EL1 = ComputeExitLimitFromCond(L, BO->getOperand(1), TBB, FBB);
const SCEV *BECount = getCouldNotCompute();
const SCEV *MaxBECount = getCouldNotCompute();
- if (EitherMayExit) {
+ if (L->contains(TBB)) {
// Both conditions must be true for the loop to continue executing.
// Choose the less conservative count.
if (EL0.Exact == getCouldNotCompute() ||
@@ -4448,14 +4429,11 @@ ScalarEvolution::ComputeExitLimitFromCond(const Loop *L,
}
if (BO->getOpcode() == Instruction::Or) {
// Recurse on the operands of the or.
- bool EitherMayExit = L->contains(FBB);
- ExitLimit EL0 = ComputeExitLimitFromCond(L, BO->getOperand(0), TBB, FBB,
- IsSubExpr || EitherMayExit);
- ExitLimit EL1 = ComputeExitLimitFromCond(L, BO->getOperand(1), TBB, FBB,
- IsSubExpr || EitherMayExit);
+ ExitLimit EL0 = ComputeExitLimitFromCond(L, BO->getOperand(0), TBB, FBB);
+ ExitLimit EL1 = ComputeExitLimitFromCond(L, BO->getOperand(1), TBB, FBB);
const SCEV *BECount = getCouldNotCompute();
const SCEV *MaxBECount = getCouldNotCompute();
- if (EitherMayExit) {
+ if (L->contains(FBB)) {
// Both conditions must be false for the loop to continue executing.
// Choose the less conservative count.
if (EL0.Exact == getCouldNotCompute() ||
@@ -4486,7 +4464,7 @@ ScalarEvolution::ComputeExitLimitFromCond(const Loop *L,
// With an icmp, it may be feasible to compute an exact backedge-taken count.
// Proceed to the next level to examine the icmp.
if (ICmpInst *ExitCondICmp = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(ExitCond))
- return ComputeExitLimitFromICmp(L, ExitCondICmp, TBB, FBB, IsSubExpr);
+ return ComputeExitLimitFromICmp(L, ExitCondICmp, TBB, FBB);
// Check for a constant condition. These are normally stripped out by
// SimplifyCFG, but ScalarEvolution may be used by a pass which wishes to
@@ -4512,8 +4490,7 @@ ScalarEvolution::ExitLimit
ScalarEvolution::ComputeExitLimitFromICmp(const Loop *L,
ICmpInst *ExitCond,
BasicBlock *TBB,
- BasicBlock *FBB,
- bool IsSubExpr) {
+ BasicBlock *FBB) {
// If the condition was exit on true, convert the condition to exit on false
ICmpInst::Predicate Cond;
@@ -4565,7 +4542,7 @@ ScalarEvolution::ComputeExitLimitFromICmp(const Loop *L,
switch (Cond) {
case ICmpInst::ICMP_NE: { // while (X != Y)
// Convert to: while (X-Y != 0)
- ExitLimit EL = HowFarToZero(getMinusSCEV(LHS, RHS), L, IsSubExpr);
+ ExitLimit EL = HowFarToZero(getMinusSCEV(LHS, RHS), L);
if (EL.hasAnyInfo()) return EL;
break;
}
@@ -4576,24 +4553,24 @@ ScalarEvolution::ComputeExitLimitFromICmp(const Loop *L,
break;
}
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT: {
- ExitLimit EL = HowManyLessThans(LHS, RHS, L, true, IsSubExpr);
+ ExitLimit EL = HowManyLessThans(LHS, RHS, L, true);
if (EL.hasAnyInfo()) return EL;
break;
}
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT: {
ExitLimit EL = HowManyLessThans(getNotSCEV(LHS),
- getNotSCEV(RHS), L, true, IsSubExpr);
+ getNotSCEV(RHS), L, true);
if (EL.hasAnyInfo()) return EL;
break;
}
case ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT: {
- ExitLimit EL = HowManyLessThans(LHS, RHS, L, false, IsSubExpr);
+ ExitLimit EL = HowManyLessThans(LHS, RHS, L, false);
if (EL.hasAnyInfo()) return EL;
break;
}
case ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT: {
ExitLimit EL = HowManyLessThans(getNotSCEV(LHS),
- getNotSCEV(RHS), L, false, IsSubExpr);
+ getNotSCEV(RHS), L, false);
if (EL.hasAnyInfo()) return EL;
break;
}
@@ -5462,7 +5439,7 @@ SolveQuadraticEquation(const SCEVAddRecExpr *AddRec, ScalarEvolution &SE) {
/// effectively V != 0. We know and take advantage of the fact that this
/// expression only being used in a comparison by zero context.
ScalarEvolution::ExitLimit
-ScalarEvolution::HowFarToZero(const SCEV *V, const Loop *L, bool IsSubExpr) {
+ScalarEvolution::HowFarToZero(const SCEV *V, const Loop *L) {
// If the value is a constant
if (const SCEVConstant *C = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(V)) {
// If the value is already zero, the branch will execute zero times.
@@ -5560,20 +5537,19 @@ ScalarEvolution::HowFarToZero(const SCEV *V, const Loop *L, bool IsSubExpr) {
}
// If the recurrence is known not to wraparound, unsigned divide computes the
- // back edge count. (Ideally we would have an "isexact" bit for udiv). We know
- // that the value will either become zero (and thus the loop terminates), that
- // the loop will terminate through some other exit condition first, or that
- // the loop has undefined behavior. This means we can't "miss" the exit
- // value, even with nonunit stride.
+ // back edge count. We know that the value will either become zero (and thus
+ // the loop terminates), that the loop will terminate through some other exit
+ // condition first, or that the loop has undefined behavior. This means
+ // we can't "miss" the exit value, even with nonunit stride.
//
- // This is only valid for expressions that directly compute the loop exit. It
- // is invalid for subexpressions in which the loop may exit through this
- // branch even if this subexpression is false. In that case, the trip count
- // computed by this udiv could be smaller than the number of well-defined
- // iterations.
- if (!IsSubExpr && AddRec->getNoWrapFlags(SCEV::FlagNW))
+ // FIXME: Prove that loops always exhibits *acceptable* undefined
+ // behavior. Loops must exhibit defined behavior until a wrapped value is
+ // actually used. So the trip count computed by udiv could be smaller than the
+ // number of well-defined iterations.
+ if (AddRec->getNoWrapFlags(SCEV::FlagNW)) {
+ // FIXME: We really want an "isexact" bit for udiv.
return getUDivExpr(Distance, CountDown ? getNegativeSCEV(Step) : Step);
-
+ }
// Then, try to solve the above equation provided that Start is constant.
if (const SCEVConstant *StartC = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(Start))
return SolveLinEquationWithOverflow(StepC->getValue()->getValue(),
@@ -6339,14 +6315,9 @@ const SCEV *ScalarEvolution::getBECount(const SCEV *Start,
/// HowManyLessThans - Return the number of times a backedge containing the
/// specified less-than comparison will execute. If not computable, return
/// CouldNotCompute.
-///
-/// @param IsSubExpr is true when the LHS < RHS condition does not directly
-/// control the branch. In this case, we can only compute an iteration count for
-/// a subexpression that cannot overflow before evaluating true.
ScalarEvolution::ExitLimit
ScalarEvolution::HowManyLessThans(const SCEV *LHS, const SCEV *RHS,
- const Loop *L, bool isSigned,
- bool IsSubExpr) {
+ const Loop *L, bool isSigned) {
// Only handle: "ADDREC < LoopInvariant".
if (!isLoopInvariant(RHS, L)) return getCouldNotCompute();
@@ -6355,12 +6326,10 @@ ScalarEvolution::HowManyLessThans(const SCEV *LHS, const SCEV *RHS,
return getCouldNotCompute();
// Check to see if we have a flag which makes analysis easy.
- bool NoWrap = false;
- if (!IsSubExpr) {
- NoWrap = AddRec->getNoWrapFlags(
- (SCEV::NoWrapFlags)(((isSigned ? SCEV::FlagNSW : SCEV::FlagNUW))
- | SCEV::FlagNW));
- }
+ bool NoWrap = isSigned ?
+ AddRec->getNoWrapFlags((SCEV::NoWrapFlags)(SCEV::FlagNSW | SCEV::FlagNW)) :
+ AddRec->getNoWrapFlags((SCEV::NoWrapFlags)(SCEV::FlagNUW | SCEV::FlagNW));
+
if (AddRec->isAffine()) {
unsigned BitWidth = getTypeSizeInBits(AddRec->getType());
const SCEV *Step = AddRec->getStepRecurrence(*this);
« no previous file with comments | « include/llvm/MC/MCELFObjectWriter.h ('k') | lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfDebug.cpp » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698