4 years, 9 months ago
(2016-03-24 22:44:13 UTC)
#1
Created Reland of Add bisect config validation.
chrisphan
lgtm What was the bug fix?
4 years, 9 months ago
(2016-03-24 22:54:21 UTC)
#2
lgtm
What was the bug fix?
qyearsley
On 2016/03/24 at 22:54:21, chrisphan wrote: > lgtm > > What was the bug fix? ...
4 years, 9 months ago
(2016-03-24 23:06:52 UTC)
#3
On 2016/03/24 at 22:54:21, chrisphan wrote:
> lgtm
>
> What was the bug fix?
Actually, there's no bug fix yet so for now this should be not lgtm -- I plan to
add the bug fix as a patch to this CL.
qyearsley
https://codereview.chromium.org/1827313002/diff/290001/scripts/slave/recipe_modules/auto_bisect/config_validation.py File scripts/slave/recipe_modules/auto_bisect/config_validation.py (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/1827313002/diff/290001/scripts/slave/recipe_modules/auto_bisect/config_validation.py#newcode52 scripts/slave/recipe_modules/auto_bisect/config_validation.py:52: if config.get(key) is None: This is the line that ...
4 years, 9 months ago
(2016-03-24 23:20:54 UTC)
#4
https://codereview.chromium.org/1827313002/diff/290001/scripts/slave/recipe_modules/auto_bisect/config_validation.py File scripts/slave/recipe_modules/auto_bisect/config_validation.py (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/1827313002/diff/290001/scripts/slave/recipe_modules/auto_bisect/config_validation.py#newcode52 scripts/slave/recipe_modules/auto_bisect/config_validation.py:52: if config.get(key) is None: On 2016/03/24 23:20:54, qyearsley wrote: ...
4 years, 9 months ago
(2016-03-24 23:24:58 UTC)
#5
https://codereview.chromium.org/1827313002/diff/290001/scripts/slave/recipe_m...
File scripts/slave/recipe_modules/auto_bisect/config_validation.py (right):
https://codereview.chromium.org/1827313002/diff/290001/scripts/slave/recipe_m...
scripts/slave/recipe_modules/auto_bisect/config_validation.py:52: if
config.get(key) is None:
On 2016/03/24 23:20:54, qyearsley wrote:
> This is the line that I changed for this patch that's different from before --
> if the field is optional (as "builder_host" and "builder_port" are), then None
> is always an acceptable value.
>
> However, if the value is required, then None is never acceptable.
>
> Does that seem reasonable?
Yup.
qyearsley
The CQ bit was checked by qyearsley@chromium.org to run a CQ dry run
4 years, 9 months ago
(2016-03-24 23:25:16 UTC)
#6
Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1827313002/290001 View timeline at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-timeline/1827313002/290001
4 years, 9 months ago
(2016-03-24 23:25:21 UTC)
#7
On 2016/03/24 at 23:25:24, commit-bot wrote: > Dry run: This issue passed the CQ dry ...
4 years, 9 months ago
(2016-03-25 21:27:43 UTC)
#11
On 2016/03/24 at 23:25:24, commit-bot wrote:
> Dry run: This issue passed the CQ dry run.
Roberto, Prasad, does this fix look OK to land?
qyearsley
On 2016/03/25 at 21:27:43, qyearsley wrote: > On 2016/03/24 at 23:25:24, commit-bot wrote: > > ...
4 years, 8 months ago
(2016-03-29 15:57:58 UTC)
#12
On 2016/03/25 at 21:27:43, qyearsley wrote:
> On 2016/03/24 at 23:25:24, commit-bot wrote:
> > Dry run: This issue passed the CQ dry run.
>
> Roberto, Prasad, does this fix look OK to land?
Ping
prasadv
lgtm
4 years, 8 months ago
(2016-03-30 17:44:05 UTC)
#13
lgtm
qyearsley
The CQ bit was checked by qyearsley@chromium.org
4 years, 8 months ago
(2016-03-30 17:45:26 UTC)
#14
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1827313002/310001 View timeline at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-timeline/1827313002/310001
4 years, 8 months ago
(2016-03-30 17:45:35 UTC)
#16
Issue 1827313002: Reland of Add bisect config validation.
(Closed)
Created 4 years, 9 months ago by qyearsley
Modified 4 years, 8 months ago
Reviewers: chrisphan, RobertoCN, prasadv
Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/tools/build.git@master
Comments: 2