Blacklist giant (4k) wbmp from GPU bots.

Blacklist giant (4k) wbmp from GPU bots.

BUG=skia:
GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search2?unt=true&query=source_type%3Dgm&master=false&issue=1827063004

Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/8c7d7ad59e3e0a56f9785456b872ed73de7a0834

[Brian Osman, 2016-03-24 15:52:50]

Description was changed from

==========
Blacklist giant (4k) wbmp from GPU bots.

BUG=skia:
==========

to

==========
Blacklist giant (4k) wbmp from GPU bots.

BUG=skia:
GOLD_TRYBOT_URL=
https://gold.skia.org/search2?unt=true&query=source_type%3Dgm&master=false&is...
==========

[Brian Osman, 2016-03-24 15:54:12]

brianosman@google.com changed reviewers:
+ bsalomon@google.com, msarett@google.com

[msarett, 2016-03-24 15:56:19]

lgtm

https://codereview.chromium.org/1827063004/diff/20001/tools/dm_flags.py
File tools/dm_flags.py (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/1827063004/diff/20001/tools/dm_flags.py#newco...
tools/dm_flags.py:190: # Blacklist RAW images (and a few large PNGs) on GPU bots
nit: Maybe this should now read

"Blacklist large images on GPU bots..."

[bsalomon, 2016-03-24 15:58:30]

Do we want to blacklist it from all GPU bots or just the failing MacMinis?

[msarett, 2016-03-24 16:01:48]

On 2016/03/24 15:58:30, bsalomon wrote:
> Do we want to blacklist it from all GPU bots or just the failing MacMinis?

Probably better to just do the MacMini.  I don't feel too strongly though, as it
looks like I wasn't very particular with the other images that I've blacklisted.

[Brian Osman, 2016-03-24 16:21:01]

Only blacklisting the mac bots. (Although now it looks like there is a windows
failure on another image...)

[msarett, 2016-03-24 16:24:44]

Windows failure looks flaky to me...  Also I don't think it's a GPU bot?

[Brian Osman, 2016-03-24 16:31:20]

On 2016/03/24 16:24:44, msarett wrote:
> Windows failure looks flaky to me...  Also I don't think it's a GPU bot?

Yeah, that was our (Robert & I) conclusion.

[msarett, 2016-03-24 17:06:13]

On 2016/03/24 16:31:20, Brian Osman wrote:
> On 2016/03/24 16:24:44, msarett wrote:
> > Windows failure looks flaky to me...  Also I don't think it's a GPU bot?
> 
> Yeah, that was our (Robert & I) conclusion.

Still lgtm btw

[Brian Osman, 2016-03-24 17:10:51]

The CQ bit was checked by brianosman@google.com

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-03-24 17:10:59]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1827063004/60001
View timeline at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-timeline/1827063004/60001

[msarett, 2016-03-24 17:23:33]

On 2016/03/24 17:10:59, commit-bot: I haz the power wrote:
> CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
>  https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1827063004/60001
> View timeline at
>  https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-timeline/1827063004/60001

Any chance the MacMini returns a bad value here?
https://code.google.com/p/chromium/codesearch#chromium/src/third_party/skia/d...

I don't think any of the other gpus even try to decode abnormal.wbmp.

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-03-24 17:33:44]

Description was changed from

==========
Blacklist giant (4k) wbmp from GPU bots.

BUG=skia:
GOLD_TRYBOT_URL=
https://gold.skia.org/search2?unt=true&query=source_type%3Dgm&master=false&is...
==========

to

==========
Blacklist giant (4k) wbmp from GPU bots.

BUG=skia:
GOLD_TRYBOT_URL=
https://gold.skia.org/search2?unt=true&query=source_type%3Dgm&master=false&is...

Committed:
https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/8c7d7ad59e3e0a56f9785456b872ed73de7a0834
==========

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-03-24 17:33:45]

Committed patchset #4 (id:60001) as
https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/8c7d7ad59e3e0a56f9785456b872ed73de7a0834