Migrated several tests from blink to V8 repository.

test/webkit/toString-prefix-postfix-preserve-parens.js

Index: test/webkit/toString-prefix-postfix-preserve-parens.js
diff --git a/test/webkit/toString-prefix-postfix-preserve-parens.js b/test/webkit/toString-prefix-postfix-preserve-parens.js
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..192f278a11657b2a12db7f5e7734f3d1790dac68
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/webkit/toString-prefix-postfix-preserve-parens.js
@@ -0,0 +1,154 @@
+// Copyright 2013 the V8 project authors. All rights reserved.
+// Copyright (C) 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.
+//
+// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
+// are met:
+// 1.  Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+//     notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+// 2.  Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
+//     notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
+//     documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
+//
+// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY APPLE INC. AND ITS CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND ANY
+// EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED
+// WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE
+// DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL APPLE INC. OR ITS CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY
+// DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES
+// (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES;
+// LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON
+// ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
+// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS
+// SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+
+description(
+"This test checks that toString() round-trip on a function that has prefix, postfix and typeof operators applied to group expression will not remove the grouping. Also checks that evaluation of such a expression produces run-time exception"
+);
+
+function postfix_should_preserve_parens(x, y, z) {
+    (x, y)++;
+    return y;
+}
+
+function prefix_should_preserve_parens(x, y, z) {
+    ++(x, y);
+    return x;
+
+}
+
+function both_should_preserve_parens(x, y, z) {
+    ++(x, y)--;
+    return x;
+
+}
+
+function postfix_should_preserve_parens_multi(x, y, z) {
+    (((x, y)))--;
+    return x;
+}
+
+function prefix_should_preserve_parens_multi(x, y, z) {
+    --(((x, y)));
+    return x;
+}
+
+function both_should_preserve_parens_multi(x, y, z) {
+    ++(((x, y)))--;
+    return x;
+}
+
+function postfix_should_preserve_parens_multi1(x, y, z) {
+    (((x)), y)--;
+    return x;
+}
+
+function prefix_should_preserve_parens_multi1(x, y, z) {
+    --(((x)), y);
+    return x;
+}
+
+function prefix_should_preserve_parens_multi2(x, y, z) {
+    var z = 0;
+    --(((x), y), z);
+    return x;
+}
+
+function postfix_should_preserve_parens_multi2(x, y, z) {
+    var z = 0;
+    (((x), y) ,z)++;
+    return x;
+}
+
+// if these return a variable (such as y) instead of
+// the result of typeof, this means that the parenthesis
+// got lost somewhere.
+function typeof_should_preserve_parens(x, y, z) {
+    return typeof (x, y);
+}
+
+function typeof_should_preserve_parens1(x, y, z) {
+    return typeof ((x, y));
+}
+
+function typeof_should_preserve_parens2(x, y, z) {
+    var z = 33;
+    return typeof (z, (x, y));
+}
+
+function typeof_should_preserve_parens_multi(x, y, z) {
+    var z = 33;
+    return typeof ((z,(((x, y)))));
+}
+
+unevalf = function(x) { return '(' + x.toString() + ')'; };
+
+function testToString(fn) {
+    // check that toString result evaluates to code that can be evaluated
+    // this doesn't actually reveal the bug that this test is testing
+    shouldBe("unevalf(eval(unevalf("+fn+")))", "unevalf(" + fn + ")");
+
+    // check that grouping operator is still there (this test reveals the bug
+    // but will create possible false negative if toString output changes in
+    // the future)
+    shouldBeTrue("/.*\\(+x\\)*, y\\)/.test(unevalf("+fn+"))");
+
+}
+
+function testToStringAndRTFailure(fn)
+{
+    testToString(fn);
+
+    // check that function call produces run-time exception
+    shouldThrow(""+fn+ "(1, 2, 3);");
+
+    // check that function call produces run-time exception after eval(unevalf)
+    shouldThrow("eval(unevalf("+fn+ "))(1, 2, 3);");
+}
+
+function testToStringAndReturn(fn, p1, p2, retval)
+{
+
+    testToString(fn);
+
+    // check that function call produces correct result
+    shouldBe("" + fn + "(" + p1 + ", " + p2 +");", retval);
+
+    // check that function call produces correct result after eval(unevalf)
+    shouldBe("eval(unevalf("+fn+ "))" + "(" + p1 + ", " + p2 +");", retval);
+}
+
+
+testToStringAndRTFailure("prefix_should_preserve_parens");
+testToStringAndRTFailure("postfix_should_preserve_parens");
+testToStringAndRTFailure("both_should_preserve_parens");
+testToStringAndRTFailure("prefix_should_preserve_parens_multi");
+testToStringAndRTFailure("postfix_should_preserve_parens_multi");
+testToStringAndRTFailure("prefix_should_preserve_parens_multi1");
+testToStringAndRTFailure("postfix_should_preserve_parens_multi1");
+testToStringAndRTFailure("prefix_should_preserve_parens_multi2");
+testToStringAndRTFailure("postfix_should_preserve_parens_multi2");
+
+testToStringAndReturn("typeof_should_preserve_parens", "'a'", 1, "'number'");
+testToStringAndReturn("typeof_should_preserve_parens1", "'a'", 1, "'number'");
+testToStringAndReturn("typeof_should_preserve_parens2", "'a'", 1, "'number'");
+testToStringAndReturn("typeof_should_preserve_parens_multi", "'a'", 1, "'number'");