Migrated several tests from blink to V8 repository.

test/webkit/date-utc-timeclip-expected.txt

Index: test/webkit/date-utc-timeclip-expected.txt
diff --git a/test/webkit/concat-while-having-a-bad-time-expected.txt b/test/webkit/date-utc-timeclip-expected.txt
similarity index 75%
copy from test/webkit/concat-while-having-a-bad-time-expected.txt
copy to test/webkit/date-utc-timeclip-expected.txt
index f949db98fd7b911d30b20281c82ee0f801405c77..4901631d59c8d8f729458d1be81c33c57fcac8f8 100644
--- a/test/webkit/concat-while-having-a-bad-time-expected.txt
+++ b/test/webkit/date-utc-timeclip-expected.txt
@@ -21,12 +21,19 @@
 # (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS
 # SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
 
-Tests the behavior of Array.prototype.concat while the array is having a bad time due to one of the elements we are concatenating.
+Date.UTC() should apply TimeClip operation according to ECMA-262.
 
 On success, you will see a series of "PASS" messages, followed by "TEST COMPLETE".
 
 
-PASS [42].concat() is [42]
+PASS Date.UTC(275760, 8, 12, 23, 59, 59, 999) is 8639999999999999
+PASS Date.UTC(275760, 8, 13) is 8640000000000000
+PASS isNaN(Date.UTC(275760, 8, 13, 0, 0, 0, 1)) is true
+PASS isNaN(Date.UTC(275760, 8, 14)) is true
+PASS Date.UTC(-271821, 3, 20, 0, 0, 0, 1) is -8639999999999999
+PASS Date.UTC(-271821, 3, 20) is -8640000000000000
+PASS isNaN(Date.UTC(-271821, 3, 19, 23, 59, 59, 999)) is true
+PASS isNaN(Date.UTC(-271821, 3, 19)) is true
 PASS successfullyParsed is true
 
 TEST COMPLETE