Revert 167680 "Move popular DOM attributes to prototype chains"

Revert 167680 "Move popular DOM attributes to prototype chains"

This CL caused unacceptable perf regression, because I landed the CL
before landing a V8 side CL that fixes the perf regression.

I'll land the CL again after landing the V8 side CL.

> Move popular DOM attributes to prototype chains
> 
> Design document: https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/document/d/1yeHTCHhulVIlrKyx9_gCguAhLfcefVOa9uxxfW2LVG0/edit
> 
> Intent-to-ship-and-implement in blink-dev: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!msg/blink-dev/t0XiZuMey7M/9-5AuhoFyisJ
> 
> This CL moves DOM attributes used in Dromaeo to prototype chains. When I landed the CL two months ago (https://codereview.chromium.org/94403002), it caused 20+% regression in benchmarks. However, now that a V8 side fix is landed, there should be no overhead in moving DOM attributes to prototype chains in theory.
> 
> Dromaeo/dom-attr 1086 runs/sec => 1077 runs/sec (-0.8%)
> Dromaeo/dom-modify 522 runs/sec => 525 runs/sec (+0.5%)
> Dromaeo/dom-query 26150 runs/sec => 26200 runs/sec (+0.2%)
> Dromaeo/dom-traverse 564 runs/sec => 544 runs/sec (-3.6%)
> 
> I don't understand the regression in dom-traverse. The regression is reproducible but I cannot reproduce the regression in a super-micro benchmark that just repeats accessing div.firstChild. Probably the regression might be a noise.
> 
> I'm going to land this CL and see how much regression is observed in perf bots (I'll email to perf-sheriff@). If I find the regression is unacceptable, I'll revert the CL.
> 
> See the design document and the Intent-to-ship email for justification for the regression.
> 
> BUG=43394
> 
> Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/158713002

TBR=haraken@chromium.org

Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/blink?view=rev&revision=167722

[haraken, 2014-02-25 05:44:51]

Committed patchset #1 manually as r167722.