Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(239)

Unified Diff: third_party/WebKit/Source/core/style/FillLayer.cpp

Issue 1787733003: Consolidate background fill layer opaqueness into one method (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: A new way to refactor Created 4 years, 9 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: third_party/WebKit/Source/core/style/FillLayer.cpp
diff --git a/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/style/FillLayer.cpp b/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/style/FillLayer.cpp
index fd248537ea206ce98593c9aa8954f2487f991b5f..5941fb654956f7e53d470660b16a2425160eed7a 100644
--- a/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/style/FillLayer.cpp
+++ b/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/style/FillLayer.cpp
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
#include "core/style/FillLayer.h"
+#include "core/layout/LayoutObject.h"
#include "core/style/DataEquivalency.h"
namespace blink {
@@ -370,27 +371,40 @@ bool FillLayer::imagesAreLoaded() const
return true;
}
-bool FillLayer::hasOpaqueImage(const LayoutObject* layoutObject) const
+bool FillLayer::imageIsOpaqueAndTilesLayer(const LayoutObject& layoutObject) const
Stephen Chennney 2016/03/16 20:54:16 Put almost all the conditions surround images here
{
- if (!m_image)
- return false;
+ // Returns true if we have an image and tiling that will cover the content below it when
+ // m_composite == CompositeSourceOver && m_blendMode == WebBlendModeNormal.
+ // Otherwise false.
+ // TODO(schenney) We could relax the repeat mode requirement if we also knew the rect we
+ // had to fill, and the portion of the image we need to use, and know that the latter
+ // covers the former
+ return m_image
+ && m_image->canRender()
Stephen Chennney 2016/03/16 20:54:16 Forgot to remove these. Will follow up.
+ && m_image->knownToBeOpaque(layoutObject)
+ && !m_image->imageSize(layoutObject, layoutObject.style()->effectiveZoom(), LayoutSize()).isEmpty()
+ && (m_repeatX == RepeatFill || m_repeatX == RoundFill)
+ && (m_repeatY == RepeatFill || m_repeatY == RoundFill);
- // TODO(trchen): Should check blend mode before composite mode.
- if (m_composite == CompositeClear || m_composite == CompositeCopy)
- return true;
+}
- if (m_blendMode != WebBlendModeNormal)
+bool FillLayer::imageOccludesNextLayers(const LayoutObject& layoutObject) const
Stephen Chennney 2016/03/16 20:54:16 Due to the compositing modes behavior, it's not re
+{
+ // We can't cover without an image, regardless of other parameters
+ if (!m_image || !m_image->canRender())
return false;
- if (m_composite == CompositeSourceOver)
- return m_image->knownToBeOpaque(*layoutObject);
-
- return false;
-}
+ if (imageIsOpaqueAndTilesLayer(layoutObject)) {
+ // Check that the compositing and blend modes maintain the opaqueness
+ return (m_composite == CompositeClear
+ || m_composite == CompositeCopy
+ || m_composite == CompositeSourceOver)
+ && m_blendMode == WebBlendModeNormal;
+ }
-bool FillLayer::hasRepeatXY() const
-{
- return m_repeatX == RepeatFill && m_repeatY == RepeatFill;
+ // The image is not opaque, but these composite modes overwrite the background
+ // regardless of the foreground.
+ return (m_composite == CompositeClear || m_composite == CompositeCopy);
Stephen Chennney 2016/03/16 20:54:16 This is really the else clause, but we do not put
}
static inline bool layerImagesIdentical(const FillLayer& layer1, const FillLayer& layer2)

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698