Index: LayoutTests/inspector/elements/styles/edit-inspector-stylesheet.html |
diff --git a/LayoutTests/inspector/elements/styles/edit-inspector-stylesheet.html b/LayoutTests/inspector/elements/styles/edit-inspector-stylesheet.html |
index 1890c0e351973db6cf671292750dd507f082001e..7b07fdfcfd920202e24349bdb485158e254fc626 100644 |
--- a/LayoutTests/inspector/elements/styles/edit-inspector-stylesheet.html |
+++ b/LayoutTests/inspector/elements/styles/edit-inspector-stylesheet.html |
@@ -14,24 +14,13 @@ function test() |
function step1(node) |
{ |
- WebInspector.cssModel.addRule(node.id, "#inspected", successCallback, failureCallback); |
- |
- function successCallback() |
- { |
- InspectorTest.waitForStyles("inspected", stylesReceived, true); |
lushnikov
2014/02/28 11:55:59
Is this step skipped intentionally? Why?
vsevik
2014/02/28 14:35:28
addNewRule will callback after the styles are rece
|
- } |
+ InspectorTest.addNewRule("#inspected", stylesReceived); |
function stylesReceived() |
{ |
// UISourceCode.prototype.addRevision() must finish before step2 is called. |
InspectorTest.showScriptSource("inspector-stylesheet", step2); |
} |
- |
- function failureCallback() |
- { |
- InspectorTest.addResult("Failed to add rule."); |
- InspectorTest.completeTest(); |
- } |
} |
function step2(sourceFrame) |