Remove special-code used by the old (removed) multicol implementation.

Remove special-code used by the old (removed) multicol implementation.

In regular block flow, anonymous blocks always have inline children, unless
it's the part of a continuation chain that contains blocks (which should never
be merged with siblings). Anonymous blocks with block-children also occur in
flexbox (flex items), and in the ruby implementation, but otherwise never in
regular block container layout.

Committed: https://crrev.com/8a846777c358c69996d5143f99e869014a1940cb
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#380381}

[mstensho (USE GERRIT), 2016-03-08 10:26:33]

Description was changed from

==========
Remove special code used by the old (removed) multicol implementation.

In regular block flow, anonymous blocks always have inline children, unless
it's the part of a continuation chain that contains blocks (which should never
be merged with siblings). Anonymous blocks with block-children also occur in
flexbox (flex items), and in the ruby implementation, but otherwise never in
regular block container layout.
==========

to

==========
Remove special code used by the old (removed) multicol implementation.

In regular block flow, anonymous blocks always have inline children, unless
it's the part of a continuation chain that contains blocks (which should never
be merged with siblings). Anonymous blocks with block-children also occur in
flexbox (flex items), and in the ruby implementation, but otherwise never in
regular block container layout.
==========

[mstensho (USE GERRIT), 2016-03-08 10:26:43]

Description was changed from

==========
Remove special code used by the old (removed) multicol implementation.

In regular block flow, anonymous blocks always have inline children, unless
it's the part of a continuation chain that contains blocks (which should never
be merged with siblings). Anonymous blocks with block-children also occur in
flexbox (flex items), and in the ruby implementation, but otherwise never in
regular block container layout.
==========

to

==========
Remove special-code used by the old (removed) multicol implementation.

In regular block flow, anonymous blocks always have inline children, unless
it's the part of a continuation chain that contains blocks (which should never
be merged with siblings). Anonymous blocks with block-children also occur in
flexbox (flex items), and in the ruby implementation, but otherwise never in
regular block container layout.
==========

[mstensho (USE GERRIT), 2016-03-09 20:30:08]

mstensho@opera.com changed reviewers:
+ eae@chromium.org, robhogan@gmail.com

[eae, 2016-03-09 21:13:50]

Very nice, tack sa mycket! LGTM

[eae, 2016-03-09 21:13:56]

The CQ bit was checked by eae@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-03-09 21:14:22]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1778463002/1
View timeline at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-timeline/1778463002/1

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-03-10 01:05:21]

The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-03-10 01:05:22]

Try jobs failed on following builders:
  win_chromium_rel_ng on tryserver.chromium.win (JOB_FAILED,
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.win/builders/win_chromium_rel_...)

[mstensho (USE GERRIT), 2016-03-10 07:44:23]

The CQ bit was checked by mstensho@opera.com

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-03-10 07:44:39]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1778463002/1
View timeline at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-timeline/1778463002/1

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-03-10 09:19:47]

Description was changed from

==========
Remove special-code used by the old (removed) multicol implementation.

In regular block flow, anonymous blocks always have inline children, unless
it's the part of a continuation chain that contains blocks (which should never
be merged with siblings). Anonymous blocks with block-children also occur in
flexbox (flex items), and in the ruby implementation, but otherwise never in
regular block container layout.
==========

to

==========
Remove special-code used by the old (removed) multicol implementation.

In regular block flow, anonymous blocks always have inline children, unless
it's the part of a continuation chain that contains blocks (which should never
be merged with siblings). Anonymous blocks with block-children also occur in
flexbox (flex items), and in the ruby implementation, but otherwise never in
regular block container layout.
==========

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-03-10 09:19:48]

Committed patchset #1 (id:1)

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-03-10 09:21:17]

Description was changed from

==========
Remove special-code used by the old (removed) multicol implementation.

In regular block flow, anonymous blocks always have inline children, unless
it's the part of a continuation chain that contains blocks (which should never
be merged with siblings). Anonymous blocks with block-children also occur in
flexbox (flex items), and in the ruby implementation, but otherwise never in
regular block container layout.
==========

to

==========
Remove special-code used by the old (removed) multicol implementation.

In regular block flow, anonymous blocks always have inline children, unless
it's the part of a continuation chain that contains blocks (which should never
be merged with siblings). Anonymous blocks with block-children also occur in
flexbox (flex items), and in the ruby implementation, but otherwise never in
regular block container layout.

Committed: https://crrev.com/8a846777c358c69996d5143f99e869014a1940cb
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#380381}
==========

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-03-10 09:21:18]

Patchset 1 (id:??) landed as
https://crrev.com/8a846777c358c69996d5143f99e869014a1940cb
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#380381}