Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(96)

Issue 1759893002: Only place primitive objects on the V8 global template. (Closed)

Created:
4 years, 9 months ago by Tom Sepez
Modified:
4 years, 9 months ago
CC:
pdfium-reviews_googlegroups.com
Base URL:
https://pdfium.googlesource.com/pdfium.git@master
Target Ref:
refs/heads/master
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Only place primitive objects on the V8 global template. Kill some crummy comments along the way. BUG=pdfium:419 R=jochen@chromium.org Committed: https://pdfium.googlesource.com/pdfium/+/3e44a7bd2b60ace1ee8bc8f48c709056f65c3dc1

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 1

Patch Set 2 : Make only one array per context. #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+112 lines, -187 lines) Patch
M fpdfsdk/include/jsapi/fxjs_v8.h View 1 chunk +1 line, -1 line 0 comments Download
M fpdfsdk/src/javascript/Consts.cpp View 1 6 chunks +92 lines, -181 lines 0 comments Download
M fpdfsdk/src/javascript/JS_Runtime.h View 1 2 chunks +4 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M fpdfsdk/src/javascript/JS_Runtime.cpp View 1 1 chunk +9 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M fpdfsdk/src/jsapi/fxjs_v8.cpp View 1 chunk +6 lines, -5 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 14 (4 generated)
Tom Sepez
Jochen, please review. This implements the approach you outlined in the bug. Thanks!
4 years, 9 months ago (2016-03-02 19:46:47 UTC) #3
Tom Sepez
https://codereview.chromium.org/1759893002/diff/1/fpdfsdk/src/javascript/Consts.cpp File fpdfsdk/src/javascript/Consts.cpp (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/1759893002/diff/1/fpdfsdk/src/javascript/Consts.cpp#newcode103 fpdfsdk/src/javascript/Consts.cpp:103: #define GLOBAL_STRING(rt, name, value) \ Note: there are JS ...
4 years, 9 months ago (2016-03-02 20:02:49 UTC) #5
jochen (gone - plz use gerrit)
lgtm
4 years, 9 months ago (2016-03-03 06:50:32 UTC) #6
Charles Lew
I'm curious that after this change, does something like "RE_PHONE_COMMIT === RE_PHONE_COMMIT" still evaluates to ...
4 years, 9 months ago (2016-03-03 15:22:09 UTC) #7
Tom Sepez
On 2016/03/03 15:22:09, Charles Lew wrote: > I'm curious that after this change, does something ...
4 years, 9 months ago (2016-03-03 17:54:50 UTC) #8
Tom Sepez
On 2016/03/03 17:54:50, Tom Sepez wrote: > On 2016/03/03 15:22:09, Charles Lew wrote: > > ...
4 years, 9 months ago (2016-03-03 18:09:51 UTC) #9
Tom Sepez
On 2016/03/03 18:09:51, Tom Sepez wrote: > On 2016/03/03 17:54:50, Tom Sepez wrote: > > ...
4 years, 9 months ago (2016-03-03 18:20:39 UTC) #10
Tom Sepez
Please review PS#2.
4 years, 9 months ago (2016-03-03 19:09:30 UTC) #11
jochen (gone - plz use gerrit)
still lgtm
4 years, 9 months ago (2016-03-04 09:45:21 UTC) #12
Tom Sepez
4 years, 9 months ago (2016-03-04 20:25:37 UTC) #14
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Committed patchset #2 (id:20001) manually as
3e44a7bd2b60ace1ee8bc8f48c709056f65c3dc1 (presubmit successful).

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698