Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(1825)

Unified Diff: remoting/protocol/negotiating_client_authenticator.cc

Issue 1755273003: Simplify AuthenticationMethod type and PIN hash handling. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: Created 4 years, 10 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: remoting/protocol/negotiating_client_authenticator.cc
diff --git a/remoting/protocol/negotiating_client_authenticator.cc b/remoting/protocol/negotiating_client_authenticator.cc
index 17b6c770b6885c11fad070a15c435e2175759fea..2a2247efaed6306386fbcdd4cadfc00e6989f315 100644
--- a/remoting/protocol/negotiating_client_authenticator.cc
+++ b/remoting/protocol/negotiating_client_authenticator.cc
@@ -51,13 +51,13 @@ void NegotiatingClientAuthenticator::ProcessMessage(
DCHECK_EQ(state(), WAITING_MESSAGE);
std::string method_attr = message->Attr(kMethodAttributeQName);
- AuthenticationMethod method = AuthenticationMethod::FromString(method_attr);
+ AuthenticationMethod method = ParseAuthenticationMethodString(method_attr);
// The host picked a method different from the one the client had selected.
if (method != current_method_) {
// The host must pick a method that is valid and supported by the client,
// and it must not change methods after it has picked one.
- if (method_set_by_host_ || !method.is_valid() ||
+ if (method_set_by_host_ || method == AuthenticationMethod::INVALID ||
std::find(methods_.begin(), methods_.end(), method) == methods_.end()) {
state_ = REJECTED;
rejection_reason_ = PROTOCOL_ERROR;
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ scoped_ptr<buzz::XmlElement> NegotiatingClientAuthenticator::GetNextMessage() {
DCHECK_EQ(state(), MESSAGE_READY);
// This is the first message to the host, send a list of supported methods.
- if (!current_method_.is_valid()) {
+ if (current_method_ == AuthenticationMethod::INVALID) {
// If no authentication method has been chosen, see if we can optimistically
// choose one.
scoped_ptr<buzz::XmlElement> result;
@@ -97,14 +97,13 @@ scoped_ptr<buzz::XmlElement> NegotiatingClientAuthenticator::GetNextMessage() {
}
// Include a list of supported methods.
- std::stringstream supported_methods(std::stringstream::out);
- for (std::vector<AuthenticationMethod>::iterator it = methods_.begin();
- it != methods_.end(); ++it) {
- if (it != methods_.begin())
- supported_methods << kSupportedMethodsSeparator;
- supported_methods << it->ToString();
+ std::string supported_methods;
kelvinp 2016/03/04 18:40:54 Out of curiosity, why do we switch from stringstre
Sergey Ulanov 2016/03/04 20:48:51 I don't know why thought it was a good idea when I
+ for (AuthenticationMethod method : methods_) {
+ if (!supported_methods.empty())
+ supported_methods += kSupportedMethodsSeparator;
+ supported_methods += AuthenticationMethodToString(method);
}
- result->AddAttr(kSupportedMethodsAttributeQName, supported_methods.str());
+ result->AddAttr(kSupportedMethodsAttributeQName, supported_methods);
state_ = WAITING_MESSAGE;
return result;
}
@@ -114,8 +113,8 @@ scoped_ptr<buzz::XmlElement> NegotiatingClientAuthenticator::GetNextMessage() {
void NegotiatingClientAuthenticator::CreateAuthenticatorForCurrentMethod(
Authenticator::State preferred_initial_state,
const base::Closure& resume_callback) {
- DCHECK(current_method_.is_valid());
- if (current_method_.type() == AuthenticationMethod::THIRD_PARTY) {
+ DCHECK(current_method_ != AuthenticationMethod::INVALID);
+ if (current_method_ == AuthenticationMethod::THIRD_PARTY) {
// |ThirdPartyClientAuthenticator| takes ownership of |token_fetcher_|.
// The authentication method negotiation logic should guarantee that only
// one |ThirdPartyClientAuthenticator| will need to be created per session.
@@ -124,10 +123,12 @@ void NegotiatingClientAuthenticator::CreateAuthenticatorForCurrentMethod(
std::move(token_fetcher_)));
resume_callback.Run();
} else {
- DCHECK(current_method_.type() == AuthenticationMethod::SPAKE2 ||
- current_method_.type() == AuthenticationMethod::SPAKE2_PAIR);
+ DCHECK(current_method_ ==
+ AuthenticationMethod::SPAKE2_SHARED_SECRET_PLAIN ||
+ current_method_ == AuthenticationMethod::SPAKE2_SHARED_SECRET_HMAC ||
+ current_method_ == AuthenticationMethod::SPAKE2_PAIR);
bool pairing_supported =
- (current_method_.type() == AuthenticationMethod::SPAKE2_PAIR);
+ (current_method_ == AuthenticationMethod::SPAKE2_PAIR);
SecretFetchedCallback callback = base::Bind(
&NegotiatingClientAuthenticator::CreateV2AuthenticatorWithSecret,
weak_factory_.GetWeakPtr(), preferred_initial_state, resume_callback);
@@ -138,13 +139,13 @@ void NegotiatingClientAuthenticator::CreateAuthenticatorForCurrentMethod(
void NegotiatingClientAuthenticator::CreatePreferredAuthenticator() {
if (!client_pairing_id_.empty() && !shared_secret_.empty() &&
std::find(methods_.begin(), methods_.end(),
- AuthenticationMethod::Spake2Pair()) != methods_.end()) {
+ AuthenticationMethod::SPAKE2_PAIR) != methods_.end()) {
// If the client specified a pairing id and shared secret, then create a
// PairingAuthenticator.
current_authenticator_.reset(new PairingClientAuthenticator(
client_pairing_id_, shared_secret_, fetch_secret_callback_,
authentication_tag_));
- current_method_ = AuthenticationMethod::Spake2Pair();
+ current_method_ = AuthenticationMethod::SPAKE2_PAIR;
}
}
@@ -153,8 +154,9 @@ void NegotiatingClientAuthenticator::CreateV2AuthenticatorWithSecret(
const base::Closure& resume_callback,
const std::string& shared_secret) {
current_authenticator_ = V2Authenticator::CreateForClient(
- AuthenticationMethod::ApplyHashFunction(
- current_method_.hash_function(), authentication_tag_, shared_secret),
+ ApplySharedSecretHashFunction(
+ GetHashFunctionForAuthenticationMethod(current_method_),
+ authentication_tag_, shared_secret),
initial_state);
resume_callback.Run();
}
« no previous file with comments | « remoting/protocol/negotiating_authenticator_unittest.cc ('k') | remoting/protocol/negotiating_host_authenticator.h » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698