Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(579)

Unified Diff: net/quic/crypto/proof_verifier_chromium.cc

Issue 17385010: OpenSSL/NSS implementation of ProofVerfifier. (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src
Patch Set: Fix compiler error Created 7 years, 6 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: net/quic/crypto/proof_verifier_chromium.cc
diff --git a/net/quic/crypto/proof_verifier_chromium.cc b/net/quic/crypto/proof_verifier_chromium.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8cd21b67cf712408540b8eaa0d6b888692a7b162
--- /dev/null
+++ b/net/quic/crypto/proof_verifier_chromium.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,204 @@
+// Copyright 2013 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "net/quic/crypto/proof_verifier_chromium.h"
+
+#include "base/bind.h"
+#include "base/bind_helpers.h"
+#include "base/callback_helpers.h"
+#include "base/compiler_specific.h"
+#include "base/logging.h"
+#include "crypto/signature_verifier.h"
+#include "net/base/net_errors.h"
+#include "net/base/net_log.h"
+#include "net/cert/asn1_util.h"
+#include "net/cert/cert_status_flags.h"
+#include "net/cert/cert_verifier.h"
+#include "net/cert/cert_verify_result.h"
+#include "net/cert/single_request_cert_verifier.h"
+#include "net/cert/x509_certificate.h"
+#include "net/cert/x509_util.h"
+#include "net/quic/crypto/crypto_protocol.h"
+#include "net/ssl/ssl_config_service.h"
+
+using base::StringPiece;
+using std::string;
+using std::vector;
+
+namespace net {
+
+ProofVerifierChromium::ProofVerifierChromium(CertVerifier* cert_verifier)
+ : cert_verifier_(cert_verifier),
+ completed_cert_verification_(false),
+ server_cert_(NULL),
+ next_cert_state_(STATE_NONE) {
+}
+
+ProofVerifierChromium::~ProofVerifierChromium() {
+ verifier_.reset();
+
+ // Reset object state.
+ callback_.Reset();
+ server_cert_verify_result_.Reset();
+ completed_cert_verification_ = false;
+}
+
+int ProofVerifierChromium::VerifyProof(const string& hostname,
+ const string& server_config,
+ const vector<string>& certs,
+ const string& signature,
+ const CompletionCallback& callback,
+ string* error_details) {
+ // We call VerifySignature first to avoid copying of server_config data.
wtc 2013/06/24 22:36:56 server_config => server_config and signature. Rem
ramant (doing other things) 2013/06/28 19:16:56 Done.
+ if (!VerifySignature(server_config, signature, certs[0])) {
+ *error_details = "Failed to verify signature of server config";
+ return ERR_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ hostname_ = hostname;
+ callback_ = callback;
+ completed_cert_verification_ = false;
+
+ int error = VerifyChain(certs);
+ if (error <= ERR_FAILED) {
+ *error_details = "Failed to verify certificate chain";
+ // TODO(rtenneti): do we need to save the original |error|?
wtc 2013/06/24 22:36:56 I suggest saving the original |error| in string fo
ramant (doing other things) 2013/06/28 19:16:56 Done.
+ error = ERR_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ return error;
+}
+
+int ProofVerifierChromium::VerifyChain(const vector<string>& certs) {
+ if (certs.empty()) {
+ DLOG(WARNING) << "certs are empty";
+ return ERR_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ // Convert certs to X509.
wtc 2013/06/24 22:36:56 X509 => X509Certificate
ramant (doing other things) 2013/06/28 19:16:56 Done.
+ vector<StringPiece> v(certs.size());
+ for (unsigned i = 0; i < certs.size(); i++) {
+ v[i] = base::StringPiece(certs[i]);
+ }
+ server_cert_ = X509Certificate::CreateFromDERCertChain(v);
+ if (!server_cert_.get()) {
+ server_cert_verify_result_.Reset();
+ server_cert_verify_result_.cert_status = CERT_STATUS_INVALID;
+ return ERR_FAILED;
wtc 2013/06/24 22:36:56 ERR_FAILED => ERR_CERT_INVALID
ramant (doing other things) 2013/06/28 19:16:56 Done.
+ }
+
+ // Let's verify the certificate.
+ next_cert_state_ = STATE_VERIFY_CERT;
+ return DoVerifyCertLoop(OK);
+}
+
+int ProofVerifierChromium::DoVerifyCertLoop(int last_result) {
+ int rv = last_result;
+ do {
+ State state = next_cert_state_;
+ next_cert_state_ = STATE_NONE;
+ switch (state) {
+ case STATE_VERIFY_CERT:
+ DCHECK(rv == OK);
+ rv = DoVerifyCert(rv);
+ break;
+ case STATE_VERIFY_CERT_COMPLETE:
+ rv = DoVerifyCertComplete(rv);
+ break;
+ case STATE_NONE:
+ default:
+ rv = ERR_UNEXPECTED;
+ LOG(DFATAL) << "unexpected state " << state;
+ break;
+ }
+ } while (rv != ERR_IO_PENDING && next_cert_state_ != STATE_NONE);
+ return rv;
+}
+
+void ProofVerifierChromium::OnVerifyCertIOComplete(int result) {
+ int rv = DoVerifyCertLoop(result);
+ if (rv != ERR_IO_PENDING) {
+ // TODO(rtenneti): do we need to save the original |rv|?
+ base::ResetAndReturn(&callback_).Run(rv >= OK ? OK : ERR_FAILED);
wtc 2013/06/24 22:36:56 We should pass just |rv| to Run(). The error code
ramant (doing other things) 2013/06/28 19:16:56 Done.
+ }
+}
+
+int ProofVerifierChromium::DoVerifyCert(int result) {
+ next_cert_state_ = STATE_VERIFY_CERT_COMPLETE;
+
+ // TODO(rtenneti): Are the following flags correct??
wtc 2013/06/24 22:36:56 Let's start with the following: int flags = Cert
ramant (doing other things) 2013/06/28 19:16:56 Done.
+ int flags = 0;
+ flags |= CertVerifier::VERIFY_REV_CHECKING_ENABLED; //
+ flags |= CertVerifier::VERIFY_EV_CERT; //
+ flags |= CertVerifier::VERIFY_CERT_IO_ENABLED;
+ verifier_.reset(new SingleRequestCertVerifier(cert_verifier_));
+ return verifier_->Verify(
+ server_cert_.get(),
+ hostname_,
+ flags,
+ SSLConfigService::GetCRLSet().get(),
+ &server_cert_verify_result_,
+ base::Bind(&ProofVerifierChromium::OnVerifyCertIOComplete,
+ base::Unretained(this)),
+ net_log_);
+}
+
+int ProofVerifierChromium::DoVerifyCertComplete(int result) {
+ verifier_.reset();
+
+ completed_cert_verification_ = true;
+
+ // Exit DoVerifyCertLoop and return the result to the caller to ProofVerify.
+ DCHECK_EQ(STATE_NONE, next_cert_state_);
+ return result;
+}
+
+// static
+bool ProofVerifierChromium::VerifySignature(const string& signed_data,
+ const string& signature,
+ const string& cert) {
+ StringPiece spki;
+ if (!asn1::ExtractSPKIFromDERCert(cert, &spki)) {
+ DLOG(WARNING) << "ExtractSPKIFromDERCert failed";
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ // We use the signature verifier to perform signature verification.
+ crypto::SignatureVerifier verifier;
+
+ // TODO(rtenneti): Define the algorithm ID for RSA_PKCS1_PSS_PADDING based on
+ // the cert.
+
+ // This is the algorithm ID for SHA-256 with EC encryption.
+ const uint8 kECDSAWithSHA256AlgorithmID[] = {
+ 0x30, 0x0c,
+ 0x06, 0x08,
+ 0x2a, 0x86, 0x48, 0xce, 0x3d, 0x04, 0x03, 0x02,
+ 0x05, 0x00
+ };
+
+ if (!verifier.VerifyInit(
+ kECDSAWithSHA256AlgorithmID, sizeof(kECDSAWithSHA256AlgorithmID),
+ reinterpret_cast<const uint8*>(signature.data()),
+ signature.size(),
+ reinterpret_cast<const uint8*>(spki.data()),
+ spki.size())) {
+ DLOG(WARNING) << "VerifyInit failed";
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ verifier.VerifyUpdate(reinterpret_cast<const uint8*>(kProofSignatureLabel),
+ sizeof(kProofSignatureLabel));
+ verifier.VerifyUpdate(reinterpret_cast<const uint8*>(signed_data.data()),
+ signed_data.size());
+
+ if (!verifier.VerifyFinal()) {
+ DLOG(WARNING) << "VerifyFinal failed";
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+} // namespace net

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698