Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(351)

Unified Diff: cc/resources/raster_worker_pool.cc

Issue 17351017: Re-land: cc: Add raster finished signals to RasterWorkerPool. (Closed) Base URL: http://git.chromium.org/chromium/src.git@new-graph-build
Patch Set: add missing code Created 7 years, 6 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: cc/resources/raster_worker_pool.cc
diff --git a/cc/resources/raster_worker_pool.cc b/cc/resources/raster_worker_pool.cc
index 5f356e5b2122a304eb8eda800af5fd09e0914d3d..9ccef6ac924e839b9d8742ad3261752b047e2ba9 100644
--- a/cc/resources/raster_worker_pool.cc
+++ b/cc/resources/raster_worker_pool.cc
@@ -335,7 +335,8 @@ RasterWorkerPool::RasterTask::~RasterTask() {
RasterWorkerPool::RasterTaskGraph::RasterTaskGraph()
: raster_finished_node_(new GraphNode),
- next_priority_(1u) {
+ raster_required_for_activation_finished_node_(new GraphNode),
+ next_priority_(2u) { // priority 0-1 is reserved for OnRasterFinished.
}
RasterWorkerPool::RasterTaskGraph::~RasterTaskGraph() {
@@ -343,7 +344,8 @@ RasterWorkerPool::RasterTaskGraph::~RasterTaskGraph() {
void RasterWorkerPool::RasterTaskGraph::InsertRasterTask(
internal::WorkerPoolTask* raster_task,
- const TaskVector& decode_tasks) {
+ const TaskVector& decode_tasks,
+ bool required_for_activation) {
DCHECK(!raster_task->HasCompleted());
DCHECK(graph_.find(raster_task) == graph_.end());
@@ -380,6 +382,12 @@ void RasterWorkerPool::RasterTaskGraph::InsertRasterTask(
raster_finished_node_->add_dependency();
raster_node->add_dependent(raster_finished_node_.get());
+ if (required_for_activation) {
+ raster_required_for_activation_finished_node_->add_dependency();
vmpstr 2013/06/21 18:38:33 Could you maybe add required_for_activation_task a
reveman 2013/06/24 16:04:03 Done.
+ raster_node->add_dependent(
+ raster_required_for_activation_finished_node_.get());
+ }
+
graph_.set(raster_task, raster_node.Pass());
}
@@ -436,12 +444,12 @@ void RasterWorkerPool::SetClient(RasterWorkerPoolClient* client) {
}
void RasterWorkerPool::Shutdown() {
+ // Cancel any pending OnRasterFinished callbacks.
+ weak_ptr_factory_.InvalidateWeakPtrs();
+ raster_tasks_.clear();
TaskGraph empty;
SetTaskGraph(&empty);
WorkerPool::Shutdown();
- raster_tasks_.clear();
- // Cancel any pending OnRasterFinished callback.
- weak_ptr_factory_.InvalidateWeakPtrs();
}
void RasterWorkerPool::SetRasterTasks(RasterTask::Queue* queue) {
@@ -453,15 +461,11 @@ void RasterWorkerPool::SetRasterTasks(RasterTask::Queue* queue) {
void RasterWorkerPool::SetRasterTaskGraph(RasterTaskGraph* graph) {
scoped_ptr<GraphNode> raster_finished_node(
graph->raster_finished_node_.Pass());
+ scoped_ptr<GraphNode> raster_required_for_activation_finished_node(
+ graph->raster_required_for_activation_finished_node_.Pass());
TaskGraph new_graph;
new_graph.swap(graph->graph_);
- if (new_graph.empty()) {
- SetTaskGraph(&new_graph);
- raster_finished_task_ = NULL;
- return;
- }
-
++schedule_raster_tasks_count_;
scoped_refptr<internal::WorkerPoolTask> new_raster_finished_task(
@@ -469,12 +473,34 @@ void RasterWorkerPool::SetRasterTaskGraph(RasterTaskGraph* graph) {
base::MessageLoopProxy::current(),
base::Bind(&RasterWorkerPool::OnRasterFinished,
weak_ptr_factory_.GetWeakPtr(),
- schedule_raster_tasks_count_)));
+ schedule_raster_tasks_count_,
+ base::Bind(&RasterWorkerPool::OnRasterTasksFinished,
+ weak_ptr_factory_.GetWeakPtr()))));
raster_finished_node->set_task(new_raster_finished_task.get());
- // Insert "raster finished" task before switching to new graph.
+ raster_finished_node->set_priority(1u);
new_graph.set(new_raster_finished_task.get(), raster_finished_node.Pass());
+
+ scoped_refptr<internal::WorkerPoolTask>
+ new_raster_required_for_activation_finished_task(
+ new RasterFinishedWorkerPoolTaskImpl(
+ base::MessageLoopProxy::current(),
+ base::Bind(&RasterWorkerPool::OnRasterFinished,
+ weak_ptr_factory_.GetWeakPtr(),
+ schedule_raster_tasks_count_,
+ base::Bind(&RasterWorkerPool::
vmpstr 2013/06/21 18:38:33 Would it be better if we just explicitly call this
reveman 2013/06/24 16:04:03 Done. I used two levels of bind here to avoid OnRa
+ OnRasterTasksRequiredForActivationFinished,
+ weak_ptr_factory_.GetWeakPtr()))));
+ raster_required_for_activation_finished_node->set_task(
+ new_raster_required_for_activation_finished_task.get());
+ raster_required_for_activation_finished_node->set_priority(0u);
+ new_graph.set(new_raster_required_for_activation_finished_task.get(),
+ raster_required_for_activation_finished_node.Pass());
+
SetTaskGraph(&new_graph);
+
raster_finished_task_.swap(new_raster_finished_task);
+ raster_required_for_activation_finished_task_.swap(
+ new_raster_required_for_activation_finished_task);
}
bool RasterWorkerPool::IsRasterTaskRequiredForActivation(
@@ -484,14 +510,16 @@ bool RasterWorkerPool::IsRasterTaskRequiredForActivation(
raster_tasks_required_for_activation_.end();
}
-void RasterWorkerPool::OnRasterFinished(int64 schedule_raster_tasks_count) {
+void RasterWorkerPool::OnRasterFinished(
+ int64 schedule_raster_tasks_count,
+ const base::Closure& on_raster_tasks_finished_callback) {
TRACE_EVENT1("cc", "RasterWorkerPool::OnRasterFinished",
"schedule_raster_tasks_count", schedule_raster_tasks_count);
DCHECK_GE(schedule_raster_tasks_count_, schedule_raster_tasks_count);
- // Call OnRasterTasksFinished() when we've finished running all raster
- // tasks needed since last time SetRasterTaskGraph() was called.
+ // Run |on_raster_tasks_finished_callback| if this callback is associated
+ // with the last call to SetRasterTaskGraph().
if (schedule_raster_tasks_count_ == schedule_raster_tasks_count)
- OnRasterTasksFinished();
+ on_raster_tasks_finished_callback.Run();
}
} // namespace cc

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698