Chromium Code Reviews| Index: net/quic/quic_utils.cc |
| diff --git a/net/quic/quic_utils.cc b/net/quic/quic_utils.cc |
| index ee0455ba93179157523db34fe194709b055ae07c..2c990226baba783933076c0dae2a1c3d6bed3865 100644 |
| --- a/net/quic/quic_utils.cc |
| +++ b/net/quic/quic_utils.cc |
| @@ -56,22 +56,9 @@ uint128 IncrementalHashFast(uint128 uhash, const char* data, size_t len) { |
| } |
| #endif |
| -uint128 IncrementalHashSlow(uint128 hash, const char* data, size_t len) { |
| - // kPrime = 309485009821345068724781371 |
| - static const uint128 kPrime(16777216, 315); |
| - const uint8_t* octets = reinterpret_cast<const uint8_t*>(data); |
| - for (size_t i = 0; i < len; ++i) { |
| - hash = hash ^ uint128(0, octets[i]); |
| - hash = hash * kPrime; |
| - } |
| - return hash; |
| -} |
|
Ryan Hamilton
2016/02/23 23:40:43
Since this method is used below, I don't think you
Buck
2016/02/26 18:54:22
Done. Whoops, this was my merge error. I made a
|
| - |
| uint128 IncrementalHash(uint128 hash, const char* data, size_t len) { |
| #ifdef QUIC_UTIL_HAS_UINT128 |
| - return FLAGS_quic_utils_use_fast_incremental_hash |
| - ? IncrementalHashFast(hash, data, len) |
| - : IncrementalHashSlow(hash, data, len); |
| + return IncrementalHashFast(hash, data, len); |
| #else |
| return IncrementalHashSlow(hash, data, len); |
| #endif |