Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(169)

Unified Diff: net/http/http_cache_unittest.cc

Issue 17217: When there are multiple requests for the same resource, it is possible that c... (Closed) Base URL: svn://chrome-svn/chrome/trunk/src/
Patch Set: '' Created 11 years, 11 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « net/http/http_cache.cc ('k') | no next file » | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: net/http/http_cache_unittest.cc
===================================================================
--- net/http/http_cache_unittest.cc (revision 7627)
+++ net/http/http_cache_unittest.cc (working copy)
@@ -532,6 +532,80 @@
}
}
+// This is a test for http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=4769.
+// If cancelling a request is racing with another request for the same resource
+// finishing, we have to make sure that we remove both transactions from the
+// entry.
+TEST(HttpCache, SimpleGET_RacingReaders) {
+ MockHttpCache cache;
+
+ MockHttpRequest request(kSimpleGET_Transaction);
+ MockHttpRequest reader_request(kSimpleGET_Transaction);
+ reader_request.load_flags = net::LOAD_ONLY_FROM_CACHE;
+
+ std::vector<Context*> context_list;
+ const int kNumTransactions = 5;
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < kNumTransactions; ++i) {
+ context_list.push_back(
+ new Context(cache.http_cache()->CreateTransaction()));
+
+ Context* c = context_list[i];
+ MockHttpRequest* this_request = &request;
+ if (i == 1 || i == 2)
+ this_request = &reader_request;
+
+ int rv = c->trans->Start(this_request, &c->callback);
+ if (rv != net::ERR_IO_PENDING)
+ c->result = rv;
+ }
+
+ // The first request should be a writer at this point, and the subsequent
+ // requests should be pending.
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, cache.network_layer()->transaction_count());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, cache.disk_cache()->open_count());
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, cache.disk_cache()->create_count());
+
+ Context* c = context_list[0];
+ ASSERT_EQ(net::ERR_IO_PENDING, c->result);
+ c->result = c->callback.WaitForResult();
+ ReadAndVerifyTransaction(c->trans.get(), kSimpleGET_Transaction);
+
+ // Now we have 2 active readers and two queued transactions.
+
+ c = context_list[1];
+ ASSERT_EQ(net::ERR_IO_PENDING, c->result);
+ c->result = c->callback.WaitForResult();
+ ReadAndVerifyTransaction(c->trans.get(), kSimpleGET_Transaction);
+
+ // At this point we have one reader, two pending transactions and a task on
+ // the queue to move to the next transaction. Now we cancel the request that
+ // is the current reader, and expect the queued task to be able to start the
+ // next request.
+
+ c = context_list[2];
+ c->trans.reset();
+
+ for (int i = 3; i < kNumTransactions; ++i) {
+ Context* c = context_list[i];
+ if (c->result == net::ERR_IO_PENDING)
+ c->result = c->callback.WaitForResult();
+ ReadAndVerifyTransaction(c->trans.get(), kSimpleGET_Transaction);
+ }
+
+ // We should not have had to re-open the disk entry.
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, cache.network_layer()->transaction_count());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, cache.disk_cache()->open_count());
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, cache.disk_cache()->create_count());
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < kNumTransactions; ++i) {
+ Context* c = context_list[i];
+ delete c;
+ }
+}
+
TEST(HttpCache, SimpleGET_ManyWriters_CancelFirst) {
MockHttpCache cache;
« no previous file with comments | « net/http/http_cache.cc ('k') | no next file » | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698