| Index: content/browser/loader/resource_dispatcher_host_unittest.cc
|
| diff --git a/content/browser/loader/resource_dispatcher_host_unittest.cc b/content/browser/loader/resource_dispatcher_host_unittest.cc
|
| index 79a8f80a084ab1f0b553e5dc2c1ac527f5cb6e1c..f36aaed8ffdef27ec0629ab6226230f61534d525 100644
|
| --- a/content/browser/loader/resource_dispatcher_host_unittest.cc
|
| +++ b/content/browser/loader/resource_dispatcher_host_unittest.cc
|
| @@ -1873,29 +1873,26 @@ TEST_P(ResourceDispatcherHostTest, CancelRequestsOnRenderFrameDeleted) {
|
| EXPECT_EQ(2, network_delegate_.created_requests());
|
| EXPECT_EQ(0, network_delegate_.canceled_requests());
|
|
|
| - // The same RenderView issues two more low priority requests. The
|
| - // ResourceScheduler shouldn't let them start immediately.
|
| + // The same RenderView issues two more low priority requests.
|
| MakeTestRequestWithPriorityAndRenderFrame(0, 10, 3, net::LOWEST);
|
| MakeTestRequestWithPriorityAndRenderFrame(0, 11, 4, net::LOWEST);
|
| KickOffRequest();
|
| - EXPECT_EQ(2, network_delegate_.created_requests());
|
| + EXPECT_EQ(4, network_delegate_.created_requests());
|
| EXPECT_EQ(0, network_delegate_.canceled_requests());
|
|
|
| - // Another RenderView in the same process as the old one issues a request,
|
| - // which is then started.
|
| + // Another RenderView in the same process as the old one issues a request.
|
| MakeTestRequestWithPriorityAndRenderFrame(1, 12, 5, net::LOWEST);
|
| KickOffRequest();
|
| - EXPECT_EQ(3, network_delegate_.created_requests());
|
| + EXPECT_EQ(5, network_delegate_.created_requests());
|
| EXPECT_EQ(0, network_delegate_.canceled_requests());
|
|
|
| // The first two RenderFrameHosts are destroyed. All 4 of their requests
|
| - // should be cancelled, and none of the two deferred requests should be
|
| - // started.
|
| + // should be cancelled.
|
| DeleteRenderFrame(GlobalFrameRoutingId(filter_->child_id(), 10));
|
| DeleteRenderFrame(GlobalFrameRoutingId(filter_->child_id(), 11));
|
| host_.OnRenderViewHostDeleted(filter_->child_id(), 0);
|
| base::RunLoop().RunUntilIdle();
|
| - EXPECT_EQ(3, network_delegate_.created_requests());
|
| + EXPECT_EQ(5, network_delegate_.created_requests());
|
| EXPECT_EQ(4, network_delegate_.canceled_requests());
|
|
|
| // No messages should have been sent, since none of the jobs made any
|
| @@ -3559,23 +3556,20 @@ TEST_P(ResourceDispatcherHostTest, DidChangePriority) {
|
| job_factory_->SetDelayedCompleteJobGeneration(true);
|
| SetResponse("HTTP/1.1 200 OK\n\n", "<title>Dummy body</title>");
|
|
|
| - // Only one idle priority request will run while a high-priority request
|
| - // exists.
|
| - MakeTestRequestWithPriority(0, 1, net::HIGHEST);
|
| - MakeTestRequestWithPriority(0, 2, net::IDLE);
|
| - MakeTestRequestWithPriority(0, 3, net::IDLE);
|
| -
|
| + MakeTestRequestWithPriority(0, 1, net::IDLE);
|
| KickOffRequest();
|
|
|
| - EXPECT_EQ(2, job_factory_->url_request_jobs_created_count());
|
| + ResourceLoader* loader = host_.GetLoader(filter_->child_id(), 1);
|
| + EXPECT_EQ(net::IDLE, loader->request()->priority());
|
|
|
| - // Increase the priority of the second idle priority request. It was
|
| - // scheduled later, so it is not currently running.
|
| - ResourceHostMsg_DidChangePriority priority_msg(3, net::MAXIMUM_PRIORITY, 0);
|
| + // Increase the priority of the request. Actual scheduling logic is tested
|
| + // in the ResourceScheduler unit tests, this only tests that the message
|
| + // is delivered and the priority of the request is changed.
|
| + ResourceHostMsg_DidChangePriority priority_msg(1, net::MAXIMUM_PRIORITY, 0);
|
| host_.OnMessageReceived(priority_msg, filter_.get());
|
| base::MessageLoop::current()->RunUntilIdle();
|
|
|
| - EXPECT_EQ(3, job_factory_->url_request_jobs_created_count());
|
| + EXPECT_EQ(net::MAXIMUM_PRIORITY, loader->request()->priority());
|
|
|
| // Cleanup.
|
| host_.OnRenderViewHostDeleted(filter_->child_id(), // child_id
|
|
|