Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(649)

Unified Diff: base/task_scheduler/scheduler_lock_unittest.cc

Issue 1706123002: TaskScheduler [2/9] Scheduler Lock (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: CR Feedback Created 4 years, 10 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: base/task_scheduler/scheduler_lock_unittest.cc
diff --git a/base/task_scheduler/scheduler_lock_unittest.cc b/base/task_scheduler/scheduler_lock_unittest.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..48964e93741aad2106f1215b5468bb687ccc3d93
--- /dev/null
+++ b/base/task_scheduler/scheduler_lock_unittest.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,257 @@
+// Copyright 2016 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "base/task_scheduler/scheduler_lock.h"
+
+#include <stdlib.h>
+
+#include "base/compiler_specific.h"
+#include "base/macros.h"
+#include "base/rand_util.h"
+#include "base/synchronization/waitable_event.h"
+#include "base/threading/platform_thread.h"
+#include "testing/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h"
+
+namespace base {
+namespace internal {
+
+// Adapted from base::Lock's BasicLockTestThread to make sure
+// Acquire()/Release() don't crash.
+class BasicLockTestThread : public PlatformThread::Delegate {
+ public:
+ explicit BasicLockTestThread(SchedulerLock* lock)
+ : lock_(lock),
+ acquired_(0) {}
+
+ void ThreadMain() override {
+ for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
+ lock_->Acquire();
+ acquired_++;
+ lock_->Release();
+ }
+ for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
+ lock_->Acquire();
+ acquired_++;
+ PlatformThread::Sleep(TimeDelta::FromMilliseconds(base::RandInt(0, 19)));
+ lock_->Release();
+ }
+ }
+
+ int acquired() const { return acquired_; }
+
+ private:
+ SchedulerLock* const lock_;
+ int acquired_;
+
+ DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(BasicLockTestThread);
+};
+
+class BasicLockAcquireAndWaitThread : public PlatformThread::Delegate {
+ public:
+ explicit BasicLockAcquireAndWaitThread(SchedulerLock* lock)
+ : lock_(lock),
+ lock_acquire_event_(false, false),
+ main_thread_continue_event_(false, false) {}
+
+ void ThreadMain() override {
+ lock_->Acquire();
+ lock_acquire_event_.Signal();
+ main_thread_continue_event_.Wait();
+ lock_->Release();
+ }
+
+ void WaitForLockAcquisition() {
+ lock_acquire_event_.Wait();
+ }
+
+ void ContinueMain() {
+ main_thread_continue_event_.Signal();
+ }
+
+ private:
+ SchedulerLock* const lock_;
+ WaitableEvent lock_acquire_event_;
+ WaitableEvent main_thread_continue_event_;
+
+ DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(BasicLockAcquireAndWaitThread);
+};
+
+TEST(TaskSchedulerLock, Basic) {
+ SchedulerLock lock;
+ BasicLockTestThread thread(&lock);
+ PlatformThreadHandle handle;
+
+ ASSERT_TRUE(PlatformThread::Create(0, &thread, &handle));
+
+ int acquired = 0;
+ for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
+ lock.Acquire();
+ acquired++;
+ lock.Release();
+ }
+ for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
+ lock.Acquire();
+ acquired++;
+ PlatformThread::Sleep(TimeDelta::FromMilliseconds(rand() % 20));
+ lock.Release();
+ }
+ for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
+ lock.Acquire();
+ acquired++;
+ PlatformThread::Sleep(TimeDelta::FromMilliseconds(rand() % 20));
+ lock.Release();
+ }
+
+ PlatformThread::Join(handle);
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(acquired, 20);
+ EXPECT_EQ(thread.acquired(), 20);
+}
+
+TEST(TaskSchedulerLock, AcquirePredecessor) {
+ SchedulerLock predecessor;
+ SchedulerLock lock(&predecessor);
+ predecessor.Acquire();
+ lock.Acquire();
+ lock.Release();
+ predecessor.Release();
+}
+
+TEST(TaskSchedulerLock, AcquireNonPredecessor) {
+ SchedulerLock lock1;
+ SchedulerLock lock2;
+ EXPECT_DEBUG_DEATH({
+ lock1.Acquire();
+ lock2.Acquire();
+ }, "");
+}
+
+TEST(TaskSchedulerLock, AcquireMultipleLocksInOrder) {
+ SchedulerLock lock1;
+ SchedulerLock lock2(&lock1);
+ SchedulerLock lock3(&lock2);
+ lock1.Acquire();
+ lock2.Acquire();
+ lock3.Acquire();
+ lock3.Release();
+ lock2.Release();
+ lock1.Release();
+}
+
+TEST(TaskSchedulerLock, AcquireMultipleLocksInTheMiddleOfAChain) {
+ SchedulerLock lock1;
+ SchedulerLock lock2(&lock1);
+ SchedulerLock lock3(&lock2);
+ lock2.Acquire();
+ lock3.Acquire();
+ lock3.Release();
+ lock2.Release();
+}
+
+TEST(TaskSchedulerLock, AcquireMultipleLocksNoTransitivity) {
+ SchedulerLock lock1;
+ SchedulerLock lock2(&lock1);
+ SchedulerLock lock3(&lock2);
+ EXPECT_DEBUG_DEATH({
+ lock1.Acquire();
+ lock3.Acquire();
+ }, "");
+}
+
+TEST(TaskSchedulerLock, AcquireLocksDifferentThreadsSafely) {
+ SchedulerLock lock1;
+ SchedulerLock lock2;
+ BasicLockAcquireAndWaitThread thread(&lock1);
+ PlatformThreadHandle handle;
+ ASSERT_TRUE(PlatformThread::Create(0, &thread, &handle));
+
+ lock2.Acquire();
+ thread.WaitForLockAcquisition();
+ thread.ContinueMain();
+ PlatformThread::Join(handle);
+ lock2.Release();
+}
gab 2016/02/19 22:05:24 What is this now testing that the next two tests a
robliao 2016/02/19 23:51:12 This tests the absence of any predecessor relation
+
+TEST(TaskSchedulerLock,
+ AcquireLocksWithPredecessorDifferentThreadsSafely1PredecessorFirst) {
+ // A lock and its predecessor may be safely acquired on different threads.
+ // This Thread Other Thread
+ // predecessor.Acquire()
+ // lock.Acquire()
+ // predecessor.Release()
+ // lock.Release()
+ SchedulerLock predecessor;
+ SchedulerLock lock(&predecessor);
+ predecessor.Acquire();
+ BasicLockAcquireAndWaitThread thread(&lock);
+ PlatformThreadHandle handle;
+ ASSERT_TRUE(PlatformThread::Create(0, &thread, &handle));
+ thread.WaitForLockAcquisition();
+ predecessor.Release();
+ thread.ContinueMain();
+ PlatformThread::Join(handle);
+}
+
+TEST(TaskSchedulerLock,
+ AcquireLocksWithPredecessorDifferentThreadsSafely1PredecessorLast) {
+ // A lock and its predecessor may be safely acquired on different threads.
+ // This Thread Other Thread
+ // lock.Acquire()
+ // predecessor.Acquire()
+ // lock.Release()
+ // predecessor.Release()
+ SchedulerLock predecessor;
+ SchedulerLock lock(&predecessor);
+ lock.Acquire();
+ BasicLockAcquireAndWaitThread thread(&predecessor);
+ PlatformThreadHandle handle;
+ ASSERT_TRUE(PlatformThread::Create(0, &thread, &handle));
+ thread.WaitForLockAcquisition();
+ lock.Release();
+ thread.ContinueMain();
+ PlatformThread::Join(handle);
+}
+
+TEST(TaskSchedulerLock, SelfReferentialLock) {
+ struct SelfReferentialLock {
+ SelfReferentialLock() : lock(&lock) {}
+
+ SchedulerLock lock;
+ };
+
+ EXPECT_DEBUG_DEATH({ SelfReferentialLock lock; }, "");
+}
+
+TEST(TaskSchedulerLock, PredecessorCycle) {
+ struct LockCycle {
+ LockCycle() : lock1(&lock2), lock2(&lock1) {}
+
+ SchedulerLock lock1;
+ SchedulerLock lock2;
+ };
+
+ EXPECT_DEBUG_DEATH({ LockCycle cycle; }, "");
+}
+
+TEST(TaskSchedulerLock, PredecessorLongerCycle) {
+ struct LockCycle {
+ LockCycle()
+ : lock1(&lock5),
+ lock2(&lock1),
+ lock3(&lock2),
+ lock4(&lock3),
+ lock5(&lock4) {}
+
+ SchedulerLock lock1;
+ SchedulerLock lock2;
+ SchedulerLock lock3;
+ SchedulerLock lock4;
+ SchedulerLock lock5;
+ };
+
+ EXPECT_DEBUG_DEATH({ LockCycle cycle; }, "");
+}
+
+} // namespace internal
+} // base
« base/task_scheduler/scheduler_lock_impl.h ('K') | « base/task_scheduler/scheduler_lock_impl.cc ('k') | no next file » | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698