Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(586)

Unified Diff: base/task_scheduler/task_tracker_unittest.cc

Issue 1705943002: TaskScheduler [5/9] Task Tracker (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@s_3_pq
Patch Set: self review Created 4 years, 9 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: base/task_scheduler/task_tracker_unittest.cc
diff --git a/base/task_scheduler/task_tracker_unittest.cc b/base/task_scheduler/task_tracker_unittest.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fba478c9cfabc220d7b2864ddaf6c9e5b8413706
--- /dev/null
+++ b/base/task_scheduler/task_tracker_unittest.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,319 @@
+// Copyright 2016 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "base/task_scheduler/task_tracker.h"
+
+#include <queue>
+
+#include "base/bind.h"
+#include "base/logging.h"
+#include "base/macros.h"
+#include "base/memory/scoped_ptr.h"
+#include "base/synchronization/waitable_event.h"
+#include "base/task_scheduler/task.h"
+#include "base/task_scheduler/task_traits.h"
+#include "base/task_scheduler/test_utils.h"
+#include "base/threading/platform_thread.h"
+#include "base/threading/simple_thread.h"
+#include "testing/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h"
+
+namespace base {
+namespace internal {
+
+namespace {
+
+class ThreadCallingShutdown : public SimpleThread {
+ public:
+ explicit ThreadCallingShutdown(TaskTracker* tracker)
+ : SimpleThread("ThreadCallingShutdown"), tracker_(tracker) {}
+
+ // Returns true once the call to Shutdown() has returned.
+ bool has_returned() const { return has_returned_; }
+
+ private:
+ void Run() override {
+ tracker_->Shutdown();
+ has_returned_ = true;
+ }
+
+ TaskTracker* const tracker_;
+ bool has_returned_ = false;
+
+ DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(ThreadCallingShutdown);
+};
+
+class TaskSchedulerTaskTrackerTest
+ : public testing::TestWithParam<TaskShutdownBehavior> {
+ public:
+ TaskSchedulerTaskTrackerTest() = default;
+
+ void RunNextPostedTaskViaTracker() {
+ ASSERT_FALSE(posted_tasks_.empty());
+ tracker_.RunTask(posted_tasks_.front().get());
+ posted_tasks_.pop();
+ }
+
+ protected:
+ // Creates a task with |shutdown_behavior|.
+ scoped_ptr<Task> CreateTask(TaskShutdownBehavior shutdown_behavior) {
+ return make_scoped_ptr(new Task(
+ FROM_HERE,
+ Bind(&TaskSchedulerTaskTrackerTest::RunTaskCallback, Unretained(this)),
+ TaskTraits().WithShutdownBehavior(shutdown_behavior)));
+ }
+
+ // Tries to post |task| via |tracker_|. If |tracker_| approves the operation,
+ // |task| is added to |posted_tasks_|.
+ void PostTaskViaTracker(scoped_ptr<Task> task) {
+ tracker_.PostTask(
+ Bind(&TaskSchedulerTaskTrackerTest::PostTaskCallback, Unretained(this)),
+ std::move(task));
+ }
+
+ // Calls tracker_->Shutdown() on a new thread. When this returns, the
+ // Shutdown() method has been entered on the new thread, but it hasn't
+ // necessarily returned.
+ void CallShutdownAsync() {
+ DCHECK(!thread_calling_shutdown_.get());
+ thread_calling_shutdown_.reset(new ThreadCallingShutdown(&tracker_));
+ thread_calling_shutdown_->Start();
+ while (!tracker_.IsShuttingDownForTesting() &&
+ !tracker_.shutdown_completed()) {
+ PlatformThread::YieldCurrentThread();
+ }
+ }
+
+ void WaitForAsyncShutdownCompleted() {
+ DCHECK(thread_calling_shutdown_.get());
+ thread_calling_shutdown_->Join();
+ EXPECT_TRUE(thread_calling_shutdown_->has_returned());
+ EXPECT_TRUE(tracker_.shutdown_completed());
+ }
+
+ void VerifyAsyncShutdownInProgress() {
+ DCHECK(thread_calling_shutdown_.get());
+ EXPECT_FALSE(thread_calling_shutdown_->has_returned());
+ EXPECT_FALSE(tracker_.shutdown_completed());
+ EXPECT_TRUE(tracker_.IsShuttingDownForTesting());
+ }
+
+ TaskTracker tracker_;
+ size_t num_tasks_executed_ = 0;
+ std::queue<scoped_ptr<Task>> posted_tasks_;
+
+ private:
+ void PostTaskCallback(scoped_ptr<Task> task) {
+ posted_tasks_.push(std::move(task));
+ }
+
+ void RunTaskCallback() { ++num_tasks_executed_; }
+
+ scoped_ptr<ThreadCallingShutdown> thread_calling_shutdown_;
+
+ DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(TaskSchedulerTaskTrackerTest);
+};
+
+// A thread which calls
+// TaskSchedulerTaskTrackerTest::RunNextPostedTaskViaTracker() asynchronously.
+class ThreadRunningNextPostedTask : public SimpleThread {
+ public:
+ explicit ThreadRunningNextPostedTask(TaskSchedulerTaskTrackerTest* test)
+ : SimpleThread("ThreadRunningNextPostedTask"), test_(test) {}
+
+ private:
+ void Run() override { test_->RunNextPostedTaskViaTracker(); }
+
+ TaskSchedulerTaskTrackerTest* const test_;
+
+ DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(ThreadRunningNextPostedTask);
+};
+
+} // namespace
+
+TEST_P(TaskSchedulerTaskTrackerTest, PostAndRunBeforeShutdown) {
+ scoped_ptr<Task> task_to_post(CreateTask(GetParam()));
+ const Task* task_to_post_raw = task_to_post.get();
+
+ // Post the task.
+ EXPECT_TRUE(posted_tasks_.empty());
robliao 2016/03/17 23:34:21 This should probably be an ASSERT_TRUE and the nex
fdoray 2016/03/18 20:35:39 It is useful to continue running the test even if
+ PostTaskViaTracker(std::move(task_to_post));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1U, posted_tasks_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ(task_to_post_raw, posted_tasks_.front().get());
+
+ // Run the posted task.
+ EXPECT_EQ(0U, num_tasks_executed_);
+ RunNextPostedTaskViaTracker();
+ EXPECT_EQ(1U, num_tasks_executed_);
+
+ // Shutdown() shouldn't block.
+ tracker_.Shutdown();
+}
+
+TEST_P(TaskSchedulerTaskTrackerTest, PostAndRunLongTaskBeforeShutdown) {
+ // Post a task that will block until |event| is signaled.
+ EXPECT_TRUE(posted_tasks_.empty());
+ WaitableEvent event(false, false);
+ PostTaskViaTracker(make_scoped_ptr(
+ new Task(FROM_HERE, Bind(&WaitableEvent::Wait, Unretained(&event)),
+ TaskTraits().WithShutdownBehavior(GetParam()))));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1U, posted_tasks_.size());
+
+ // Run the task asynchronouly.
+ ThreadRunningNextPostedTask thread(this);
+ thread.Start();
+
+ // Initiate shutdown while the task is running.
+ CallShutdownAsync();
+
+ if (GetParam() == TaskShutdownBehavior::CONTINUE_ON_SHUTDOWN) {
+ // Shutdown should complete even with a CONTINUE_ON_SHUTDOWN in progress.
+ WaitForAsyncShutdownCompleted();
+ } else {
+ // Shutdown should block with any non CONTINUE_ON_SHUTDOWN task in progress.
+ VerifyAsyncShutdownInProgress();
+ }
+
+ // Unblock the task.
+ event.Signal();
+ thread.Join();
+
+ if (GetParam() != TaskShutdownBehavior::CONTINUE_ON_SHUTDOWN)
+ WaitForAsyncShutdownCompleted();
+}
+
+TEST_P(TaskSchedulerTaskTrackerTest, PostBeforeShutdownRunDuringShutdown) {
+ scoped_ptr<Task> task_to_post(CreateTask(GetParam()));
+ const Task* task_to_post_raw = task_to_post.get();
+
+ // Post the task.
+ EXPECT_TRUE(posted_tasks_.empty());
+ PostTaskViaTracker(std::move(task_to_post));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1U, posted_tasks_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ(task_to_post_raw, posted_tasks_.front().get());
+
+ // Post a BLOCK_SHUTDOWN task just to block shutdown.
+ PostTaskViaTracker(CreateTask(TaskShutdownBehavior::BLOCK_SHUTDOWN));
+
+ // Call Shutdown() asynchronously.
+ CallShutdownAsync();
+ VerifyAsyncShutdownInProgress();
+
+ // Try to run task posted at the beginning of this test. Only BLOCK_SHUTDOWN
+ // tasks should run, others should be discarded.
+ EXPECT_EQ(0U, num_tasks_executed_);
+ RunNextPostedTaskViaTracker();
+ EXPECT_EQ(GetParam() == TaskShutdownBehavior::BLOCK_SHUTDOWN ? 1U : 0U,
+ num_tasks_executed_);
+ VerifyAsyncShutdownInProgress();
+
+ // Unblock shutdown by running the remaining BLOCK_SHUTDOWN task.
+ RunNextPostedTaskViaTracker();
+ EXPECT_EQ(GetParam() == TaskShutdownBehavior::BLOCK_SHUTDOWN ? 2U : 1U,
+ num_tasks_executed_);
+ WaitForAsyncShutdownCompleted();
+}
+
+TEST_P(TaskSchedulerTaskTrackerTest, PostBeforeShutdownRunAfterShutdown) {
+ scoped_ptr<Task> task_to_post(CreateTask(GetParam()));
+ const Task* task_to_post_raw = task_to_post.get();
+
+ // Post the task.
+ EXPECT_TRUE(posted_tasks_.empty());
+ PostTaskViaTracker(std::move(task_to_post));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1U, posted_tasks_.size());
+ ASSERT_EQ(task_to_post_raw, posted_tasks_.front().get());
robliao 2016/03/17 23:34:21 Scrub the usages of ASSERT vs EXPECT as well. This
fdoray 2016/03/18 20:35:39 Done.
+
+ // Call Shutdown() asynchronously.
+ CallShutdownAsync();
+ EXPECT_EQ(0U, num_tasks_executed_);
+
+ if (GetParam() == TaskShutdownBehavior::BLOCK_SHUTDOWN) {
+ VerifyAsyncShutdownInProgress();
+
+ // Run the task to unblock shutdown.
+ RunNextPostedTaskViaTracker();
+ EXPECT_EQ(1U, num_tasks_executed_);
+ WaitForAsyncShutdownCompleted();
+
+ // It is not possible to test running after shutdown a BLOCK_SHUTDOWN task
gab 2016/03/18 18:48:17 I think posting a BLOCK_SHUTDOWN task after shutdo
fdoray 2016/03/18 20:35:39 Failure when a BLOCK_SHUTDOWN task is posted after
gab 2016/03/21 17:42:30 Ok thanks, see comment in product, not sure this i
fdoray 2016/03/21 19:08:07 I think it's BLOCK_SHUTDOWN only (see product). I
+ // that has been posted before shutdown because Shutdown() won't return if
+ // there are pending BLOCK_SHUTDOWN tasks.
+
+ // Make sure that a BLOCK_SHUTDOWN task doesn't run after shutdown (the
+ // task has never been posted).
+ EXPECT_DCHECK_DEATH(
+ {
+ tracker_.RunTask(
+ CreateTask(TaskShutdownBehavior::BLOCK_SHUTDOWN).get());
+ },
+ "");
+ } else {
+ WaitForAsyncShutdownCompleted();
+
+ // The task shouldn't be allowed to run after shutdown.
+ RunNextPostedTaskViaTracker();
+ EXPECT_EQ(0U, num_tasks_executed_);
+ }
+}
+
+TEST_P(TaskSchedulerTaskTrackerTest, PostAndRunDuringShutdown) {
+ // Post a BLOCK_SHUTDOWN task just to block shutdown.
+ PostTaskViaTracker(CreateTask(TaskShutdownBehavior::BLOCK_SHUTDOWN));
+ scoped_ptr<Task> block_shutdown_task = std::move(posted_tasks_.front());
+ posted_tasks_.pop();
+
+ // Call Shutdown() asynchronously.
+ CallShutdownAsync();
+ VerifyAsyncShutdownInProgress();
+
+ if (GetParam() == TaskShutdownBehavior::BLOCK_SHUTDOWN) {
+ // Post a task. This should succeed.
+ EXPECT_TRUE(posted_tasks_.empty());
+ PostTaskViaTracker(CreateTask(GetParam()));
+ EXPECT_EQ(1U, posted_tasks_.size());
+
+ // Run the task. This should succeed.
+ EXPECT_EQ(0U, num_tasks_executed_);
+ RunNextPostedTaskViaTracker();
+ EXPECT_EQ(1U, num_tasks_executed_);
+ } else {
+ // It shouldn't be possible to post a task which isn't BLOCK_SHUTDOWN.
+ PostTaskViaTracker(CreateTask(GetParam()));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(posted_tasks_.empty());
+
+ // Don't try to run the task, because it hasn't been posted successfully.
+ }
+
+ // Unblock shutdown by running the BLOCK_SHUTDOWN task posted at the beginning
+ // of the test.
+ VerifyAsyncShutdownInProgress();
+ tracker_.RunTask(block_shutdown_task.get());
+ EXPECT_EQ(GetParam() == TaskShutdownBehavior::BLOCK_SHUTDOWN ? 2U : 1U,
+ num_tasks_executed_);
+ WaitForAsyncShutdownCompleted();
+}
+
+TEST_P(TaskSchedulerTaskTrackerTest, PostAfterShutdown) {
+ // It is not possible to post a task after shutdown.
+ tracker_.Shutdown();
+ EXPECT_TRUE(posted_tasks_.empty());
+ PostTaskViaTracker(CreateTask(GetParam()));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(posted_tasks_.empty());
+}
+
+INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(
+ ContinueOnShutdown,
+ TaskSchedulerTaskTrackerTest,
+ ::testing::Values(TaskShutdownBehavior::CONTINUE_ON_SHUTDOWN));
+INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(
+ SkipOnShutdown,
+ TaskSchedulerTaskTrackerTest,
+ ::testing::Values(TaskShutdownBehavior::SKIP_ON_SHUTDOWN));
+INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(
+ BlockShutdown,
+ TaskSchedulerTaskTrackerTest,
+ ::testing::Values(TaskShutdownBehavior::BLOCK_SHUTDOWN));
+
+} // namespace internal
+} // namespace base

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698