Index: third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/imported/csswg-test/vendor-imports/mozilla/mozilla-central-reftests/flexbox/flexbox-sizing-horiz-001.xhtml |
diff --git a/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/imported/csswg-test/vendor-imports/mozilla/mozilla-central-reftests/flexbox/flexbox-sizing-horiz-001.xhtml b/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/imported/csswg-test/vendor-imports/mozilla/mozilla-central-reftests/flexbox/flexbox-sizing-horiz-001.xhtml |
new file mode 100644 |
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..85c54b4a72b0bc757bcea0738973cf0d32de510f |
--- /dev/null |
+++ b/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/imported/csswg-test/vendor-imports/mozilla/mozilla-central-reftests/flexbox/flexbox-sizing-horiz-001.xhtml |
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ |
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> |
+<!-- |
+ Any copyright is dedicated to the Public Domain. |
+ http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ |
+ --> |
+<!-- |
+ This testcase checks how "min-width" and "max-width" affect the sizing |
+ of horizontal flex containers that have no explicit "width" property. |
+ --> |
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> |
+ <head> |
+ <title>CSS Test: Testing sizing of an auto-sized horizontal flex container with min-width and max-width constraints</title> |
+ <link rel="author" title="Daniel Holbert" href="mailto:dholbert@mozilla.com"/> |
+ <link rel="help" href="http://www.w3.org/TR/css-flexbox-1/#layout-algorithm"/> |
+ <link rel="match" href="flexbox-sizing-horiz-001-ref.xhtml"/> |
+ <style> |
+ div { height: 10px; } |
+ div.flexbox { |
+ border: 1px dashed blue; |
+ font-size: 10px; |
+ display: flex; |
+ margin-bottom: 2px; |
+ } |
+ div.a { |
+ flex: 1 20px; |
+ max-width: 60px; |
+ background: lightgreen; |
+ } |
+ div.b { |
+ flex: 1 20px; |
+ min-width: 40px; |
+ max-width: 60px; |
+ background: purple; |
+ } |
+ div.c { |
+ flex: 1 40px; |
+ min-width: 10px; |
+ max-width: 60px; |
+ background: orange; |
+ } |
+ </style> |
+ </head> |
+ <body> |
+ <!-- auto-sized horizontal flexbox should occupy the available width. --> |
+ <div class="flexbox"> |
+ <div class="a"/><div class="b"/><div class="c"/> |
+ </div> |
+ |
+ <!-- Adding a small min-size shouldn't affect that. --> |
+ <div class="flexbox" style="min-width: 10px"> |
+ <div class="a"/><div class="b"/><div class="c"/> |
+ </div> |
+ |
+ <!-- ...but a (large) max-size will limit us to that size, instead of |
+ our available size. --> |
+ <div class="flexbox" style="max-width: 300px"> |
+ <div class="a"/><div class="b"/><div class="c"/> |
+ </div> |
+ |
+ <!-- If we set a maximum size that's even smaller, it'll limit our |
+ size and compress our children. --> |
+ <div class="flexbox" style="max-width: 70px"> |
+ <div class="a"/><div class="b"/><div class="c"/> |
+ </div> |
+ |
+ <!-- The max-size may be small enough that our items will overflow. --> |
+ <div class="flexbox" style="max-width: 20px"> |
+ <div class="a"/><div class="b"/><div class="c"/> |
+ </div> |
+ |
+ <!-- But if we add a min-size, it beats the max-size. Here, we use a |
+ min-size smaller than the sum of the items' base sizes... --> |
+ <div class="flexbox" style="min-width: 58px; max-width: 20px"> |
+ <div class="a"/><div class="b"/><div class="c"/> |
+ </div> |
+ |
+ <!-- ...and here we use a min-size larger than the sum of the items' |
+ base sizes. --> |
+ <div class="flexbox" style="min-width: 140px; max-width: 20px"> |
+ <div class="a"/><div class="b"/><div class="c"/> |
+ </div> |
+ |
+ </body> |
+</html> |