libfuzzer: Add pdfium XFA fuzzers

libfuzzer: Add pdfium XFA fuzzers

Also includes dicts. The XML dict is currently is a copy of the libxml
dict, which I suspect may not be very effective. It might still be
interesting just to get it running on CF before I build a better dict.

BUG=587126
R=aizatsky@chromium.org

Committed: https://crrev.com/2bc61daa5674521d2ed61713319b631e165a4c59
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#375744}

[Oliver Chang, 2016-02-17 00:24:16]

Description was changed from

==========
libfuzzer: Add pdfium XFA fuzzers

Also includes dicts. The XML dict is currently is a copy of the libxml
dict, which I suspect won't be very effective. It might still be
interesting just to get it running on CF before I build a better dict.

BUG=587126
R=aizatsky@chromium.org
==========

to

==========
libfuzzer: Add pdfium XFA fuzzers

Also includes dicts. The XML dict is currently is a copy of the libxml
dict, which I suspect may not be very effective. It might still be
interesting just to get it running on CF before I build a better dict.

BUG=587126
R=aizatsky@chromium.org
==========

[Oliver Chang, 2016-02-17 00:24:30]

ptal

[aizatsky, 2016-02-17 00:37:37]

lgtm

[Oliver Chang, 2016-02-17 00:40:06]

The CQ bit was checked by ochang@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-02-17 00:42:21]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1704653004/1
View timeline at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-timeline/1704653004/1

[Oliver Chang, 2016-02-17 00:49:05]

The CQ bit was unchecked by ochang@chromium.org

[Oliver Chang, 2016-02-17 00:52:49]

whoops. Mike, mind taking a quick look at PS#2?

[Oliver Chang, 2016-02-17 00:53:00]

The CQ bit was checked by ochang@chromium.org to run a CQ dry run

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-02-17 00:55:36]

Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1704653004/20001
View timeline at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-timeline/1704653004/20001

[aizatsky, 2016-02-17 00:59:13]

LGTM

But long term, is there a better place to put pdfium fuzzers into?

[Oliver Chang, 2016-02-17 01:04:03]

On 2016/02/17 00:59:13, aizatsky wrote:
> LGTM
> 
> But long term, is there a better place to put pdfium fuzzers into?

Thanks!

Hmm, a subdir in //pdf might be a good place in the long run. Lei, is that the
right place to have this?

[Oliver Chang, 2016-02-17 01:08:26]

The CQ bit was unchecked by ochang@chromium.org

[Oliver Chang, 2016-02-17 01:08:27]

The CQ bit was checked by ochang@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-02-17 01:11:00]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1704653004/20001
View timeline at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-timeline/1704653004/20001

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-02-17 01:42:41]

Description was changed from

==========
libfuzzer: Add pdfium XFA fuzzers

Also includes dicts. The XML dict is currently is a copy of the libxml
dict, which I suspect may not be very effective. It might still be
interesting just to get it running on CF before I build a better dict.

BUG=587126
R=aizatsky@chromium.org
==========

to

==========
libfuzzer: Add pdfium XFA fuzzers

Also includes dicts. The XML dict is currently is a copy of the libxml
dict, which I suspect may not be very effective. It might still be
interesting just to get it running on CF before I build a better dict.

BUG=587126
R=aizatsky@chromium.org
==========

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-02-17 01:42:42]

Committed patchset #2 (id:20001)

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-02-17 01:44:08]

Description was changed from

==========
libfuzzer: Add pdfium XFA fuzzers

Also includes dicts. The XML dict is currently is a copy of the libxml
dict, which I suspect may not be very effective. It might still be
interesting just to get it running on CF before I build a better dict.

BUG=587126
R=aizatsky@chromium.org
==========

to

==========
libfuzzer: Add pdfium XFA fuzzers

Also includes dicts. The XML dict is currently is a copy of the libxml
dict, which I suspect may not be very effective. It might still be
interesting just to get it running on CF before I build a better dict.

BUG=587126
R=aizatsky@chromium.org

Committed: https://crrev.com/2bc61daa5674521d2ed61713319b631e165a4c59
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#375744}
==========

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-02-17 01:44:09]

Patchset 2 (id:??) landed as
https://crrev.com/2bc61daa5674521d2ed61713319b631e165a4c59
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#375744}

[Lei Zhang, 2016-02-17 01:55:16]

On 2016/02/17 01:04:03, Oliver Chang wrote:
> On 2016/02/17 00:59:13, aizatsky wrote:
> > LGTM
> > 
> > But long term, is there a better place to put pdfium fuzzers into?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Hmm, a subdir in //pdf might be a good place in the long run. Lei, is that the
> right place to have this?

If you want to stick them in a directory like pdf/pdfium/fuzzer, I don't mind.