[SPDY] Fix SpdySession's handling of SYN_REPLY frames

net/spdy/spdy_network_transaction_unittest.cc

Index: net/spdy/spdy_network_transaction_unittest.cc
diff --git a/net/spdy/spdy_network_transaction_unittest.cc b/net/spdy/spdy_network_transaction_unittest.cc
index b418a3396bb332ae46b1e3fd0a5b1a841e54cee8..d7de25b9fc1815148bcd54293713150edecbb00c 100644
--- a/net/spdy/spdy_network_transaction_unittest.cc
+++ b/net/spdy/spdy_network_transaction_unittest.cc
@@ -2195,7 +2195,7 @@ TEST_P(SpdyNetworkTransactionTest, ResponseWithoutSynReply) {
                                      BoundNetLog(), GetParam(), NULL);
   helper.RunToCompletion(&data);
   TransactionHelperResult out = helper.output();
-  EXPECT_EQ(ERR_SYN_REPLY_NOT_RECEIVED, out.rv);
+  EXPECT_EQ(ERR_SPDY_PROTOCOL_ERROR, out.rv);
 }
 
 // Test that the transaction doesn't crash when we get two replies on the same
@@ -2206,7 +2206,12 @@ TEST_P(SpdyNetworkTransactionTest, ResponseWithTwoSynReplies) {
 
   scoped_ptr<SpdyFrame> req(
       spdy_util_.ConstructSpdyGet(NULL, 0, false, 1, LOWEST, true));
-  MockWrite writes[] = { CreateMockWrite(*req) };
+  scoped_ptr<SpdyFrame> rst(
+      spdy_util_.ConstructSpdyRstStream(1, RST_STREAM_STREAM_IN_USE));
+  MockWrite writes[] = {
+    CreateMockWrite(*req),
+    CreateMockWrite(*rst),
+  };
 
   scoped_ptr<SpdyFrame> resp(spdy_util_.ConstructSpdyGetSynReply(NULL, 0, 1));
   scoped_ptr<SpdyFrame> body(spdy_util_.ConstructSpdyBodyFrame(1, true));