Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(546)

Issue 1696093002: Support smart pointers in base::DispatchToMethod (Closed)

Created:
4 years, 10 months ago by tzik
Modified:
4 years, 10 months ago
Reviewers:
Nico, nhiroki
CC:
chromium-reviews, kinuko+fileapi, nhiroki, vmpstr+watch_chromium.org
Base URL:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Target Ref:
refs/pending/heads/master
Project:
chromium
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Support smart pointers in base::DispatchToMethod * Make base::DispatchToMethod to accept smart pointers as the this pointer * Remove base::internal::UnwrapTraits from //storage code BUG=554299 Committed: https://crrev.com/1ea87e3a0101b7860efe4bbec8f3c539a33facd9 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#375516}

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 3
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+6 lines, -8 lines) Patch
M base/tuple.h View 4 chunks +4 lines, -4 lines 3 comments Download
M storage/browser/fileapi/task_runner_bound_observer_list.h View 3 chunks +2 lines, -4 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 20 (9 generated)
commit-bot: I haz the power
Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1696093002/1 View timeline at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-timeline/1696093002/1
4 years, 10 months ago (2016-02-15 07:27:35 UTC) #5
tzik
PTAL
4 years, 10 months ago (2016-02-15 08:23:11 UTC) #7
nhiroki
lgtm
4 years, 10 months ago (2016-02-15 08:39:08 UTC) #8
commit-bot: I haz the power
Dry run: This issue passed the CQ dry run.
4 years, 10 months ago (2016-02-15 08:57:42 UTC) #10
Nico
https://codereview.chromium.org/1696093002/diff/1/base/tuple.h File base/tuple.h (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/1696093002/diff/1/base/tuple.h#newcode203 base/tuple.h:203: (obj->*method)(base::internal::UnwrapTraits<Ts>::Unwrap(get<Ns>(arg))...); Why doesn't this have to be (obj.*method) now? ...
4 years, 10 months ago (2016-02-15 15:22:34 UTC) #11
tzik
https://codereview.chromium.org/1696093002/diff/1/base/tuple.h File base/tuple.h (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/1696093002/diff/1/base/tuple.h#newcode203 base/tuple.h:203: (obj->*method)(base::internal::UnwrapTraits<Ts>::Unwrap(get<Ns>(arg))...); On 2016/02/15 15:22:34, Nico wrote: > Why doesn't ...
4 years, 10 months ago (2016-02-15 20:46:26 UTC) #12
Nico
I see. lgtm then. I think updating callers would be ever so slightly less confusing, ...
4 years, 10 months ago (2016-02-15 21:36:10 UTC) #13
tzik
On 2016/02/15 21:36:10, Nico wrote: > I see. lgtm then. I think updating callers would ...
4 years, 10 months ago (2016-02-16 04:51:37 UTC) #14
commit-bot: I haz the power
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1696093002/1 View timeline at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-timeline/1696093002/1
4 years, 10 months ago (2016-02-16 04:52:12 UTC) #16
commit-bot: I haz the power
Committed patchset #1 (id:1)
4 years, 10 months ago (2016-02-16 04:56:38 UTC) #18
commit-bot: I haz the power
4 years, 10 months ago (2016-02-16 22:51:24 UTC) #20
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Patchset 1 (id:??) landed as
https://crrev.com/1ea87e3a0101b7860efe4bbec8f3c539a33facd9
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#375516}

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698