Index: chrome/browser/chrome_browser_main.cc |
diff --git a/chrome/browser/chrome_browser_main.cc b/chrome/browser/chrome_browser_main.cc |
index 9d0d9dabddc1bbb7630714fc4ef4848fdfc89dae..9c975e31271993068ffdb00ac6095962fa7a8d3a 100644 |
--- a/chrome/browser/chrome_browser_main.cc |
+++ b/chrome/browser/chrome_browser_main.cc |
@@ -1391,20 +1391,8 @@ int ChromeBrowserMainParts::PreMainMessageLoopRunImpl() { |
browser_process_->intranet_redirect_detector(); |
GoogleSearchCounter::RegisterForNotifications(); |
- if (parsed_command_line().HasSwitch(switches::kEnableSdch)) { |
- // SDCH options via switches::kEnableSdch include: |
- const int kSdchDisabled = 0; |
- const int kSdchOverHttpEnabled = 1; |
- const int kSdchOverBothHttpAndHttpsEnabled = 2; |
- int sdch_enabled = kSdchOverHttpEnabled; |
- if (base::StringToInt(parsed_command_line().GetSwitchValueASCII( |
- switches::kEnableSdch), &sdch_enabled)) { |
- if (sdch_enabled == kSdchDisabled) { |
- net::SdchManager::EnableSdchSupport(false); |
mef
2014/02/24 21:41:37
Is it OK that if we remove this option, then there
willchan no longer on Chromium
2014/02/24 21:45:57
I assert yes, according to the policies laid out i
|
- } else if (sdch_enabled == kSdchOverBothHttpAndHttpsEnabled) { |
- net::SdchManager::EnableSecureSchemeSupport(true); |
- } |
- } |
+ if (parsed_command_line().HasSwitch(switches::kEnableSdchOverHttps)) { |
mef
2014/02/24 21:41:37
Would it make sense to replace command line switch
willchan no longer on Chromium
2014/02/24 21:45:57
I dunno. It's up to you :)
|
+ net::SdchManager::EnableSecureSchemeSupport(true); |
} |
if (parsed_command_line().HasSwitch(switches::kEnableWatchdog)) |