Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(113)

Unified Diff: src/core/SkDevice.cpp

Issue 1686203002: Skia Filter Quality and Scaling Metrics (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/skia.git@master
Patch Set: static + minor fixes Created 4 years, 10 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: src/core/SkDevice.cpp
diff --git a/src/core/SkDevice.cpp b/src/core/SkDevice.cpp
index 78aa3ee52f9bcbd2419cf69db5016b16ae1534c3..4d4470c048e5fa7f872db02cf1f984b8e434630b 100644
--- a/src/core/SkDevice.cpp
+++ b/src/core/SkDevice.cpp
@@ -442,3 +442,57 @@ uint32_t SkBaseDevice::filterTextFlags(const SkPaint& paint) const {
return flags;
}
+//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+
+void SkBaseDevice::LogDrawScaleFactor(const SkMatrix& matrix, SkFilterQuality filterQuality) {
+#if SK_HISTOGRAMS_ENABLED
+ enum ScaleFactor {
+ kUpscale_ScaleFactor,
+ kNoScale_ScaleFactor,
+ kDownscale_ScaleFactor,
+ kLargeDownscale_ScaleFactor,
+ };
+
+ SkASSERT(filterQuality != kNone_SkFilterQuality);
Ilya Sherman 2016/02/25 22:08:52 Why do you handle this case below, if you have thi
ericrk 2016/04/08 21:21:34 Didn't mean to have this. Removed.
+ enum { kScaleFactorCount = kLargeDownscale_ScaleFactor + 1 };
Ilya Sherman 2016/02/25 22:08:52 nit: Why not include this in the enum above?
ericrk 2016/04/08 21:21:34 Sure - style in Skia doesn't seem to put counts in
+ float rawScaleFactor = matrix.getMinScale();
+
+ ScaleFactor scaleFactor;
+ if (rawScaleFactor < 0.5f) {
+ scaleFactor = kLargeDownscale_ScaleFactor;
+ } else if (rawScaleFactor < 1.0f) {
+ scaleFactor = kDownscale_ScaleFactor;
+ } else if (rawScaleFactor > 1.0f) {
+ scaleFactor = kUpscale_ScaleFactor;
+ } else {
+ scaleFactor = kNoScale_ScaleFactor;
+ }
+
+ switch (filterQuality) {
+ case kNone_SkFilterQuality:
+ SK_HISTOGRAM_ENUMERATION("DrawScaleFactor.NoneFilterQuality", scaleFactor,
+ kScaleFactorCount);
+ break;
+ case kLow_SkFilterQuality:
+ SK_HISTOGRAM_ENUMERATION("DrawScaleFactor.LowFilterQuality", scaleFactor,
+ kScaleFactorCount);
+ break;
+ case kMedium_SkFilterQuality:
+ SK_HISTOGRAM_ENUMERATION("DrawScaleFactor.MediumFilterQuality", scaleFactor,
+ kScaleFactorCount);
+ break;
+ case kHigh_SkFilterQuality:
+ SK_HISTOGRAM_ENUMERATION("DrawScaleFactor.HighFilterQuality", scaleFactor,
+ kScaleFactorCount);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ // Also log filter quality independent scale factor.
+ SK_HISTOGRAM_ENUMERATION("DrawScaleFactor.AnyFilterQuality", scaleFactor, kScaleFactorCount);
+
+ // Also log an overall histogram of filter quality.
+ enum { kFilterQualityCount = kHigh_SkFilterQuality + 1 };
Ilya Sherman 2016/02/25 22:08:52 This worries me a bit -- if the filter quality enu
ericrk 2016/04/08 21:21:34 added a kLast_SkFilterQuality and used this instea
+ SK_HISTOGRAM_ENUMERATION("FilterQuality", filterQuality, kFilterQualityCount);
+#endif
+}
+

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698