Issue 16836015: Rebaseline bindings test results after r152270

Issue 16836015: Rebaseline bindings test results after r152270 (Closed)

Created:
7 years, 6 months ago by do-not-use

Modified:
7 years, 6 months ago

Reviewers:
haraken, abarth-chromium

CC:
blink-reviews, jsbell+bindings_chromium.org, eae+blinkwatch, abarth-chromium, marja+watch_chromium.org, adamk+blink_chromium.org, Nate Chapin, lgombos

Base URL:
svn://svn.chromium.org/blink/trunk

Visibility:
Public.

More Reviews

Description

Rebaseline bindings test results after r152270 NOTRY=true Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/blink?view=rev&revision=152350

Patch Set 1 #

Created: 7 years, 6 months ago

Download [raw] [tar.bz2]

	Unified diffs	Side-by-side diffs	Stats (+80 lines, -74 lines)			Patch
M	Source/bindings/tests/results/V8Float64Array.h	View	1 chunk	+2 lines, -2 lines	0 comments	Download
M	Source/bindings/tests/results/V8TestCustomAccessors.h	View	1 chunk	+8 lines, -8 lines	0 comments	Download
M	Source/bindings/tests/results/V8TestEventTarget.h	View	1 chunk	+7 lines, -7 lines	0 comments	Download
M	Source/bindings/tests/results/V8TestEventTarget.cpp	View	2 chunks	+25 lines, -25 lines	0 comments	Download
M	Source/bindings/tests/results/V8TestInterface.h	View	1 chunk	+4 lines, -4 lines	0 comments	Download
M	Source/bindings/tests/results/V8TestInterface.cpp	View	3 chunks	+18 lines, -12 lines	0 comments	Download
M	Source/bindings/tests/results/V8TestObject.h	View	1 chunk	+4 lines, -4 lines	0 comments	Download
M	Source/bindings/tests/results/V8TestObject.cpp	View	2 chunks	+12 lines, -12 lines	0 comments	Download

Messages

Total messages: 6 (0 generated)

Expand Messages | Collapse Messages

commit-bot: I haz the power

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/ch.dumez@sisa.samsung.com/16836015/1

7 years, 6 months ago (2013-06-13 12:18:37 UTC) #3

Stephen White

Nit: this looks like a code change, not a rebaseline. If so, it probably shouldn't ...

7 years, 6 months ago (2013-06-13 14:28:51 UTC) #5

Stephen White

7 years, 6 months ago (2013-06-13 14:30:13 UTC) #6

Message was sent while issue was closed.

On 2013/06/13 14:28:51, Stephen White wrote:
> Nit: this looks like a code change, not a rebaseline. If so, it probably
> shouldn't have landed with NOTRY=true.

Never mind; I see now that the code changes are in bindings/tests.

Expand Messages | Collapse Messages