Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(256)

Unified Diff: net/base/network_quality_estimator_unittest.cc

Issue 1672513002: Expose packet loss counts from QUIC to NetworkQualityEstimator (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: Created 4 years, 10 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: net/base/network_quality_estimator_unittest.cc
diff --git a/net/base/network_quality_estimator_unittest.cc b/net/base/network_quality_estimator_unittest.cc
index 25e386db44db573184f628053115c75be6ea87e5..8b0003f5862d77dc459c0ce3c0694137685a4408 100644
--- a/net/base/network_quality_estimator_unittest.cc
+++ b/net/base/network_quality_estimator_unittest.cc
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
#include "net/base/external_estimate_provider.h"
#include "net/base/load_flags.h"
#include "net/base/network_change_notifier.h"
+#include "net/base/socket_performance_watcher_factory.h"
#include "net/http/http_status_code.h"
#include "net/test/embedded_test_server/embedded_test_server.h"
#include "net/test/embedded_test_server/http_request.h"
@@ -157,6 +158,45 @@ class TestThroughputObserver
std::vector<Observation> observations_;
};
+class TestPacketLossObserver
+ : public net::NetworkQualityEstimator::PacketLossObserver {
+ public:
+ struct Observation {
+ Observation(uint64_t num_packets_lost,
+ uint64_t num_packets_received_in_order,
+ uint64_t num_packets_received_not_in_order,
+ const base::TimeTicks& ts,
+ net::NetworkQualityEstimator::ObservationSource src)
+ : num_packets_lost(num_packets_lost),
+ num_packets_received_in_order(num_packets_received_in_order),
+ num_packets_received_not_in_order(num_packets_received_not_in_order),
+ timestamp(ts),
+ source(src) {}
+ uint64_t num_packets_lost;
+ uint64_t num_packets_received_in_order;
+ uint64_t num_packets_received_not_in_order;
+ base::TimeTicks timestamp;
+ net::NetworkQualityEstimator::ObservationSource source;
+ };
+
+ std::vector<Observation>& observations() { return observations_; }
+
+ // PacketLossObserver implementation:
+ void OnPacketLossObservation(
+ uint64_t num_packets_lost,
+ uint64_t num_packets_received_in_order,
+ uint64_t num_packets_received_not_in_order,
+ const base::TimeTicks& timestamp,
+ net::NetworkQualityEstimator::ObservationSource source) override {
+ observations_.push_back(
+ Observation(num_packets_lost, num_packets_received_in_order,
+ num_packets_received_not_in_order, timestamp, source));
+ }
+
+ private:
+ std::vector<Observation> observations_;
+};
+
} // namespace
namespace net {
@@ -255,6 +295,64 @@ TEST(NetworkQualityEstimatorTest, TestKbpsRTTUpdates) {
EXPECT_FALSE(estimator.GetDownlinkThroughputKbpsEstimate(&kbps));
}
+// Tests that packet loss rate is updated correctly.
+TEST(NetworkQualityEstimatorTest, TestPacketLossRateUpdates) {
+ base::HistogramTester histogram_tester;
+ std::map<std::string, std::string> variation_params;
+ TestNetworkQualityEstimator estimator(variation_params);
+ histogram_tester.ExpectTotalCount("NQE.PacketLossRate.Unknown", 0);
+
+ float packet_loss_rate = NetworkQualityEstimator::kInvalidPacketLossRate;
+ EXPECT_FALSE(estimator.GetPacketLossRateEstimate(&packet_loss_rate));
+
+ estimator.OnUpdatedPacketCountAvailable(
+ NetworkQualityEstimator::PROTOCOL_QUIC, 0, 1, 1);
+
+ EXPECT_TRUE(estimator.GetPacketLossRateEstimate(&packet_loss_rate));
+ EXPECT_NEAR(0.0, packet_loss_rate, 0.001);
+
+ // Check UMA histograms.
+ estimator.SimulateNetworkChangeTo(
+ NetworkChangeNotifier::ConnectionType::CONNECTION_WIFI, std::string());
+ histogram_tester.ExpectTotalCount("NQE.PacketLossRate.Unknown", 1);
+
+ EXPECT_FALSE(estimator.GetPacketLossRateEstimate(&packet_loss_rate));
+
+ // Expecting packet number p, but received packet number p+9. 1 out of 10
+ // packets were received.
+ estimator.OnUpdatedPacketCountAvailable(
+ NetworkQualityEstimator::PROTOCOL_QUIC, 9, 1, 0);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(estimator.GetPacketLossRateEstimate(&packet_loss_rate));
+ EXPECT_NEAR(9.0 / 10, packet_loss_rate, 0.001);
+
+ // Expecting packet number p+10, and received packet number p+10. Now, 2 out
+ // of 11 packets were received.
+ estimator.OnUpdatedPacketCountAvailable(
+ NetworkQualityEstimator::PROTOCOL_QUIC, 0, 1, 0);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(estimator.GetPacketLossRateEstimate(&packet_loss_rate));
+ EXPECT_NEAR(9.0 / 11, packet_loss_rate, 0.001);
+
+ // Expecting packet number p+11, and received packet number p+11. Now, 3 out
+ // of 12 packets were received.
+ estimator.OnUpdatedPacketCountAvailable(
+ NetworkQualityEstimator::PROTOCOL_QUIC, 0, 1, 0);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(estimator.GetPacketLossRateEstimate(&packet_loss_rate));
+ EXPECT_NEAR(9.0 / 12, packet_loss_rate, 0.001);
+
+ // Expecting packet number p+12, but received packet number p. Still, 3 out of
+ // 12 packets were received.
+ estimator.OnUpdatedPacketCountAvailable(
+ NetworkQualityEstimator::PROTOCOL_QUIC, 0, 0, 1);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(estimator.GetPacketLossRateEstimate(&packet_loss_rate));
+ EXPECT_NEAR(9.0 / 12, packet_loss_rate, 0.001);
+
+ estimator.SimulateNetworkChangeTo(
+ NetworkChangeNotifier::ConnectionType::CONNECTION_WIFI, std::string());
+ histogram_tester.ExpectTotalCount("NQE.PacketLossRate.WiFi", 1);
+
+ EXPECT_FALSE(estimator.GetPacketLossRateEstimate(&packet_loss_rate));
+}
+
TEST(NetworkQualityEstimatorTest, StoreObservations) {
std::map<std::string, std::string> variation_params;
TestNetworkQualityEstimator estimator(variation_params);
@@ -299,6 +397,8 @@ TEST(NetworkQualityEstimatorTest, PercentileSameTimestamps) {
EXPECT_FALSE(estimator.GetRTTEstimate(&rtt));
int32_t kbps;
EXPECT_FALSE(estimator.GetDownlinkThroughputKbpsEstimate(&kbps));
+ float packet_loss_rate = NetworkQualityEstimator::kInvalidPacketLossRate;
+ EXPECT_FALSE(estimator.GetPacketLossRateEstimate(&packet_loss_rate));
// Insert samples from {1,2,3,..., 100}. First insert odd samples, then even
// samples. This helps in verifying that the order of samples does not matter.
@@ -310,8 +410,12 @@ TEST(NetworkQualityEstimatorTest, PercentileSameTimestamps) {
NetworkQualityEstimator::RttObservation(
base::TimeDelta::FromMilliseconds(i), now,
NetworkQualityEstimator::URL_REQUEST));
+ estimator.packet_loss_rate_observations_.AddObservation(
+ NetworkQualityEstimator::PacketLossObservation(
+ 0.0, now, NetworkQualityEstimator::QUIC));
EXPECT_TRUE(estimator.GetRTTEstimate(&rtt));
EXPECT_TRUE(estimator.GetDownlinkThroughputKbpsEstimate(&kbps));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(estimator.GetPacketLossRateEstimate(&packet_loss_rate));
}
for (int i = 2; i <= 100; i += 2) {
@@ -322,8 +426,12 @@ TEST(NetworkQualityEstimatorTest, PercentileSameTimestamps) {
NetworkQualityEstimator::RttObservation(
base::TimeDelta::FromMilliseconds(i), now,
NetworkQualityEstimator::URL_REQUEST));
+ estimator.packet_loss_rate_observations_.AddObservation(
+ NetworkQualityEstimator::PacketLossObservation(
+ 1.0, now, NetworkQualityEstimator::QUIC));
EXPECT_TRUE(estimator.GetRTTEstimate(&rtt));
EXPECT_TRUE(estimator.GetDownlinkThroughputKbpsEstimate(&kbps));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(estimator.GetPacketLossRateEstimate(&packet_loss_rate));
}
for (int i = 0; i <= 100; ++i) {
@@ -346,6 +454,8 @@ TEST(NetworkQualityEstimatorTest, PercentileSameTimestamps) {
base::TimeTicks(), 50) > 0);
EXPECT_TRUE(estimator.GetRTTEstimateInternal(base::TimeTicks(), 50) !=
NetworkQualityEstimator::InvalidRTT());
+ EXPECT_TRUE(estimator.GetPacketLossRateEstimate(&packet_loss_rate));
+ EXPECT_NEAR(0.5, packet_loss_rate, 0.001);
}
// Verifies that the percentiles are correctly computed. Observations have
@@ -359,6 +469,9 @@ TEST(NetworkQualityEstimatorTest, PercentileDifferentTimestamps) {
base::TimeTicks now = base::TimeTicks::Now();
base::TimeTicks very_old = base::TimeTicks::UnixEpoch();
+ float packet_loss_rate = NetworkQualityEstimator::kInvalidPacketLossRate;
+ EXPECT_FALSE(estimator.GetPacketLossRateEstimate(&packet_loss_rate));
+
// First 50 samples have very old timestamp.
for (int i = 1; i <= 50; ++i) {
estimator.downstream_throughput_kbps_observations_.AddObservation(
@@ -368,6 +481,9 @@ TEST(NetworkQualityEstimatorTest, PercentileDifferentTimestamps) {
NetworkQualityEstimator::RttObservation(
base::TimeDelta::FromMilliseconds(i), very_old,
NetworkQualityEstimator::URL_REQUEST));
+ estimator.packet_loss_rate_observations_.AddObservation(
+ NetworkQualityEstimator::PacketLossObservation(
+ 0.0, very_old, NetworkQualityEstimator::QUIC));
}
// Next 50 (i.e., from 51 to 100) have recent timestamp.
@@ -379,6 +495,9 @@ TEST(NetworkQualityEstimatorTest, PercentileDifferentTimestamps) {
NetworkQualityEstimator::RttObservation(
base::TimeDelta::FromMilliseconds(i), now,
NetworkQualityEstimator::URL_REQUEST));
+ estimator.packet_loss_rate_observations_.AddObservation(
+ NetworkQualityEstimator::PacketLossObservation(
+ 1.0, now, NetworkQualityEstimator::QUIC));
}
// Older samples have very little weight. So, all percentiles are >= 51
@@ -402,6 +521,9 @@ TEST(NetworkQualityEstimatorTest, PercentileDifferentTimestamps) {
EXPECT_EQ(NetworkQualityEstimator::kInvalidThroughput,
estimator.GetDownlinkThroughputKbpsEstimateInternal(
base::TimeTicks::Now() + base::TimeDelta::FromMinutes(10), 50));
+
+ EXPECT_TRUE(estimator.GetPacketLossRateEstimate(&packet_loss_rate));
+ EXPECT_NEAR(1.0, packet_loss_rate, 0.001);
}
// This test notifies NetworkQualityEstimator of received data. Next,
@@ -1026,10 +1148,12 @@ TEST(NetworkQualityEstimatorTest, TestExternalEstimateProviderMergeEstimates) {
TEST(NetworkQualityEstimatorTest, TestObservers) {
TestRTTObserver rtt_observer;
TestThroughputObserver throughput_observer;
+ TestPacketLossObserver packet_loss_observer;
std::map<std::string, std::string> variation_params;
TestNetworkQualityEstimator estimator(variation_params);
estimator.AddRTTObserver(&rtt_observer);
estimator.AddThroughputObserver(&throughput_observer);
+ estimator.AddPacketLossObserver(&packet_loss_observer);
TestDelegate test_delegate;
TestURLRequestContext context(true);
@@ -1052,6 +1176,14 @@ TEST(NetworkQualityEstimatorTest, TestObservers) {
request2->Start();
base::RunLoop().Run();
+ float packet_loss_rate = NetworkQualityEstimator::kInvalidPacketLossRate;
+ EXPECT_FALSE(estimator.GetPacketLossRateEstimate(&packet_loss_rate));
+
+ estimator.OnUpdatedPacketCountAvailable(
+ NetworkQualityEstimator::PROTOCOL_QUIC, 0, 1, 1);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(estimator.GetPacketLossRateEstimate(&packet_loss_rate));
+ EXPECT_NEAR(0.0, packet_loss_rate, 0.001);
+
// Both RTT and downstream throughput should be updated.
EXPECT_NE(NetworkQualityEstimator::InvalidRTT(),
estimator.GetRTTEstimateInternal(base::TimeTicks(), 100));
@@ -1061,6 +1193,7 @@ TEST(NetworkQualityEstimatorTest, TestObservers) {
EXPECT_EQ(2U, rtt_observer.observations().size());
EXPECT_EQ(2U, throughput_observer.observations().size());
+ ASSERT_EQ(1U, packet_loss_observer.observations().size());
for (auto observation : rtt_observer.observations()) {
EXPECT_LE(0, observation.rtt_ms);
EXPECT_LE(0, (observation.timestamp - then).InMilliseconds());
@@ -1071,6 +1204,13 @@ TEST(NetworkQualityEstimatorTest, TestObservers) {
EXPECT_LE(0, (observation.timestamp - then).InMilliseconds());
EXPECT_EQ(NetworkQualityEstimator::URL_REQUEST, observation.source);
}
+ for (auto observation : packet_loss_observer.observations()) {
+ EXPECT_LE(0u, observation.num_packets_lost);
+ EXPECT_LE(1u, observation.num_packets_received_in_order);
+ EXPECT_LE(0u, observation.num_packets_received_not_in_order);
+ EXPECT_LE(0, (observation.timestamp - then).InMilliseconds());
+ EXPECT_EQ(NetworkQualityEstimator::QUIC, observation.source);
+ }
// Verify that observations from TCP and QUIC are passed on to the observers.
base::TimeDelta tcp_rtt(base::TimeDelta::FromMilliseconds(1));

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698