Revert 198272 "cc: Move canvas clear from picture to picture_pil..."

Revert 198272 "cc: Move canvas clear from picture to picture_pil..."

> cc: Move canvas clear from picture to picture_pile_impl
> 
> This moves a clear per picture into a clear-to-background color
> per picture pile. We need this to ensure that a solid color
> page in low res is considered solid, since all the draws are
> of the same color.
> 
> BUG=233622
> 
> Review URL: https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/14322017

TBR=vmpstr@chromium.org

Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=205298

[trchen, 2013-06-10 20:46:09]

Committed patchset #1 manually as r205298.

[tomhudson, 2013-06-10 20:47:36]

Why the revert?

[trchen, 2013-06-10 20:50:18]

On 2013/06/10 20:47:36, tomhudson wrote:
> Why the revert?

https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=245349
Note: The patch was already reverted on trunk. This is for M28.

[trchen, 2013-06-10 20:59:26]

On 2013/06/10 20:50:18, trchen wrote:
> On 2013/06/10 20:47:36, tomhudson wrote:
> > Why the revert?
> 
> https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=245349
> Note: The patch was already reverted on trunk. This is for M28.

Wait, I just realized the "revert" patch on trunk is not a trivial revert.
Should I re-apply r198272 then cherry-pick r198826 instead?

[trchen, 2013-06-10 21:05:20]

On 2013/06/10 20:59:26, trchen wrote:
> On 2013/06/10 20:50:18, trchen wrote:
> > On 2013/06/10 20:47:36, tomhudson wrote:
> > > Why the revert?
> > 
> > https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=245349
> > Note: The patch was already reverted on trunk. This is for M28.
> 
> Wait, I just realized the "revert" patch on trunk is not a trivial revert.
> Should I re-apply r198272 then cherry-pick r198826 instead?

Oh please ignore my previous comment. It is a trivial revert reusing the same
code review issue#.

[vmpstr, 2013-06-10 21:06:39]

On 2013/06/10 21:05:20, trchen wrote:
> On 2013/06/10 20:59:26, trchen wrote:
> > On 2013/06/10 20:50:18, trchen wrote:
> > > On 2013/06/10 20:47:36, tomhudson wrote:
> > > > Why the revert?
> > > 
> > > https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=245349
> > > Note: The patch was already reverted on trunk. This is for M28.
> > 
> > Wait, I just realized the "revert" patch on trunk is not a trivial revert.
> > Should I re-apply r198272 then cherry-pick r198826 instead?
> 
> Oh please ignore my previous comment. It is a trivial revert reusing the same
> code review issue#.

Oops. I'll know better in the future.