Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(1)

Issues Search
    My Issues | Starred     Open | Closed | All

Unified Diff: third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/imported/web-platform-tests/shadow-dom/styles/shadow-cascade-order.html

Issue 1666363003: Import web-platform-tests@27e3d93f88a71a249d1df872a5d613b3243b9588 (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: Missed win failiure in TestExpectations Created 4 years, 10 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/imported/web-platform-tests/screen-orientation/resources/sandboxed-iframe-locking.html ('k') | third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/imported/web-platform-tests/shadow-dom/styles/shadow-cascade-order-expected.txt » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/imported/web-platform-tests/shadow-dom/styles/shadow-cascade-order.html
diff --git a/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/imported/web-platform-tests/shadow-dom/styles/shadow-cascade-order.html b/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/imported/web-platform-tests/shadow-dom/styles/shadow-cascade-order.html
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..851509745cb1e12e291fcc1be57e8ccb34b572f5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/imported/web-platform-tests/shadow-dom/styles/shadow-cascade-order.html
@@ -0,0 +1,404 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html>
+<html>
+<head>
+<title>Shadow DOM: CSS Style Rule cascading</title>
+<meta name="author" title="Takayoshi Kochi" href="mailto:kochi@google.com">
+<meta name="assert" content="Cascading order test for style rules from various shadow trees.">
+<link rel="help" href="https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/blob/gh-pages/proposals/Shadow-DOM-Cascade-Order.md">
+<script src="../../../../resources/testharness.js"></script>
+<script src="../../../../resources/testharnessreport.js"></script>
+<link rel='stylesheet' href='../../../../resources/testharness.css'>
+</head>
+<body>
+<div id="log"></div>
+<script>
+
+// Taken from the example in
+// https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/blob/gh-pages/proposals/Shadow-DOM-Cascade-Order.md
+// https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/316
+// https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/blob/gh-pages/proposals/Shadow-DOM-Cascade-Order-in-v1.md
+// with element renamed and style rule location changed.
+//
+// <style>my-item { color: red; }</style>
+// <my-list>
+// <:shadow>
+// <style>::slotted(my-item) { color: blue; }</style>
+// <slot/>
+// </:shadow>
+// <my-item style="color: green;">
+// <:shadow>
+// <style>:host { color: yellow; }</style>
+// <slot/>
+// </:shadow>
+// ITEM
+// </my-item>
+// </my-list>
+//
+// There are 4 possible style rules that applies to <my-item> above:
+// 1. document-wide style
+// 2. ::slotted style in the shadow in <my-list>
+// 3. :host style in the shadow in <my-item>
+// 4. inline style within <my-item> itself.
+//
+// It could be possible to nest many more shadow trees in <my-list>,
+// but to prevent the number of combination explosion, such case is covered
+// in another test file.
+//
+// So testing cases where 2 style rules are competing,
+// 4C2 = 6 combinations exist, multiplied by 4, which is the possible
+// combination of applying "!important" for the 2 style rules.
+
+function createMyList(mode, slottedStyle, hostStyle, inlineStyle) {
+ var myList = document.createElement('my-list');
+ var root = myList.attachShadow({'mode': mode});
+ root.innerHTML = '<style>' + slottedStyle + '</style><slot></slot>';
+ var myItem = document.createElement('my-item');
+ if (inlineStyle !== '')
+ myItem.setAttribute('style', inlineStyle);
+ myList.appendChild(myItem);
+ var root2 = myItem.attachShadow({'mode': mode});
+ root2.innerHTML = '<style>' + hostStyle + '</style><slot></slot>';
+ myItem.appendChild(document.createTextNode('ITEM'));
+ return myList;
+}
+
+function testCascadingOrder(mode) {
+ // In all test cases, the rule specified as "color: green" should win.
+ var testCases = [
+ // [A] Cases between document, ::slotteed, :host, and inline
+ {
+ title: 'A1. document vs ::slotted, document rule should win',
+ documentStyle: 'my-item { color: green; }',
+ slottedStyle: '::slotted(my-item) { color: red; }',
+ hostStyle: '',
+ inlineStyle: ''
+ },
+ {
+ title: 'A2. document vs :host, document rule should win',
+ documentStyle: 'my-item { color: green; }',
+ slottedStyle: '',
+ hostStyle: ':host { color: red; }',
+ inlineStyle: ''
+ },
+ {
+ title: 'A3. document vs inline, inline rule should win',
+ documentStyle: 'my-item { color: red; }',
+ slottedStyle: '',
+ hostStyle: '',
+ inlineStyle: 'color: green;'
+ },
+ {
+ title: 'A4. ::slotted vs :host, earlier in tree-of-trees rule should win',
+ documentStyle: '',
+ slottedStyle: '::slotted(my-item) { color: green; }',
+ hostStyle: ':host { color: red; }',
+ inlineStyle: ''
+ },
+ {
+ title: 'A5. ::slotted vs inline, inline rule should win',
+ documentStyle: '',
+ slottedStyle: '::slotted(my-item) { color: red; }',
+ hostStyle: '',
+ inlineStyle: 'color: green;'
+ },
+ {
+ title: 'A6. :host vs inline, inline rule should win',
+ documentStyle: '',
+ slottedStyle: '',
+ hostStyle: ':host { color: red; }',
+ inlineStyle: 'color: green;'
+ },
+
+ // [B] Stronger rule is still stronger with !important
+ {
+ title: 'B1. document with !important vs ::slotted, document rule should win',
+ documentStyle: 'my-item { color: green !important; }',
+ slottedStyle: '::slotted(my-item) { color: red; }',
+ hostStyle: '',
+ inlineStyle: ''
+ },
+ {
+ title: 'B2. document with !important vs :host, document rule should win',
+ documentStyle: 'my-item { color: green !important; }',
+ slottedStyle: '',
+ hostStyle: ':host { color: red; }',
+ inlineStyle: ''
+ },
+ {
+ title: 'B3. document vs inline with !important, inline rule should win',
+ documentStyle: 'my-item { color: red; }',
+ slottedStyle: '',
+ hostStyle: '',
+ inlineStyle: 'color: green !important;'
+ },
+ {
+ title: 'B4. ::slotted with !important vs :host, earlier in tree-of-trees rule should win',
+ documentStyle: '',
+ slottedStyle: '::slotted(my-item) { color: green !important; }',
+ hostStyle: ':host { color: red; }',
+ inlineStyle: ''
+ },
+ {
+ title: 'B5. ::slotted vs inline with !important, inline rule should win',
+ documentStyle: '',
+ slottedStyle: '::slotted(my-item) { color: green !important; }',
+ hostStyle: '',
+ inlineStyle: 'color: red;'
+ },
+ {
+ title: 'B6. :host vs inline with !important, inline rule should win',
+ documentStyle: '',
+ slottedStyle: '',
+ hostStyle: ':host { color: red; }',
+ inlineStyle: 'color: green !important;'
+ },
+
+ // [C] Weaker rule gets stronger with !important
+ {
+ title: 'C1. document vs ::slotted with !important, ::slotted rule should win',
+ documentStyle: 'my-item { color: red; }',
+ slottedStyle: '::slotted(my-item) { color: green !important; }',
+ hostStyle: '',
+ inlineStyle: ''
+ },
+ {
+ title: 'C2. document vs :host with !important, :host rule should win',
+ documentStyle: 'my-item { color: red; }',
+ slottedStyle: '',
+ hostStyle: ':host { color: green !important; }',
+ inlineStyle: ''
+ },
+ {
+ title: 'C3. document with !important vs inline, document rule should win',
+ documentStyle: 'my-item { color: green !important; }',
+ slottedStyle: '',
+ hostStyle: '',
+ inlineStyle: 'color: red;'
+ },
+ {
+ title: 'C4. ::slotted vs :host with !important, later in tree-of-trees rule should win',
+ documentStyle: '',
+ slottedStyle: '::slotted(my-item) { color: green !important; }',
+ hostStyle: ':host { color: red; }',
+ inlineStyle: ''
+ },
+ {
+ title: 'C5. ::slotted with !important vs inline, ::slotted rule should win',
+ documentStyle: '',
+ slottedStyle: '::slotted(my-item) { color: green !important; }',
+ hostStyle: '',
+ inlineStyle: 'color: red;'
+ },
+ {
+ title: 'C6. :host with !important vs inline, :host rule should win',
+ documentStyle: '',
+ slottedStyle: '',
+ hostStyle: ':host { color: green !important; }',
+ inlineStyle: 'color: red;'
+ },
+
+ // [D] Cases between document, ::slotteed, :host, and inline, both with !important
+ {
+ title: 'D1. document vs ::slotted both with !important, ::slotted rule should win',
+ documentStyle: 'my-item { color: red !important; }',
+ slottedStyle: '::slotted(my-item) { color: green !important; }',
+ hostStyle: '',
+ inlineStyle: ''
+ },
+ {
+ title: 'D2. document vs :host both with !important, :host rule should win',
+ documentStyle: 'my-item { color: red !important; }',
+ slottedStyle: '',
+ hostStyle: ':host { color: green !important; }',
+ inlineStyle: ''
+ },
+ {
+ title: 'D3. document vs inline both with !important, inline rule should win',
+ documentStyle: 'my-item { color: red !important; }',
+ slottedStyle: '',
+ hostStyle: '',
+ inlineStyle: 'color: green !important;'
+ },
+ {
+ title: 'D4. ::slotted vs :host both with !important, later in tree-of-trees rule should win',
+ documentStyle: '',
+ slottedStyle: '::slotted(my-item) { color: red !important; }',
+ hostStyle: ':host { color: green !important; }',
+ inlineStyle: ''
+ },
+ {
+ title: 'D5. ::slotted vs inline both with !important, ::slotted rule should win',
+ documentStyle: '',
+ slottedStyle: '::slotted(my-item) { color: green !important; }',
+ hostStyle: '',
+ inlineStyle: 'color: red !important;'
+ },
+ {
+ title: 'D6. :host vs inline both with !important, :host rule should win',
+ documentStyle: '',
+ slottedStyle: '',
+ hostStyle: ':host { color: green !important; }',
+ inlineStyle: 'color: red !important;'
+ },
+ // [E] Putting all together
+ {
+ title: 'E1. all style applied, inline rule should win',
+ documentStyle: 'my-item { color: red; }',
+ slottedStyle: '::slotted(my-item) { color: blue; }',
+ hostStyle: ':host { color: yellow; }',
+ inlineStyle: 'color: green;'
+ },
+ {
+ title: 'E2. all styles with !important applied, rule in the last tree-of-trees should win',
+ documentStyle: 'my-item { color: red !important; }',
+ slottedStyle: '::slotted(my-item) { color: blue !important; }',
+ hostStyle: ':host { color: green !important; }',
+ inlineStyle: 'color: yellow !important;'
+ },
+ ];
+
+ for (var i = 0; i < testCases.length; ++i) {
+ var testCase = testCases[i];
+ var documentStyle = document.createElement('style');
+ documentStyle.appendChild(document.createTextNode(testCase['documentStyle']));
+ document.head.appendChild(documentStyle);
+
+ var myList = createMyList(mode,
+ testCase['slottedStyle'], testCase['hostStyle'], testCase['inlineStyle']);
+ document.body.appendChild(myList);
+
+ test(function () {
+ var myItem = myList.querySelector('my-item');
+ assert_equals(window.getComputedStyle(myItem).color, 'rgb(0, 128, 0)',
+ testCase['title']);
+ }, testCase['title'] + ' for ' + mode + ' mode.');
+
+ myList.parentNode.removeChild(myList);
+ document.head.removeChild(documentStyle)
+ }
+}
+
+// Open or Closed should not make any difference in style application.
+testCascadingOrder('open');
+testCascadingOrder('closed');
+
+
+// Taken from the example in
+// https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/blob/gh-pages/proposals/Shadow-DOM-Cascade-Order.md
+// https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/316
+// https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/blob/gh-pages/proposals/Shadow-DOM-Cascade-Order-in-v1.md
+// with element renamed and style rule location changed.
+//
+// <style>my-item { color: red; }</style>
+// <my-list>
+// <:shadow>
+// <style>::slotted(my-item) { color: blue; }</style>
+// <div>
+// <:shadow>
+// <slot/>
+// </:shadow>
+// <slot/>
+// </div>
+// </:shadow>
+// <my-item style="color: green;">
+// <:shadow>
+// <style>:host { color: yellow; }</style>
+// <slot/>
+// </:shadow>
+// ITEM
+// </my-item>
+// </my-list>
+//
+// The difference from the example tree above is that <my-list> has 2 levels of
+// shadow trees, each with ::slotted(my-list) style rules.
+
+function createMyListWith2LevelShadow(mode, slottedStyle1, slottedStyle2, hostStyle) {
+ var myList = document.createElement('my-list');
+ var root = myList.attachShadow({'mode': mode});
+ root.innerHTML = '<style>' + slottedStyle1 + '</style><div><slot></slot></div>';
+ var div = root.querySelector('div');
+ var root2 = div.attachShadow({'mode': mode});
+ root2.innerHTML = '<style>' + slottedStyle2 + '</style><slot></slot>';
+ var myItem = document.createElement('my-item');
+ myList.appendChild(myItem);
+ var root3 = myItem.attachShadow({'mode': mode});
+ root3.innerHTML = '<style>' + hostStyle + '</style><slot></slot>';
+ myItem.appendChild(document.createTextNode('ITEM'));
+ return myList;
+}
+
+function testCascadingOrderWith2LevelShadow(mode) {
+ // In all test cases, the rule specified as "color: green" should win.
+ var testCases = [
+ {
+ title: 'F1. document vs others, document (the first rule in tree-of-trees order) rule should win',
+ documentStyle: 'my-item { color: green; }',
+ slottedStyle1: '::slotted(my-item) { color: red; }',
+ slottedStyle2: '::slotted(my-item) { color: red; }',
+ hostStyle: ':host { color: red; }',
+ },
+ {
+ title: 'F2. document with !important vs others, document rule should win',
+ documentStyle: 'my-item { color: green !important; }',
+ slottedStyle1: '::slotted(my-item) { color: red; }',
+ slottedStyle2: '::slotted(my-item) { color: red; }',
+ hostStyle: ':host { color: red; }',
+ },
+ {
+ title: 'F3. document vs ::slotted with !important, important rule should win',
+ documentStyle: 'my-item { color: red; }',
+ slottedStyle1: '::slotted(my-item) { color: green !important; }',
+ slottedStyle2: '::slotted(my-item) { color: red; }',
+ hostStyle: ':host { color: red; }',
+ },
+ {
+ title: 'F4. document vs ::slotted with !important, important rule should win',
+ documentStyle: 'my-item { color: red; }',
+ slottedStyle1: '::slotted(my-item) { color: red; }',
+ slottedStyle2: '::slotted(my-item) { color: green !important; }',
+ hostStyle: ':host { color: red; }',
+ },
+ {
+ title: 'F5. document vs :host with !important, important rule should win',
+ documentStyle: 'my-item { color: red; }',
+ slottedStyle1: '::slotted(my-item) { color: red; }',
+ slottedStyle2: '::slotted(my-item) { color: red; }',
+ hostStyle: ':host { color: green !important; }',
+ },
+ {
+ title: 'F6. all rules with !important, the last rule in tree-of-trees should win',
+ documentStyle: 'my-item { color: red !important; }',
+ slottedStyle1: '::slotted(my-item) { color: red !important; }',
+ slottedStyle2: '::slotted(my-item) { color: red !important; }',
+ hostStyle: ':host { color: green !important ; }',
+ }
+ ];
+
+ for (var i = 0; i < testCases.length; ++i) {
+ var testCase = testCases[i];
+ var documentStyle = document.createElement('style');
+ documentStyle.appendChild(document.createTextNode(testCase['documentStyle']));
+ document.head.appendChild(documentStyle);
+
+ var myList = createMyListWith2LevelShadow(mode,
+ testCase['slottedStyle1'], testCase['slottedStyle2'], testCase['hostStyle']);
+ document.body.appendChild(myList);
+
+ test(function () {
+ var myItem = myList.querySelector('my-item');
+ assert_equals(window.getComputedStyle(myItem).color, 'rgb(0, 128, 0)',
+ testCase['title']);
+ }, testCase['title'] + ' for ' + mode + ' mode.');
+
+ myList.parentNode.removeChild(myList);
+ document.head.removeChild(documentStyle)
+ }
+}
+
+// Open or Closed should not make any difference in style application.
+testCascadingOrderWith2LevelShadow('open');
+testCascadingOrderWith2LevelShadow('closed');
+
+</script>
+</body>
+</html>
« no previous file with comments | « third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/imported/web-platform-tests/screen-orientation/resources/sandboxed-iframe-locking.html ('k') | third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/imported/web-platform-tests/shadow-dom/styles/shadow-cascade-order-expected.txt » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698