Clang plugin to check that unstable types are not used in IPC.

tools/clang/plugins/FindBadConstructsConsumer.cpp

 // Copyright (c) 2012 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
 // Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
 // found in the LICENSE file.
 
 #include "FindBadConstructsConsumer.h"
 
 #include "clang/Frontend/CompilerInstance.h"
 #include "clang/AST/Attr.h"
 #include "clang/Lex/Lexer.h"
 #include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
@@ skipping 85 matching lines @@
          record.getDescribedClassTemplate() ||
          record.getTemplateSpecializationKind() ||
          record.isDependentType();
 }
 
 }  // namespace
 
 FindBadConstructsConsumer::FindBadConstructsConsumer(CompilerInstance& instance,
                                                      const Options& options)
     : ChromeClassTester(instance, options) {
+  if (options.check_ipc) {
+    ipc_visitor_.reset(new CheckIPCVisitor(instance));
+  }
+
   // Messages for virtual method specifiers.
   diag_method_requires_override_ =
       diagnostic().getCustomDiagID(getErrorLevel(), kMethodRequiresOverride);
   diag_redundant_virtual_specifier_ =
       diagnostic().getCustomDiagID(getErrorLevel(), kRedundantVirtualSpecifier);
   diag_base_method_virtual_and_final_ =
       diagnostic().getCustomDiagID(getErrorLevel(), kBaseMethodVirtualAndFinal);
 
   // Messages for destructors.
   diag_no_explicit_dtor_ =
@@ skipping 13 matching lines @@
   diag_note_inheritance_ =
       diagnostic().getCustomDiagID(DiagnosticsEngine::Note, kNoteInheritance);
   diag_note_implicit_dtor_ =
       diagnostic().getCustomDiagID(DiagnosticsEngine::Note, kNoteImplicitDtor);
   diag_note_public_dtor_ =
       diagnostic().getCustomDiagID(DiagnosticsEngine::Note, kNotePublicDtor);
   diag_note_protected_non_virtual_dtor_ = diagnostic().getCustomDiagID(
       DiagnosticsEngine::Note, kNoteProtectedNonVirtualDtor);
 }
 
+void FindBadConstructsConsumer::Visit(ASTContext& context) {
+  if (ipc_visitor_) ipc_visitor_->set_context(&context);
+  RecursiveASTVisitor::TraverseDecl(context.getTranslationUnitDecl());
+  if (ipc_visitor_) ipc_visitor_->set_context(nullptr);
+}
+
+bool FindBadConstructsConsumer::shouldVisitTemplateInstantiations() const {
+  return RecursiveASTVisitor::shouldVisitTemplateInstantiations() ||

[dcheng, 2016/03/07 23:44:39]

I don't think we need to call the 'base' method here, it's not very interesting.

[Dmitry Skiba, 2016/03/08 01:16:11]

Yes, but it provides the value I "blend" with. I don't want to solely decide
what this method should return, I just want to make sure it respects what
ipc_visitor wants. Having base call also makes it easy to see that method should
be removed once ipc_message is removed, since in that case method collapses to a
single base call.

+      (ipc_visitor_ && ipc_visitor_->should_visit_template_instantiations());
+}
+
+bool FindBadConstructsConsumer::TraverseDecl(Decl* decl) {
+  if (ipc_visitor_) ipc_visitor_->BeginDecl(decl);
+  bool result = RecursiveASTVisitor::TraverseDecl(decl);
+  if (ipc_visitor_) ipc_visitor_->EndDecl();
+  return result;

[dcheng, 2016/03/07 23:44:39]

Seems like this should all just be in VisitDecl() for consistency with RAV's
naming schemes (and we won't need to manually dispatch to the 'base'
implementation either).

[Dmitry Skiba, 2016/03/08 01:16:11]

VisitDecl() is called on leafs, so I won't be able to create stack of current
decls, see GetParentDecl() and its uses in CheckIPCVisitor.

+}
+
 bool FindBadConstructsConsumer::VisitDecl(clang::Decl* decl) {
   clang::TagDecl* tag_decl = dyn_cast<clang::TagDecl>(decl);
   if (tag_decl && tag_decl->isCompleteDefinition())
     CheckTag(tag_decl);
   return true;
 }
 
+bool FindBadConstructsConsumer::VisitTemplateSpecializationType(
+    TemplateSpecializationType* spec) {
+  if (ipc_visitor_) ipc_visitor_->VisitTemplateSpecializationType(spec);
+  return true;
+}
+
+bool FindBadConstructsConsumer::VisitCallExpr(CallExpr* call_expr) {
+  if (ipc_visitor_) ipc_visitor_->VisitCallExpr(call_expr);
+  return true;
+}
+
 void FindBadConstructsConsumer::CheckChromeClass(SourceLocation record_location,
                                                  CXXRecordDecl* record) {
   // By default, the clang checker doesn't check some types (templates, etc).
   // That was only a mistake; once Chromium code passes these checks, we should
   // remove the "check-templates" option and remove this code.
   // See crbug.com/441916
   if (!options_.check_templates && IsPodOrTemplateType(*record))
     return;
 
   bool implementation_file = InImplementationFile(record_location);
@@ skipping 714 matching lines @@
     // one of those, it means there is at least one member after a factory.
     if (weak_ptr_factory_location.isValid() &&
         !param_is_weak_ptr_factory_to_self) {
       diagnostic().Report(weak_ptr_factory_location,
                           diag_weak_ptr_factory_order_);
     }
   }
 }
 
 }  // namespace chrome_checker