Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(206)

Issues Search
    My Issues | Starred     Open | Closed | All

Unified Diff: net/cert/ct_policy_enforcer_unittest.cc

Issue 1652603002: Add information to SSLInfo about CT EV policy compliance (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: rsleevi nits Created 4 years, 10 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « net/cert/ct_policy_enforcer.cc ('k') | net/cert/ct_policy_status.h » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: net/cert/ct_policy_enforcer_unittest.cc
diff --git a/net/cert/ct_policy_enforcer_unittest.cc b/net/cert/ct_policy_enforcer_unittest.cc
index 435525293337ea7569e52ccf35e881580b1123b1..c6c61b36a3390137f8ab8ec3c996c14578cb9f08 100644
--- a/net/cert/ct_policy_enforcer_unittest.cc
+++ b/net/cert/ct_policy_enforcer_unittest.cc
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
#include "crypto/sha2.h"
#include "net/base/test_data_directory.h"
#include "net/cert/ct_ev_whitelist.h"
+#include "net/cert/ct_policy_status.h"
#include "net/cert/ct_verify_result.h"
#include "net/cert/x509_certificate.h"
#include "net/test/cert_test_util.h"
@@ -65,6 +66,8 @@ class CTPolicyEnforcerTest : public ::testing::Test {
non_google_log_id_.assign(crypto::kSHA256Length, 'A');
}
+ // TODO(eranm): Remove the use of CTVerifyResult in this file and just
+ // use lists of verified SCTs. https://crbug.com/587921
void FillResultWithSCTsOfOrigin(
ct::SignedCertificateTimestamp::Origin desired_origin,
size_t num_scts,
@@ -123,15 +126,17 @@ class CTPolicyEnforcerTest : public ::testing::Test {
for (size_t i = 0; i < required_scts - 1; ++i) {
FillResultWithSCTsOfOrigin(ct::SignedCertificateTimestamp::SCT_EMBEDDED,
1, std::vector<std::string>(), false, &result);
- EXPECT_FALSE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(
- cert.get(), nullptr, result, BoundNetLog()))
+ EXPECT_EQ(ct::EVPolicyCompliance::EV_POLICY_NOT_ENOUGH_SCTS,
+ policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(
+ cert.get(), nullptr, result.verified_scts, BoundNetLog()))
<< " for: " << (end - start).InDays() << " and " << required_scts
<< " scts=" << result.verified_scts.size() << " i=" << i;
}
FillResultWithSCTsOfOrigin(ct::SignedCertificateTimestamp::SCT_EMBEDDED, 1,
std::vector<std::string>(), false, &result);
- EXPECT_TRUE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(
- cert.get(), nullptr, result, BoundNetLog()))
+ EXPECT_EQ(ct::EVPolicyCompliance::EV_POLICY_COMPLIES_VIA_SCTS,
+ policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(
+ cert.get(), nullptr, result.verified_scts, BoundNetLog()))
<< " for: " << (end - start).InDays() << " and " << required_scts
<< " scts=" << result.verified_scts.size();
}
@@ -148,8 +153,9 @@ TEST_F(CTPolicyEnforcerTest,
ct::CTVerifyResult result;
FillResultWithRepeatedLogID(google_log_id_, 2, true, &result);
- EXPECT_FALSE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(
- chain_.get(), nullptr, result, BoundNetLog()));
+ EXPECT_EQ(ct::EVPolicyCompliance::EV_POLICY_NOT_DIVERSE_SCTS,
+ policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(
+ chain_.get(), nullptr, result.verified_scts, BoundNetLog()));
}
TEST_F(CTPolicyEnforcerTest,
@@ -157,16 +163,18 @@ TEST_F(CTPolicyEnforcerTest,
ct::CTVerifyResult result;
FillResultWithRepeatedLogID(non_google_log_id_, 2, true, &result);
- EXPECT_FALSE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(
- chain_.get(), nullptr, result, BoundNetLog()));
+ EXPECT_EQ(ct::EVPolicyCompliance::EV_POLICY_NOT_DIVERSE_SCTS,
+ policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(
+ chain_.get(), nullptr, result.verified_scts, BoundNetLog()));
}
TEST_F(CTPolicyEnforcerTest, ConformsToCTEVPolicyIfSCTBeforeEnforcementDate) {
ct::CTVerifyResult result;
FillResultWithRepeatedLogID(non_google_log_id_, 2, false, &result);
- EXPECT_TRUE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(chain_.get(), nullptr,
- result, BoundNetLog()));
+ EXPECT_EQ(ct::EVPolicyCompliance::EV_POLICY_COMPLIES_VIA_SCTS,
+ policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(
+ chain_.get(), nullptr, result.verified_scts, BoundNetLog()));
}
TEST_F(CTPolicyEnforcerTest, ConformsToCTEVPolicyWithNonEmbeddedSCTs) {
@@ -174,8 +182,9 @@ TEST_F(CTPolicyEnforcerTest, ConformsToCTEVPolicyWithNonEmbeddedSCTs) {
FillResultWithSCTsOfOrigin(
ct::SignedCertificateTimestamp::SCT_FROM_TLS_EXTENSION, 2, &result);
- EXPECT_TRUE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(chain_.get(), nullptr,
- result, BoundNetLog()));
+ EXPECT_EQ(ct::EVPolicyCompliance::EV_POLICY_COMPLIES_VIA_SCTS,
+ policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(
+ chain_.get(), nullptr, result.verified_scts, BoundNetLog()));
}
TEST_F(CTPolicyEnforcerTest, ConformsToCTEVPolicyWithEmbeddedSCTs) {
@@ -184,8 +193,9 @@ TEST_F(CTPolicyEnforcerTest, ConformsToCTEVPolicyWithEmbeddedSCTs) {
FillResultWithSCTsOfOrigin(ct::SignedCertificateTimestamp::SCT_EMBEDDED, 5,
&result);
- EXPECT_TRUE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(chain_.get(), nullptr,
- result, BoundNetLog()));
+ EXPECT_EQ(ct::EVPolicyCompliance::EV_POLICY_COMPLIES_VIA_SCTS,
+ policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(
+ chain_.get(), nullptr, result.verified_scts, BoundNetLog()));
}
TEST_F(CTPolicyEnforcerTest, DoesNotConformToCTEVPolicyNotEnoughSCTs) {
@@ -198,14 +208,18 @@ TEST_F(CTPolicyEnforcerTest, DoesNotConformToCTEVPolicyNotEnoughSCTs) {
FillResultWithSCTsOfOrigin(ct::SignedCertificateTimestamp::SCT_EMBEDDED, 1,
&result);
- EXPECT_FALSE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(
- chain_.get(), non_including_whitelist.get(), result, BoundNetLog()));
+ EXPECT_EQ(ct::EVPolicyCompliance::EV_POLICY_NOT_ENOUGH_SCTS,
+ policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(
+ chain_.get(), non_including_whitelist.get(),
+ result.verified_scts, BoundNetLog()));
// ... but should be OK if whitelisted.
scoped_refptr<ct::EVCertsWhitelist> whitelist(
new DummyEVCertsWhitelist(true, true));
- EXPECT_TRUE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(
- chain_.get(), whitelist.get(), result, BoundNetLog()));
+ EXPECT_EQ(
+ ct::EVPolicyCompliance::EV_POLICY_COMPLIES_VIA_WHITELIST,
+ policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(
+ chain_.get(), whitelist.get(), result.verified_scts, BoundNetLog()));
}
TEST_F(CTPolicyEnforcerTest, DoesNotConformToPolicyInvalidDates) {
@@ -214,13 +228,17 @@ TEST_F(CTPolicyEnforcerTest, DoesNotConformToPolicyInvalidDates) {
ct::CTVerifyResult result;
FillResultWithSCTsOfOrigin(ct::SignedCertificateTimestamp::SCT_EMBEDDED, 5,
&result);
- EXPECT_FALSE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(
- no_valid_dates_cert.get(), nullptr, result, BoundNetLog()));
+ EXPECT_EQ(ct::EVPolicyCompliance::EV_POLICY_NOT_ENOUGH_SCTS,
+ policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(
+ no_valid_dates_cert.get(), nullptr, result.verified_scts,
+ BoundNetLog()));
// ... but should be OK if whitelisted.
scoped_refptr<ct::EVCertsWhitelist> whitelist(
new DummyEVCertsWhitelist(true, true));
- EXPECT_TRUE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(
- chain_.get(), whitelist.get(), result, BoundNetLog()));
+ EXPECT_EQ(
+ ct::EVPolicyCompliance::EV_POLICY_COMPLIES_VIA_WHITELIST,
+ policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(
+ chain_.get(), whitelist.get(), result.verified_scts, BoundNetLog()));
}
TEST_F(CTPolicyEnforcerTest,
@@ -274,8 +292,10 @@ TEST_F(CTPolicyEnforcerTest, ConformsToPolicyByEVWhitelistPresence) {
ct::CTVerifyResult result;
FillResultWithSCTsOfOrigin(ct::SignedCertificateTimestamp::SCT_EMBEDDED, 1,
&result);
- EXPECT_TRUE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(
- chain_.get(), whitelist.get(), result, BoundNetLog()));
+ EXPECT_EQ(
+ ct::EVPolicyCompliance::EV_POLICY_COMPLIES_VIA_WHITELIST,
+ policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(
+ chain_.get(), whitelist.get(), result.verified_scts, BoundNetLog()));
}
TEST_F(CTPolicyEnforcerTest, IgnoresInvalidEVWhitelist) {
@@ -285,16 +305,19 @@ TEST_F(CTPolicyEnforcerTest, IgnoresInvalidEVWhitelist) {
ct::CTVerifyResult result;
FillResultWithSCTsOfOrigin(ct::SignedCertificateTimestamp::SCT_EMBEDDED, 1,
&result);
- EXPECT_FALSE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(
- chain_.get(), whitelist.get(), result, BoundNetLog()));
+ EXPECT_EQ(
+ ct::EVPolicyCompliance::EV_POLICY_NOT_ENOUGH_SCTS,
+ policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(
+ chain_.get(), whitelist.get(), result.verified_scts, BoundNetLog()));
}
TEST_F(CTPolicyEnforcerTest, IgnoresNullEVWhitelist) {
ct::CTVerifyResult result;
FillResultWithSCTsOfOrigin(ct::SignedCertificateTimestamp::SCT_EMBEDDED, 1,
&result);
- EXPECT_FALSE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(
- chain_.get(), nullptr, result, BoundNetLog()));
+ EXPECT_EQ(ct::EVPolicyCompliance::EV_POLICY_NOT_ENOUGH_SCTS,
+ policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(
+ chain_.get(), nullptr, result.verified_scts, BoundNetLog()));
}
} // namespace
« no previous file with comments | « net/cert/ct_policy_enforcer.cc ('k') | net/cert/ct_policy_status.h » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698