Import SQLite 3.10.2.

third_party/sqlite/src/test/index6.test

Index: third_party/sqlite/src/test/index6.test
diff --git a/third_party/sqlite/src/test/index6.test b/third_party/sqlite/src/test/index6.test
index 68bdd06c14b477c31f9c276828925688b333492e..33ae3d1cb11f7f5a945716b7a197490edfa0f130 100644
--- a/third_party/sqlite/src/test/index6.test
+++ b/third_party/sqlite/src/test/index6.test
@@ -267,5 +267,113 @@ do_execsql_test index6-6.2 {
   PRAGMA integrity_check;
 } {ok}
 
+# Test case for ticket [2326c258d02ead33d69faa63de8f4686b9b1b9d9] on
+# 2015-02-24.  Any use of a partial index qualifying constraint inside
+# the ON clause of a LEFT JOIN was causing incorrect results for all
+# versions of SQLite 3.8.0 through 3.8.8.
+#
+do_execsql_test index6-7.0 {
+  CREATE TABLE t7a(x);
+  CREATE TABLE t7b(y);
+  INSERT INTO t7a(x) VALUES(1);
+  CREATE INDEX t7ax ON t7a(x) WHERE x=99;
+  PRAGMA automatic_index=OFF;
+  SELECT * FROM t7a LEFT JOIN t7b ON (x=99) ORDER BY x;
+} {1 {}}
+do_execsql_test index6-7.1 {
+  INSERT INTO t7b(y) VALUES(2);
+  SELECT * FROM t7a JOIN t7b ON (x=99) ORDER BY x;
+} {}
+do_execsql_test index6-7.2 {
+  INSERT INTO t7a(x) VALUES(99);
+  SELECT * FROM t7a LEFT JOIN t7b ON (x=99) ORDER BY x;
+} {1 {} 99 2}
+do_execsql_test index6-7.3 {
+  SELECT * FROM t7a JOIN t7b ON (x=99) ORDER BY x;
+} {99 2}
+do_execsql_test index6-7.4 {
+  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
+  SELECT * FROM t7a JOIN t7b ON (x=99) ORDER BY x;
+} {/USING COVERING INDEX t7ax/}
+
+
+do_execsql_test index6-8.0 {
+  CREATE TABLE t8a(a,b);
+  CREATE TABLE t8b(x,y);
+  CREATE INDEX i8c ON t8b(y) WHERE x = 'value';
+
+  INSERT INTO t8a VALUES(1, 'one');
+  INSERT INTO t8a VALUES(2, 'two');
+  INSERT INTO t8a VALUES(3, 'three');
+
+  INSERT INTO t8b VALUES('value', 1);
+  INSERT INTO t8b VALUES('dummy', 2);
+  INSERT INTO t8b VALUES('value', 3);
+  INSERT INTO t8b VALUES('dummy', 4);
+} {}
+
+do_eqp_test index6-8.1 {
+  SELECT * FROM t8a LEFT JOIN t8b ON (x = 'value' AND y = a)
+} {
+  0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t8a} 
+  0 1 1 {SEARCH TABLE t8b USING INDEX i8c (y=?)}
+}
+
+do_execsql_test index6-8.2 {
+  SELECT * FROM t8a LEFT JOIN t8b ON (x = 'value' AND y = a)
+} {
+  1 one value 1 
+  2 two {} {} 
+  3 three value 3
+}
+
+# 2015-06-11.  Assertion fault found by AFL
+#
+do_execsql_test index6-9.1 {
+  CREATE TABLE t9(a int, b int, c int);
+  CREATE INDEX t9ca ON t9(c,a) WHERE a in (10,12,20);
+  INSERT INTO t9 VALUES(1,1,9),(10,2,35),(11,15,82),(20,19,5),(NULL,7,3);
+  UPDATE t9 SET b=c WHERE a in (10,12,20);
+  SELECT a,b,c,'|' FROM t9 ORDER BY a;
+} {{} 7 3 | 1 1 9 | 10 35 35 | 11 15 82 | 20 5 5 |}
+do_execsql_test index6-9.2 {
+  DROP TABLE t9;
+  CREATE TABLE t9(a int, b int, c int, PRIMARY KEY(a)) WITHOUT ROWID;
+  CREATE INDEX t9ca ON t9(c,a) WHERE a in (10,12,20);
+  INSERT INTO t9 VALUES(1,1,9),(10,2,35),(11,15,82),(20,19,5);
+  UPDATE t9 SET b=c WHERE a in (10,12,20);
+  SELECT a,b,c,'|' FROM t9 ORDER BY a;
+} {1 1 9 | 10 35 35 | 11 15 82 | 20 5 5 |}
+
+# AND-connected terms in the WHERE clause of a partial index
+#
+do_execsql_test index6-10.1 {
+  CREATE TABLE t10(a,b,c,d,e INTEGER PRIMARY KEY);
+  INSERT INTO t10 VALUES
+    (1,2,3,4,5),
+    (2,3,4,5,6),
+    (3,4,5,6,7),
+    (1,2,3,8,9);
+  CREATE INDEX t10x ON t10(d) WHERE a=1 AND b=2 AND c=3;
+  SELECT e FROM t10 WHERE a=1 AND b=2 AND c=3 ORDER BY d;
+} {5 9}
+do_execsql_test index6-10.1eqp {
+  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
+  SELECT e FROM t10 WHERE a=1 AND b=2 AND c=3 ORDER BY d;
+} {/USING INDEX t10x/}
+do_execsql_test index6-10.2 {
+  SELECT e FROM t10 WHERE c=3 AND 2=b AND a=1 ORDER BY d DESC;
+} {9 5}
+do_execsql_test index6-10.2eqp {
+  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
+  SELECT e FROM t10 WHERE c=3 AND 2=b AND a=1 ORDER BY d DESC;
+} {/USING INDEX t10x/}
+do_execsql_test index6-10.3 {
+  SELECT e FROM t10 WHERE a=1 AND b=2 ORDER BY d DESC;
+} {9 5}
+do_execsql_test index6-10.3eqp {
+  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
+  SELECT e FROM t10 WHERE a=1 AND b=2 ORDER BY d DESC;
+} {~/USING INDEX t10x/}
 
 finish_test