Revert of sdf: use linear edge distance approximation for all gradient directions

Revert of sdf: use linear edge distance approximation for all gradient directions (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1545893003/ )

Reason for revert:
breaks roll?

https://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.blink/builders/linux_blink_rel/builds/81753

Original issue's description:
> sdf: use linear edge distance approximation for all gradient directions
> 
> Image diff tools tell me there are diffs, but I sure can't see them.
> This drops edge_distance() off the chart as far as CPU cost goes.
> 
> BUG=skia:4729
> GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search2?unt=true&query=source_type%3Dgm&master=false&issue=1545893003
> 
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/8a87bb4d5c23da83ef406ef87b470afa4217d7a4

TBR=jvanverth@google.com,bsalomon@google.com,reed@google.com,mtklein@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=skia:4729
Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/31d59e71cf5a571ff903d64ba2a6f17b715bfcfb

[mtklein, 2016-01-20 00:26:39]

Created Revert of sdf: use linear edge distance approximation for all gradient
directions

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-01-20 00:26:48]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1603953005/1
View timeline at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-timeline/1603953005/1

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-01-20 00:26:58]

Description was changed from

==========
Revert of sdf: use linear edge distance approximation for all gradient
directions (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1545893003/ )

Reason for revert:
breaks roll?

https://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.blink/builders/linux_blink_rel/builds/...

Original issue's description:
> sdf: use linear edge distance approximation for all gradient directions
> 
> Image diff tools tell me there are diffs, but I sure can't see them.
> This drops edge_distance() off the chart as far as CPU cost goes.
> 
> BUG=skia:4729
> GOLD_TRYBOT_URL=
https://gold.skia.org/search2?unt=true&query=source_type%3Dgm&master=false&is...
> 
> Committed:
https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/8a87bb4d5c23da83ef406ef87b470afa4217d7a4

TBR=jvanverth@google.com,bsalomon@google.com,reed@google.com,mtklein@chromium...
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=skia:4729
==========

to

==========
Revert of sdf: use linear edge distance approximation for all gradient
directions (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1545893003/ )

Reason for revert:
breaks roll?

https://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.blink/builders/linux_blink_rel/builds/...

Original issue's description:
> sdf: use linear edge distance approximation for all gradient directions
> 
> Image diff tools tell me there are diffs, but I sure can't see them.
> This drops edge_distance() off the chart as far as CPU cost goes.
> 
> BUG=skia:4729
> GOLD_TRYBOT_URL=
https://gold.skia.org/search2?unt=true&query=source_type%3Dgm&master=false&is...
> 
> Committed:
https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/8a87bb4d5c23da83ef406ef87b470afa4217d7a4

TBR=jvanverth@google.com,bsalomon@google.com,reed@google.com,mtklein@chromium...
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=skia:4729

Committed:
https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/31d59e71cf5a571ff903d64ba2a6f17b715bfcfb
==========

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-01-20 00:26:58]

Committed patchset #1 (id:1) as
https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/31d59e71cf5a571ff903d64ba2a6f17b715bfcfb