Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(163)

Unified Diff: test/cctest/test-parsing.cc

Issue 160073006: Implement handling of arrow functions in the parser (Closed) Base URL: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge
Patch Set: Same, plus a rebase and conflicts resolved Created 6 years, 6 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« src/preparser.h ('K') | « src/token.h ('k') | no next file » | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: test/cctest/test-parsing.cc
diff --git a/test/cctest/test-parsing.cc b/test/cctest/test-parsing.cc
index 8066f8052a83dd02586575cf694a268d9aeef17e..552038d8b9d554f962643a680d1f52d06489d1df 100644
--- a/test/cctest/test-parsing.cc
+++ b/test/cctest/test-parsing.cc
@@ -292,6 +292,7 @@ TEST(StandAlonePreParser) {
"function foo(x, y) { return x + y; }",
"%ArgleBargle(glop);",
"var x = new new Function('this.x = 42');",
+ "var f = (x, y) => x + y;",
NULL
};
@@ -308,6 +309,7 @@ TEST(StandAlonePreParser) {
i::PreParser preparser(&scanner, &log, stack_limit);
preparser.set_allow_lazy(true);
preparser.set_allow_natives_syntax(true);
+ preparser.set_allow_arrow_functions(true);
i::PreParser::PreParseResult result = preparser.PreParseProgram();
CHECK_EQ(i::PreParser::kPreParseSuccess, result);
i::ScriptData data(log.ExtractData());
@@ -914,7 +916,7 @@ static int Utf8LengthHelper(const char* s) {
TEST(ScopePositions) {
- v8::internal::FLAG_harmony_scoping = true;
+ i::FLAG_harmony_scoping = true;
// Test the parser for correctly setting the start and end positions
// of a scope. We check the scope positions of exactly one scope
@@ -970,7 +972,8 @@ TEST(ScopePositions) {
" infunction;\n"
" }", "\n"
" more;", i::FUNCTION_SCOPE, i::SLOPPY },
- { " (function fun", "(a,b) { infunction; }", ")();",
+ { " start;\n"
marja 2014/07/01 07:23:40 Why this change?
+ " (function fun", "(a,b) { infunction; }", ")();",
i::FUNCTION_SCOPE, i::SLOPPY },
{ " for ", "(let x = 1 ; x < 10; ++ x) { block; }", " more;",
i::BLOCK_SCOPE, i::STRICT },
@@ -1181,7 +1184,8 @@ enum ParserFlag {
kAllowModules,
kAllowGenerators,
kAllowForOf,
- kAllowHarmonyNumericLiterals
+ kAllowHarmonyNumericLiterals,
+ kAllowArrowFunctions
};
@@ -1202,6 +1206,7 @@ void SetParserFlags(i::ParserBase<Traits>* parser,
parser->set_allow_for_of(flags.Contains(kAllowForOf));
parser->set_allow_harmony_numeric_literals(
flags.Contains(kAllowHarmonyNumericLiterals));
+ parser->set_allow_arrow_functions(flags.Contains(kAllowArrowFunctions));
}
@@ -1406,7 +1411,7 @@ TEST(ParserSync) {
static const ParserFlag flags1[] = {
kAllowLazy, kAllowHarmonyScoping, kAllowModules, kAllowGenerators,
- kAllowForOf
+ kAllowForOf, kAllowArrowFunctions
};
for (int i = 0; context_data[i][0] != NULL; ++i) {
for (int j = 0; statement_data[j] != NULL; ++j) {
@@ -1427,7 +1432,8 @@ TEST(ParserSync) {
termination_data[k],
context_data[i][1]);
CHECK(length == kProgramSize);
- TestParserSync(program.start(), flags1, ARRAY_SIZE(flags1));
+ TestParserSync(program.start(), flags1, ARRAY_SIZE(flags1),
+ kSuccessOrError);
}
}
}
@@ -1436,11 +1442,11 @@ TEST(ParserSync) {
// interaction with the flags above, so test these separately to reduce
// the combinatorial explosion.
static const ParserFlag flags2[] = { kAllowHarmonyNumericLiterals };
- TestParserSync("0o1234", flags2, ARRAY_SIZE(flags2));
- TestParserSync("0b1011", flags2, ARRAY_SIZE(flags2));
+ TestParserSync("0o1234", flags2, ARRAY_SIZE(flags2), kSuccessOrError);
+ TestParserSync("0b1011", flags2, ARRAY_SIZE(flags2), kSuccessOrError);
static const ParserFlag flags3[] = { kAllowNativesSyntax };
- TestParserSync("%DebugPrint(123)", flags3, ARRAY_SIZE(flags3));
+ TestParserSync("%DebugPrint(123)", flags3, ARRAY_SIZE(flags3), kSuccessOrError);
}
@@ -1448,6 +1454,7 @@ TEST(StrictOctal) {
// Test that syntax error caused by octal literal is reported correctly as
// such (issue 2220).
v8::V8::Initialize();
+
marja 2014/07/01 07:23:40 This file seems to contain some unintentional chan
v8::HandleScope scope(CcTest::isolate());
v8::Context::Scope context_scope(
v8::Context::New(CcTest::isolate()));
@@ -1484,7 +1491,7 @@ void RunParserSyncTest(const char* context_data[][2],
static const ParserFlag default_flags[] = {
kAllowLazy, kAllowHarmonyScoping, kAllowModules, kAllowGenerators,
- kAllowForOf, kAllowNativesSyntax
+ kAllowForOf, kAllowNativesSyntax, kAllowArrowFunctions
};
ParserFlag* generated_flags = NULL;
if (flags == NULL) {
@@ -1561,6 +1568,10 @@ TEST(ErrorsEvalAndArguments) {
"function foo(arguments) { }",
"function foo(bar, eval) { }",
"function foo(bar, arguments) { }",
+ "(eval) => { }",
+ "(arguments) => { }",
+ "(foo, eval) => { }",
+ "(foo, arguments) => { }",
"eval = 1;",
"arguments = 1;",
"var foo = eval = 1;",
@@ -1617,6 +1628,7 @@ TEST(NoErrorsEvalAndArgumentsStrict) {
const char* context_data[][2] = {
{ "\"use strict\";", "" },
{ "function test_func() { \"use strict\";", "}" },
+ { "() => { \"use strict\"; ", "}" },
{ NULL, NULL }
};
@@ -1632,7 +1644,9 @@ TEST(NoErrorsEvalAndArgumentsStrict) {
NULL
};
- RunParserSyncTest(context_data, statement_data, kSuccess);
+ static const ParserFlag always_flags[] = { kAllowArrowFunctions };
+ RunParserSyncTest(context_data, statement_data, kSuccess, NULL, 0,
+ always_flags, ARRAY_SIZE(always_flags));
}
@@ -1644,6 +1658,7 @@ TEST(ErrorsFutureStrictReservedWords) {
const char* context_data[][2] = {
{ "\"use strict\";", "" },
{ "function test_func() {\"use strict\"; ", "}"},
+ { "() => { \"use strict\"; ", "}" },
{ NULL, NULL }
};
@@ -1654,6 +1669,8 @@ TEST(ErrorsFutureStrictReservedWords) {
"function interface() { }",
"function foo(interface) { }",
"function foo(bar, interface) { }",
+ "(interface) => { }",
+ "(bar, interface) => { }",
"interface = 1;",
"var foo = interface = 1;",
"++interface;",
@@ -1661,7 +1678,9 @@ TEST(ErrorsFutureStrictReservedWords) {
NULL
};
- RunParserSyncTest(context_data, statement_data, kError);
+ static const ParserFlag always_flags[] = { kAllowArrowFunctions };
+ RunParserSyncTest(context_data, statement_data, kError, NULL, 0,
+ always_flags, ARRAY_SIZE(always_flags));
}
@@ -1669,6 +1688,7 @@ TEST(NoErrorsFutureStrictReservedWords) {
const char* context_data[][2] = {
{ "", "" },
{ "function test_func() {", "}"},
+ { "() => {", "}" },
{ NULL, NULL }
};
@@ -1686,7 +1706,10 @@ TEST(NoErrorsFutureStrictReservedWords) {
NULL
};
- RunParserSyncTest(context_data, statement_data, kSuccess);
+ static const ParserFlag always_flags[] = { kAllowArrowFunctions };
+ RunParserSyncTest(context_data, statement_data, kSuccess, NULL, 0,
+ always_flags, ARRAY_SIZE(always_flags));
+
}
@@ -1699,6 +1722,8 @@ TEST(ErrorsReservedWords) {
{ "\"use strict\";", "" },
{ "var eval; function test_func() {", "}"},
{ "var eval; function test_func() {\"use strict\"; ", "}"},
+ { "var eval; () => {", "}" },
+ { "var eval; () => {\"use strict\"; ", "}" },
{ NULL, NULL }
};
@@ -1709,6 +1734,8 @@ TEST(ErrorsReservedWords) {
"function super() { }",
"function foo(super) { }",
"function foo(bar, super) { }",
+ "(super) => { }",
+ "(bar, super) => { }",
"super = 1;",
"var foo = super = 1;",
"++super;",
@@ -1727,6 +1754,7 @@ TEST(NoErrorsYieldSloppy) {
const char* context_data[][2] = {
{ "", "" },
{ "function is_not_gen() {", "}" },
+ { "() => {", "}" },
{ NULL, NULL }
};
@@ -1744,7 +1772,9 @@ TEST(NoErrorsYieldSloppy) {
NULL
};
- RunParserSyncTest(context_data, statement_data, kSuccess);
+ static const ParserFlag always_flags[] = { kAllowArrowFunctions };
+ RunParserSyncTest(context_data, statement_data, kSuccess, NULL, 0,
+ always_flags, ARRAY_SIZE(always_flags));
}
@@ -1781,6 +1811,7 @@ TEST(ErrorsYieldStrict) {
{ "\"use strict\";", "" },
{ "\"use strict\"; function is_not_gen() {", "}" },
{ "function test_func() {\"use strict\"; ", "}"},
+ { "() => {\"use strict\"; ", "}" },
{ NULL, NULL }
};
@@ -1791,6 +1822,8 @@ TEST(ErrorsYieldStrict) {
"function yield() { }",
"function foo(yield) { }",
"function foo(bar, yield) { }",
+ "(yield) => { }",
+ "(bar, yield) => { }",
"yield = 1;",
"var foo = yield = 1;",
"++yield;",
@@ -1816,7 +1849,7 @@ TEST(NoErrorsYield) {
// This test requires kAllowGenerators to succeed.
static const ParserFlag always_true_flags[] = {
- kAllowGenerators
+ kAllowGenerators,
};
RunParserSyncTest(context_data, statement_data, kSuccess, NULL, 0,
always_true_flags, 1);
@@ -1871,6 +1904,7 @@ TEST(ErrorsIllegalWordsAsLabelsSloppy) {
const char* context_data[][2] = {
{ "", ""},
{ "function test_func() {", "}" },
+ { "() => {", "}" },
{ NULL, NULL }
};
@@ -1888,6 +1922,7 @@ TEST(ErrorsIllegalWordsAsLabelsStrict) {
const char* context_data[][2] = {
{ "\"use strict\";", "" },
{ "function test_func() {\"use strict\"; ", "}"},
+ { "() => {\"use strict\"; ", "}" },
{ NULL, NULL }
};
@@ -1907,8 +1942,10 @@ TEST(NoErrorsIllegalWordsAsLabels) {
const char* context_data[][2] = {
{ "", ""},
{ "function test_func() {", "}" },
+ { "() => {", "}" },
{ "\"use strict\";", "" },
{ "\"use strict\"; function test_func() {", "}" },
+ { "\"use strict\"; () => {", "}" },
{ NULL, NULL }
};
@@ -1919,7 +1956,9 @@ TEST(NoErrorsIllegalWordsAsLabels) {
NULL
};
- RunParserSyncTest(context_data, statement_data, kSuccess);
+ static const ParserFlag always_flags[] = { kAllowArrowFunctions };
+ RunParserSyncTest(context_data, statement_data, kSuccess, NULL, 0,
+ always_flags, ARRAY_SIZE(always_flags));
}
@@ -1928,6 +1967,7 @@ TEST(ErrorsParenthesizedLabels) {
const char* context_data[][2] = {
{ "", ""},
{ "function test_func() {", "}" },
+ { "() => {", "}" },
{ NULL, NULL }
};
@@ -2177,6 +2217,7 @@ TEST(Intrinsics) {
RunParserSyncTest(context_data, statement_data, kSuccess, NULL, 0,
always_true_flags, 1);
+ RunParserSyncTest(context_data, statement_data, kSuccessOrError);
}
@@ -2771,3 +2812,168 @@ TEST(UseAsmUseCount) {
"function bar() { \"use asm\"; var baz = 1; }");
CHECK_EQ(2, use_counts[v8::Isolate::kUseAsm]);
}
+
+
+TEST(ErrorsArrowFunctions) {
marja 2014/07/01 07:23:40 I like this test! :)
+ // Tests that parser and preparser generate the same kind of errors
+ // on invalid arrow function syntax.
+ const char* context_data[][2] = {
+ {"", ";"},
+ {"v = ", ";"},
+ {"bar ? (", ") : baz;"},
+ {"bar ? baz : (", ");"},
+ {"bar[", "];"},
+ {"bar, ", ";"},
+ {"", ", bar;"},
+ { NULL, NULL }
+ };
+
+ const char* statement_data[] = {
+ "=> 0",
+ "=>",
+ "() =>",
+ "=> {}",
+ ") => {}",
+ ", => {}",
+ "(,) => {}",
+ "return => {}",
+ "() => {'value': 42}",
+
+ // Check that the early return introduced in ParsePrimaryExpression
+ // does not accept stray closing parentheses.
+ ")",
+ ") => 0",
+ "foo[()]",
+ "()",
+
+ // Parameter lists with extra parens should be recognized as errors.
+ "(()) => 0",
+ "((x)) => 0",
+ "((x, y)) => 0",
+ "(x, (y)) => 0",
+ "((x, y, z)) => 0",
+ "(x, (y, z)) => 0",
+ "((x, y), z) => 0",
+
+ // Parameter lists are always validated as strict, so those are errors.
+ "eval => {}",
+ "arguments => {}",
+ "yield => {}",
+ "interface => {}",
+ "(eval) => {}",
+ "(arguments) => {}",
+ "(yield) => {}",
+ "(interface) => {}",
+ "(eval, bar) => {}",
+ "(bar, eval) => {}",
+ "(bar, arguments) => {}",
+ "(bar, yield) => {}",
+ "(bar, interface) => {}",
+ // TODO(aperez): Detecting duplicates does not work in PreParser.
+ //"(bar, bar) => {}",
+
+ // The parameter list is parsed as an expression, but only
+ // a comma-separated list of identifier is valid.
+ "32 => {}",
+ "(32) => {}",
+ "(a, 32) => {}",
+ "if => {}",
+ "(if) => {}",
+ "(a, if) => {}",
+ "a + b => {}",
+ "(a + b) => {}",
+ "(a + b, c) => {}",
+ "(a, b - c) => {}",
+ "\"a\" => {}",
+ "(\"a\") => {}",
+ "(\"a\", b) => {}",
+ "(a, \"b\") => {}",
+ "-a => {}",
+ "(-a) => {}",
+ "(-a, b) => {}",
+ "(a, -b) => {}",
+ "{} => {}",
+ "({}) => {}",
+ "(a, {}) => {}",
+ "({}, a) => {}",
+ "a++ => {}",
+ "(a++) => {}",
+ "(a++, b) => {}",
+ "(a, b++) => {}",
+ "[] => {}",
+ "([]) => {}",
+ "(a, []) => {}",
+ "([], a) => {}",
+ "(a = b) => {}",
+ "(a = b, c) => {}",
+ "(a, b = c) => {}",
+ "(foo ? bar : baz) => {}",
+ "(a, foo ? bar : baz) => {}",
+ "(foo ? bar : baz, a) => {}",
+
+ NULL
+ };
+
+ RunParserSyncTest(context_data, statement_data, kError);
+}
+
+
+TEST(NoErrorsArrowFunctions) {
+ // Tests that parser and preparser accept valid arrow functions syntax.
+ const char* context_data[][2] = {
+ {"", ";"},
+ // TODO(aperez): Uncomment this when ParseArrowFunctionLiteral()
+ // generates code and returns a non-NULL expression. Currently it
+ // crashes when expression->set_is_parenthesized(true) is called.
+ //{"bar ? (", ") : baz;"},
+ //{"bar ? baz : (", ");"},
+ {"bar, ", ";"},
+ {"", ", bar;"},
+ { NULL, NULL }
+ };
+
+ const char* statement_data[] = {
+ "() => {}",
+ "() => { return 42 }",
+ "x => { return x; }",
+ "(x) => { return x; }",
+ "(x, y) => { return x + y; }",
+ "(x, y, z) => { return x + y + z; }",
+ "(x, y) => { x.a = y; }",
+ "() => 42",
+ "x => x",
+ "x => x * x",
+ "(x) => x",
+ "(x) => x * x",
+ "(x, y) => x + y",
+ "(x, y, z) => x, y, z",
+ "(x, y) => x.a = y",
+ "() => ({'value': 42})",
+ "x => y => x + y",
+ "(x, y) => (u, v) => x*u + y*v",
+ "(x, y) => z => z * (x + y)",
+ "x => (y, z) => z * (x + y)",
+
+ // Those are comma-separated expressions, with arrow functions as items.
+ // They stress the code for validating arrow function parameter lists.
+ "a, b => 0",
+ "a, b, (c, d) => 0",
+ "(a, b, (c, d) => 0)",
+ "(a, b) => 0, (c, d) => 1",
+ "(a, b => {}, a => a + 1)",
+ // TODO(aperez): Uncomment this when ParseArrowFunctionLiteral()
+ // generates code and returns a non-NULL expression. Currently it
+ // crashes when expression->set_is_parenthesized(true) is called.
+ //"((a, b) => {}, (a => a + 1))",
+ //"(a, (a, (b, c) => 0))",
+
+ // Arrow has more precedence, this is the same as: foo ? bar : (baz = {})
+ "foo ? bar : baz => {}",
+
+ NULL
+ };
+
+ static const ParserFlag always_flags[] = { kAllowArrowFunctions };
+ RunParserSyncTest(context_data, statement_data, kSuccess, NULL, 0,
+ always_flags, ARRAY_SIZE(always_flags));
+}
« src/preparser.h ('K') | « src/token.h ('k') | no next file » | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698