prepare skia for shared library build on android

gyp/skia_lib.gyp

Index: gyp/skia_lib.gyp
diff --git a/gyp/skia_base_libs.gyp b/gyp/skia_lib.gyp
similarity index 77%
rename from gyp/skia_base_libs.gyp
rename to gyp/skia_lib.gyp
index 83cc7c75295ea44e1d1f7ba8a25338fdd6525453..7334f946d5d85294c5027cfb2484232e5d27ddae 100644
--- a/gyp/skia_base_libs.gyp
+++ b/gyp/skia_lib.gyp
@@ -1,10 +1,14 @@
 # The minimal set of static libraries for basic Skia functionality.
+
 {
   'variables': {
     'component_libs': [
       'core.gyp:core',
+      'effects.gyp:effects',
+      'images.gyp:images',
       'opts.gyp:opts',
       'ports.gyp:ports',
+      'sfnt.gyp:sfnt',
       'utils.gyp:utils',
     ],
     'conditions': [
@@ -33,8 +37,15 @@
   },
   'targets': [
     {
-      'target_name': 'skia_base_libs',
-      'type': 'none',
+      'target_name': 'skia_lib',
+      'conditions': [
+        [ 'skia_shared_lib', {
+          'product_name': 'skia_local',

[borenet, 2013/05/31 14:29:57]

Maybe I missed the discussion, but this name doesn't make much sense to me. 
Ideally it would just be "skia" but I suspect that conflicts with something in
Android framework?  If "local" indicates that it's private to skia devs, why not
"skia_private" or "skia_internal"?

+          'type': 'shared_library',
+        }, {
+          'type': 'none',
+        }],
+      ],
       'dependencies': [
         '<@(component_libs)',
       ],